Full Answer
What did Kant say about Native Americans?
such as that blacks are lazy and that Native Americans have a 'half- extinguished vital energy' (DHR 2: 438), and remarked on their respective usefulness as slaves.8 Statements of a similar nature are found in Kant's lectures on anthropo- logy and on physical geography.
Did Kant do injustice to non-Europeans?
had spent three years travelling around the world with Captain Cook and had had extensive personal contacts with non-Europeans, found that Kant did injustice to the facts, trying to make them fit his theory, a theory which Forster also regarded as itself fundamentally mistaken. In his 1786
Should Kant's principles be rephrased in inegalitarian terms?
from these principles and continue our business as usual. Mills believes that it is, on the basis of Kant's racist remarks, and argues that Kant's principles should be rephrased in inegalitarian terms. Even if the most fundamental principles of Kant's practical philosophy (such as the Categorical Impera-
Did Kant mean to apply the categorical imperative to whites only?
claims that Kant intends to apply the Categorical Imperative and the Prin- ciple of Right to whites only: when Kant speaks of 'everyone', he means in reality 'all whites', not 'all humans'. Therefore, Mills argues, there is no contradiction between Kant's official universalist theory and his views on
See more
What were Immanuel Kant's beliefs?
His moral philosophy is a philosophy of freedom. Without human freedom, thought Kant, moral appraisal and moral responsibility would be impossible. Kant believes that if a person could not act otherwise, then his or her act can have no moral worth.
What did Immanuel Kant believe about slavery?
Kant's acceptance of non-white slavery is also apparent in passages such as the following: 'Americans and Negroes cannot govern themselves. Thus, [they] serve only as slaves' (sketches for the Lectures on Anthropology, from the s, : ).
What is Kant's theory of justice?
It is what Kant calls 'the universal principle of justice': that an action is just only if it is compatible with everyone's freedom under a law applying to all. This principle is not a guide to moral action but an authorization to use coercion.
What does Kant mean by treating someone as an end?
To treat someone as an end in him or herself requires in the first place that one not use him or her as mere means, that one respect each as a rational person with his or her own maxims. But beyond that, one may also seek to foster others' plans and maxims by sharing some of their ends.
What is Kant best known for?
Kant was a prolific writer, and his best-known works are the three "Critiques": the "Critique of Pure Reason (1781), the "Critique of Practical Reason" (1788), and the "Critique of Judgment" (1790).
What is the basic philosophy of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill?
Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral customs are formed. Immanuel Kant presented one perspective in The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his skill to reason.
What does Kant argue?
Kant began his ethical theory by arguing that the only virtue that can be unqualifiedly good is a good will. No other virtue has this status because every other virtue can be used to achieve immoral ends (for example, the virtue of loyalty is not good if one is loyal to an evil person).
How did Rousseau influence Kant?
First, Rousseau helped Kant turn away from moral sentimentalism and towards the conviction that morality is rooted in human reason. After his engagement with Rousseau, Kant gradually shifts towards the importance of reason rather than sentiment as the foundation of morals.
Do you agree with Immanuel Kant about freedom?
Kant, therefore, endorses the law of equal freedom, that everyone should have maximum freedom to pursue happiness consistent with the like freedom of everyone else, or what some libertarians have called the “Non-Aggression Principle.” This principle applies under government, not just in the state of nature.
What is an example of Kant's moral theory?
For example, if you hide an innocent person from violent criminals in order to protect his life, and the criminals come to your door asking if the person is with you, what should you do? Kantianism would have you tell the truth, even if it results in harm coming to the innocent person.
What is Kant's kingdom of ends?
A Kingdom of Ends is composed entirely of rational beings, whom Kant defines as those capable of moral deliberation (though his definition expands in other areas) who must choose to act by laws that imply an absolute necessity. It is from this point of view that they must judge themselves and their actions.
What is Kant's formula of humanity?
Kant's Formula of Humanity reads: “So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means” (G 429). 1 By humanity, Kant here means rational nature, i.e. the capacity to set ends.
Who did Kant use to write his reflections?
In his lectures Kant used textbooks by Wolffian authors such as Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten (1714–1762) and Georg Friedrich Meier (1718–1777), but he followed them loosely and used them to structure his own reflections, which drew on a wide range of ideas of contemporary interest.
What was Kant's first work?
In 1766 Kant published his first work concerned with the possibility of metaphysics, which later became a central topic of his mature philosophy.
What are the two things Kant wrote about?
2. Kant’s project in the Critique of Pure Reason. 2.1 The crisis of the Enlightenment. 2.2 Kant’s Copernican revolution in philosophy. 3. Transcendental idealism. 3.1 The two-objects interpretation.
How many hours did Kant lecture?
Kant held this position from 1755 to 1770, during which period he would lecture an average of twenty hours per week on logic, metaphysics, and ethics, as well as mathematics, physics, and physical geography.
Why did Kant decline the chair in philosophy?
But later, as his reputation grew, he declined chairs in philosophy at Erlangen (1769) and Jena (1770) in hopes of obtaining one in Königsberg.
What is the central idea of Kant's philosophy?
The fundamental idea of Kant’s “critical philosophy” – especially in his three Critiques: the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787), the Critique of Practical Reason (1788), and the Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790) – is human autonomy. He argues that the human understanding is the source of the general laws of nature that structure all our experience; and that human reason gives itself the moral law, which is our basis for belief in God, freedom, and immortality. Therefore, scientific knowledge, morality, and religious belief are mutually consistent and secure because they all rest on the same foundation of human autonomy, which is also the final end of nature according to the teleological worldview of reflecting judgment that Kant introduces to unify the theoretical and practical parts of his philosophical system.
When did Kant become a philosopher?
In 1770, at the age of forty-six, Kant was appointed to the chair in logic and metaphysics at the Albertina, after teaching for fifteen years as an unsalaried lecturer and working since 1766 as a sublibrarian to supplement his income. Kant was turned down for the same position in 1758.
What did Kant understand about government?
Like classical liberals before him, Kant understood that governments primarily use coercion, not persuasion, to achieve their ends, so we must first determine when coercion is morally justifiable and when it is not if we are to understand the proper limits of government.
What is the book that Kant wrote about morals?
Indeed, Kant wrote an entire book on this subject—the aforementioned work, The Metaphysic of Morals —in which the differences between coercive justice and voluntary virtue are explained in considerable detail.
What does Kant mean by virtue?
By “virtue,” in this context, he meant personal moral qualities and actions that do not violate the rights of others.
Why is it irrelevant whether a person respects their rights?
Rights are a matter of law, as enforced by a government, and from this perspective it is irrelevant whether a person respects rights because he believes this to be morally required or because he fears the coercive consequences of violating rights.
What is Kant's position on the rights of resistance?
A good example of this is Kant’s position on the rights of resistance and revolution against unjust and tyrannical governments. Kant denied these rights, and his opposition was even more absolute than the opposition expressed by David Hume, Adam Smith, and other classical liberals with a conservative bent.
What is Kant's theory of justice?
Kant’s theory of justice is most fully developed in The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, which comprises Part One of The Metaphysic of Morals (not to be confused with his earlier work Groundwork [or Foundation] of the Metaphysic of Morals.) It is highly significant that the second part of The Metaphysic of Morals is titled The Doctrine of Virtue, ...
What is the key to Kant's moral and political philosophy?
The key to Kant’s moral and political philosophy is his conception of the dignity of the individual. This dignity gives to man an intrinsic worth, a value sui generis that is “above all price and admits of no equivalent.”…Kant may be regarded as the philosophical defender par excellence of the rights of man, of his equality, ...
What was Kant's point in the passage?
He was attempting to show why the right to freedom does not include the “freedom” to violate the rights of other people. Indeed, to claim any such right is a contradiction in terms.
Who translated the brackets in Kant's book?
Brackets are in the translation by John Ladd. All quotations from Kant are from this book, abbreviated MEJ.) This passage may be difficult to follow, so let’s spend a little time unpacking what Kant was getting at here.
What are the two basic types of rights that Kant divided into?
Kant divided rights into two basic types: innate and acquired. An innate right is a natural right that we are born with in virtue of our rational and volitional nature, or what Kant sometimes called our “humanity.”. There is only one basic innate right: the right to freedom.
Why does Kant identify the institution of property with freedom?
Kant comes to identify the institution of property with freedom because he sees it in a fundamental sense as an extension of the self. An object which is, he argues, my property belongs solely and exclusively to myself, and it is my right to consume or use it in whatever way I please.
What are the three corollaries of Kant's theory of justice?
First, justice is concerned only with external actions by which one person can influence other people, whether directly or indirectly. Second, justice is not concerned with the desires, wishes, or needs of other people. These matters pertain to the voluntary ...
What is the moral sanction of a positive?
Thus, for every individual, a right is the moral sanction of a positive —of his freedom to act on his own judgment, for his own goals, by his own voluntary, uncoerced choice. As to his neighbors, his rights impose no obligations on them except of a negative kind: to abstain from violating his rights.
Who said without property rights, no other rights are possible?
According to Rand, “Without property rights, no other rights are possible.”. Kant discussed property rights in more detail than Rand did, and at times his defense may seem convoluted to the modern reader. But the following summary by Howard Williams ( Kant’s Political Philosophy, St. Martin’s Press, 1983, p.
What is Kant's conclusion about synthetic judgment?
Kant argues that there are synthetic judgments such as the connection of cause and effect (e.g., "... Every effect has a cause.") where no analysis of the subject will produce the predicate. Kant reasons that statements such as those found in geometry and Newtonian physics are synthetic judgments. Kant uses the classical example of 7 + 5 = 12. No amount of analysis will find 12 in either 7 or 5. Thus Kant arrives at the conclusion that all pure mathematics is synthetic though a priori; the number 7 is seven and the number 5 is five and the number 12 is twelve and the same principle applies to other numerals; in other words, they are universal and necessary. For Kant then, mathematics is synthetic judgment a priori. Conventional reasoning would have regarded such an equation to be analytic a priori by considering both 7 and 5 to be part of one subject being analyzed, however Kant looked upon 7 and 5 as two separate values, with the value of five being applied to that of 7 and synthetically arriving at the logical conclusion that they equal 12. This conclusion led Kant into a new problem as he wanted to establish how this could be possible: How is pure mathematics possible? This also led him to inquire whether it could be possible to ground synthetic a priori knowledge for a study of metaphysics, because most of the principles of metaphysics from Plato through to Kant's immediate predecessors made assertions about the world or about God or about the soul that were not self-evident but which could not be derived from empirical observation (B18-24). For Kant, all post-Cartesian metaphysics is mistaken from its very beginning: the empiricists are mistaken because they assert that it is not possible to go beyond experience and the dogmatists are mistaken because they assert that it is possible to go beyond experience through theoretical reason.
What is the book of Kant?
Critique of Pure Reason ( German: Kritik der reinen Vernunft; 1781; second edition 1787) is a book by the German philosopher Immanuel Kant, in which the author seeks to determine the limits and scope of metaphysics. Also referred to as Kant's "First Critique", it was followed by his Critique of Practical Reason (1788) and Critique of Judgment ...
What is transcendental idealism?
Kant's transcendental idealism should be distinguished from idealistic systems such as that of George Berkeley. While Kant claimed that phenomena depend upon the conditions of sensibility, space and time, and on the synthesizing activity of the mind manifested in the rule-based structuring of perceptions into a world of objects, this thesis is not equivalent to mind-dependence in the sense of Berkeley's idealism. Kant defines transcendental idealism :
How did the critique of pure reason influence philosophy?
The Critique of Pure Reason has exerted an enduring influence on Western philosophy. The constructive aspect of the work, Kant's attempt to ground the conditions for the possibility of objects in the conditions of experience, helped bring about the development of German idealism. The work also influenced Young Hegelians such as Bruno Bauer, Ludwig Feuerbach and Karl Marx, and also, Friedrich Nietzsche, whose philosophy has been seen as a form of "radical Kantianism" by Howard Caygill. Other interpretations of the Critique by philosophers and historians of philosophy have stressed different aspects of the work. The late 19th-century neo-Kantians Hermann Cohen and Heinrich Rickert focused on its philosophical justification of science, Martin Heidegger and Heinz Heimsoeth on aspects of ontology, and Peter Strawson on the limits of reason within the boundaries of sensory experience. Hannah Arendt and Jean-François Lyotard dealt with its work of orientation of a limited understanding in the field of world history. According to Homer W. Smith ,
How does pure reason erroneously try to operate beyond the limits of possible experience?
One of the ways that pure reason erroneously tries to operate beyond the limits of possible experience is when it thinks that there is an immortal Soul in every person. Its proofs, however, are paralogisms, or the results of false reasoning.
What is the meaning of the term "analytic" in Kant's theory?
Before Kant, it was generally held that truths of reason must be analytic, meaning that what is stated in the predicate must already be present in the subject (e.g., "An intelligent man is intelligent" or "An intelligent man is a man").
Who denounced the anonymous review of Pure Reason?
The review was denounced by Kant, but defended by Kant's empiricist critics, and the resulting controversy drew attention to the Critique of Pure Reason. Kant believed that the anonymous review was biased and deliberately misunderstood his views.
Life and Works
- Immanuel Kant was born April 22, 1724 in Königsberg, near thesoutheastern shore of the Baltic Sea. Today Königsberg has beenrenamed Kaliningrad and is part of Russia. But during Kant’s lifetimeKönigsberg was the capital of East Prussia, and its dominantlanguage was German. Though geographically remote from the rest ofPrussia and other German cities, Königsberg wa…
Kant’s Project in The Critique of Pure Reason
- The main topic of the Critique of Pure Reason is the possibility ofmetaphysics, understood in a specific way. Kant defines metaphysics interms of “the cognitions after which reason might striveindependently of all experience,” and his goal in the book is toreach a “decision about the possibility or impossibility of ametaphysics in general, and the determination of its sources, as …
Transcendental Idealism
- Perhaps the central and most controversial thesis of the Critique ofPure Reason is that human beings experience only appearances, notthings in themselves; and that space and time are only subjective formsof human intuition that would not subsist in themselves if one were toabstract from all subjective conditions of human intuition. Kant callsthis t...
The Transcendental Deduction
- The transcendental deduction is the central argument of the Critiqueof Pure Reason and one of the most complex and difficult texts in thehistory of philosophy. Given its complexity, there are naturally manydifferent ways of interpreting the deduction.[14]This briefoverview provides one perspective on some of its main ideas. The transcendental deduction occurs in the part of the C…
Morality and Freedom
- Having examined two central parts of Kant’s positive project intheoretical philosophy from the Critique of Pure Reason, transcendentalidealism and the transcendental deduction, let us now turn to hispractical philosophy in the Critique of Practical Reason. Since Kant’sphilosophy is deeply systematic, this section begins with a preliminarylook at how his theoretical and practica…
The Highest Good and Practical Postulates
- Kant holds that reason unavoidably produces not only consciousnessof the moral law but also the idea of a world in which there is bothcomplete virtue and complete happiness, which he calls the highestgood. Our duty to promote the highest good, on Kant’s view, is the sumof all moral duties, and we can fulfill this duty only if we believethat the highest good is a possible state of affairs. F…
The Unity of Nature and Freedom
- This final section briefly discusses how Kant attempts to unify thetheoretical and practical parts of his philosophical system in theCritique of the Power of Judgment.