Treatment FAQ

withholding or withdrawing treatment should be considered when

by Mr. Torrey Schaefer Published 3 years ago Updated 2 years ago
image

To withhold or withdraw some forms of treatment, in fact, is the simplest way to defend patients from possibly unwanted negative consequences of life-prolonging medical technology, especially when the patient’s quality of life lowers dramatically.

When is it justifiable to discontinue life-sustaining treatments? If the patient has the ability to make decisions, fully understands the consequences of their decision, and states they no longer want a treatment, it is justifiable to withdraw the treatment.

Full Answer

Should you withhold or withdraw treatment?

Jul 16, 2014 · This makes it very much likely that controversy will continue to centre on the practice of withholding and withdrawing medical treatment, with particular reference to life-sustaining treatments . To withhold or withdraw some forms of treatment, in fact, is the simplest way to defend patients from possibly unwanted negative consequences of life-prolonging …

When facing decisions about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment the physician?

Oct 01, 2000 · There is a strong general consensus that withdrawal or withholding of treatment is a decision that allows the disease to progress on its natural course. It …

Will controversy continue to centre on withholding and withdrawing medical treatment?

1. Determination that a life-sustaining treatment should be withdrawn or withheld A. Definition A life-sustaining intervention may, in certain circumstances, be withdrawn or withheld when there is no reasonable medical probability that it would be effective. (For example, continued ventilatory support in a patient with progressive respiratory failure despite maximal respiratory management

Is withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment ethical?

Mar 13, 2017 · Withholding or Withdrawing Treatment at the End of Life. ... The opinion of the patient or his relatives should not be considered, as it is a medical decision and it is not in their capacity to reach such a decision [Albar, 2007, pp. 635–636].

image

When deciding whether to withdraw or withhold treatment it is important to?

When facing decisions about withholding or withdrawing life- sustaining treatment the physician should: Review with the patient the individual's advance directive, if there is one. Otherwise, elicit the patient's values, goals for care, and treatment preferences.

What is withholding and withdrawing treatment?

Such decisions can essentially take one of two forms: withdrawing – the removal of a therapy that has been started in an attempt to sustain life but is not, or is no longer, effective – and withholding – the decision not to make further therapeutic interventions.Mar 4, 2005

How do you know when to withdraw from care?

In general, treatment is withdrawn when death is felt to be inevitable despite continued treatment. This would typically be when dysfunction in three or more organ systems persists or worsens despite active treatment or in cases such as multiple organ failure in patients with failed bone marrow transplantation.

What does withholding treatment mean?

(5) the term “withholding of medically indicated treatment” means the failure to respond to the infant's life-threatening conditions by providing treatment (including appropriate nutrition, hydration, and medication) which, in the treating physician's or physicians' reasonable medical judgment, will be most likely to ...

When withdrawing and withholding life sustaining interventions is appropriate?

Ethical Considerations in Managing Critically Ill Patients The goal of withdrawing life sustaining treatment is to remove treatments that are no longer desired or do not provide comfort to the patient. 2. The withholding of life-sustaining treatments is morally and legally equivalent to their withdrawal.

Is withdrawal of treatment considered euthanasia?

No. A health professional does not perform euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide by withholding or withdrawing treatment even if that treatment is needed to keep the person alive.

Is it justifiable to withhold or withdraw care because of costs?

While there is a natural tendency to believe this, there is no ethical distinction between withholding and withdrawing treatment. In numerous legal cases, courts have found that it is equally justifiable to withdraw as to withhold life-sustaining treatments.

What is withdrawal in nursing?

Withdrawal from nursing courses constitutes a disruption in progression and requires that a student seek reinstatement to the program. Students must submit a formal written request to the Admission, Progression, and Graduation (APG) Committee at least one semester in advance of wishing to return.

Who makes the decision to withdraw treatment?

Ideally, there should be consensus among the entire clinical team who have been heavily involved in the patients care, that it is appropriate to withhold or withdraw aggressive treatment. Usually two or more senior doctors, one of whom must be an ICU consultant, will agree on the decision.

When can you withdraw from life support?

What is the best way to withdraw life support? The goal of withdrawing life support when death is expected is to remove treatments that are no longer desired or indicated and that do not provide comfort to the patient.

When is the primary goal of the patient?

When the primary goal of the patient is to maximize the quantity of life. When the patient is stable or improving, and the intervention has a reasonable chance of reaching the patient's goals. When the risk/benefit ratio is unclear, or the evolution of the disease is uncertain.

Is ventilator withdrawal euthanasia?

If the intent is to secure comfort, not death; if the medications are chosen for and titrated to the patient's symptoms; if the medications are not administered with the primary intent to cause death, then ventilator withdrawal and pain treatment are not euthanasia.

What is the difference between withholding and withdrawing?

Withholding treatment refers to not beginning a particular treatment, whereas withdrawing treatment refers to stopping a treatment that has been started : “Something temporal, by definition, distinguishes withholding from withdrawing: the historical fact of the initiation of therapy” (Sulmasy and Sugarman, 1994, p. 218). In the United States the American Medical Association (AMA) (1996) takes the position that there is “no ethical distinction between withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatment.” Howard Brody (1995) agrees that there is no useful distinction between withholding and withdrawing, and argues that the purported distinction can distract attention from the ethically relevant issues of the patient’s wishes and the effect of the treatment (p. 716).

What is the term for a physician who administers a lethal drug?

Some people use the term euthanasia to refer to situations in which a physician actually administers a lethal drug, and use the term physician-assisted suicide to refer to situations in which a physician provides a drug that the patient self-administers (Pickett, 2009, p. 335). In contrast, Beauchamp and others (2008) use ...

Why would a utilitarian support efforts that would result in limiting expensive medical treatments for dying patients

Utilitarians would also support efforts that would result in limiting expensive medical treatments for dying patients, on the ground that society would benefit more by allocating money and resources to individuals who could continue to serve the needs of society.

When is medically assisted nutrition optional?

Medically assisted nutrition and hydration become morally optional when they cannot reasonably be expected to prolong life or when they would be “excessively burdensome for the patient or [would] cause significant physical discomfort, for example resulting from complications in the use of the means employed.”.

Is it a right to decline medical treatment?

According to the World Medical Association (2005), “the right to decline medical treatment is a basic right of the patient and the physician does not act unethically even if respecting such a wish results in the death of the patient.”. In the United States the American Medical Association (1996) agrees that the “principle ...

Can a physician prescribe a drug that can be expected to cause death?

Thus, under the principles of medical ethics in the United States, physicians may prescribe or administer drugs that can reasonably be expected to make their patients die more quickly, so long as the physicians intend only to relieve suffering and do not intend to cause death.

image
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9