Treatment FAQ

why russia is still a threat and our treatment is not a cold war relic

by Jesus Nitzsche Published 2 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Is Russia really a threat to America?

Russia, it seems, is wedded to challenging the U.S. both at home and abroad. But the conventional wisdom is wrong: Although any state with a lot of nuclear weapons is a potential threat, the Russian challenge is overblown.

Why do we still treat Russia like the evil empire?

Why do we still treat Russia like the Evil Empire? As U.S. intelligence agencies warned that Russia was moving troops close to the Ukrainian border this fall, you could be forgiven for thinking that the Cold War had never ended.

Is Russia ready to plunge the world into a nuclear war?

The past 10 days have echoed with the scary nuclear brinksmanship of that era as Russia ratcheted up concerns it was ready to plunge the world into an exchange of weapons humanity might not survive.

Is Russia the villain in the Cold War?

‘Rocky IV’ and ‘Miracle on Ice’: The Cold War culture of Russia as the villain is back - The Washington Post Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has resurrected the Cold-War narrative of Russia as villain, which traversed the McCarthy hearings, spy novels, "Miracle on Ice" and "Rocky IV."

Who has more nukes Russia or the US?

RussiaBoth nations' nuclear arsenals also include hundreds of shorter-range nuclear weapons, which are not covered by any treaty. Currently, Russia has nearly 2,000 of those, about 10 times as many as the United States, according to the most widely cited nongovernmental estimates.

Who would win a war between US and Russia?

The USA also has an overwhelming advantage over Russia in terms of conventional forces. Russia still has incredible military might, even if it is not as large as NATO's, with more than a million active troops.

Can Russian nuclear missiles reach the US?

New START limits all Russian deployed intercontinental-range nuclear weapons, including every Russian nuclear warhead that is loaded onto an intercontinental-range ballistic missile that can reach the United States in approximately 30 minutes.

What country has the most nuclear weapons?

Nuclear Warheads Currently in Possession by CountriesCountryMilitary StockpileTotal InventoryUnited States3,7085,428France290290China350350United Kingdom1802256 more rows•Mar 21, 2022

Is Russia's army stronger than the US?

In short, Russia is ranked 2nd out of 140 in military strength while the US is ranked 1st. As per the army population, Russia has 142,320,790 soldiers while The US has 334,998,398 soldiers. The available manpower is 69,737,187 with Russia and 147,399,295 with the United States.

Is NATO bigger than Russia?

The collective military capabilities of the 30 countries that make up NATO outnumber Russia in terms of aircraft, at 20,723 to 4,173, and in naval power, with 2,049 military ships, to 605....Comparison of the military capabilities of NATO and Russia as of 2022.CharacteristicNATORussiaTotal helicopters8,4851,54312 more rows•Mar 3, 2022

Can US stop a nuclear missile?

The US only has a limited ability to destroy an incoming nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile, a study released last month by the American Physical Society concluded.

What cities are most likely to be nuked?

Redlener identified six cities that have the greatest likelihood of being attacked: New York, Chicago, Washington D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston. Only New York, Washington D.C., and Los Angeles' emergency management websites give ways to respond to a radioactive disaster.

How many nukes would it take to destroy the world?

This is why another study had been conducted in 2018 testing a similar scenario that also concluded that it would take 100 nuclear bombs to end this world. What is scarier is that within this world there are 13,080 ready-to-use nuclear warheads and yet it takes such a small amount.

How many nukes would it take to destroy the US?

The absolute doomsday scenario is a “nuclear winter.” For that to happen, the US and Russia would have to use about 2,000 nukes each and destroy major cities and targets, Toon told me.

Can the UK stop a nuclear missile?

The UK maintains only the minimum amount of destructive power needed to guarantee our deterrent remains credible and effective against the full range of state nuclear threats. Our submarines on patrol are at several days' notice to fire and, since 1994, we do not target our missiles at any state.

Which country is best missile technology?

With the test of the PAD missile, India became the fourth country to have successfully developed an Anti-ballistic missile system, after United States, Russia and Israel.

What did Gorbachev say about nuclear weapons?

All nations should declare, all nations, nuclear weapons must be destroyed. To save ourselves and our planet.".

Why did Medvedev step down?

But then Medvedev stepped down to make way for Putin’s return. After Putin’s re-election in 2012, U.S.-Russian relations went into free-fall. There were large demonstrations in Russia against Putin after the election, and he apparently believed they were organized and financed by the United States.

What did George Kennan say about NATO?

As Russia expert George Kennan said in 1998, “I think [NATO expansion] is the beginning of a new Cold War. I think the Russians will gradually react quite adversely and it will affect their policies. I think it is a tragic mistake.”.

Why was Sochi the host of the 2014 Olympics?

In 2014, Sochi hosted the Winter Olympics, an impressive event meant to show the world that Russia was back. (Russian athletes were discovered to have used illegal drugs, and were barred from the next Winter Games in South Korea.)

When did the Baltic states join NATO?

When the alliance added the Baltic states in 2004, Moscow viewed it as marching that threat up to its border. With a frightful lack of forethought, the United States and NATO essentially acted as if Moscow’s concerns did not matter.

Who took over from Vladimir Putin?

For a while it seemed to work, and President Dmitri Medvedev (who took over temporarily from President Vladimir Putin) had a more positive attitude toward Washington. During this brief opening, the New START treaty was signed in 2010. But then Medvedev stepped down to make way for Putin’s return.

Who decried NATO expansion?

In an open letter to President Clinton, more than 40 foreign policy experts —Bill Bradley, Sam Nunn, Gary Hart, Paul Nitze, Robert McNamara, and more — decried NATO expansion as expensive and unnecessary. No one listened.

What is the Russian intervention?

Far from premeditated aggrandizement, Russian intervention is best understood as a response to events on the ground. After all, Moscow has long asserted Georgia and Ukraine to be central to its security, and only intervened militarily when the EU and NATO looked ready to bring the states into their orbit.

Is Russia a problem child?

Instead, Russia is a problem child in international relations that can, and should, be coolly managed. The case for Russia as a threat is overhyped by hawks and threat inflators. Outside the nuclear realm (addressed below), Russia's military might is a shadow of the USSR's.

Is Russia a nuclear power?

Above all, Russia remains a nuclear power with the military capacity to destroy the U .S. The net result is obvious: Russia cannot be discounted. Still, the solution is not to overstate the Russian threat, but to recognize that the U.S. needs to address the Russian challenge in cool, hardheaded fashion.

Military response required

The vision of Russia as “the greatest threat” would almost inevitably require some military response. It is not a coincidence, for example, that General Dunford during the same confirmation hearing expressed his support for supplying Ukraine with lethal arms. However, such a response is likely to only escalate the conflict.

Restoring Great Power status

By describing Russia as “the greatest threat” to the US security, US officials and politicians only strengthen Moscow’s determination to continue with its course of actions. This unintended consequence of US rhetoric can be explained by a basic psychological mechanism.

Fuelling anti-US sentiment

Public statements about Russia’s threat feed into already exceptionally high levels of anti-Americanism in Russian society. According to findings of the Pew Research Center, the share of Russian respondents who hold unfavourable views of the US has risen to 81% in 2015 – a striking increase compared to 33% in 2002.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9