There would be more slave states than free states. What best describes the treatment of American Indians during the early nineteenth century? Their lands were taken and they had no rights as citizens.
Full Answer
Was the treatment of Native Americans during the 19th century justified?
The treatment of the Native Americans during the 19 th century was justified by the actions of the United State government, the growing economy of the nation, and the white people’s opinion about the Indians. As the Native Americans were pushed off their homelands, many put up a resistance.
Why was the removal of the Native Americans needed?
The removal of the Native Americans was needed for, “…the opening of the vast American lands to agriculture, to commerce, to markets, to money…” (Zinn 126). With the age of industrialization growing rapidly, new land was required for the manufacturing and exporting of goods that would strengthen the country’s economy.
What was the education like for Native Americans in the 1800s?
They received an American education and were also given American clothes. While at the schools, the Native Americans were required to perform manual labor to contribute to the upkeep of the school, but were not allowed to be compensated for their work.
What characterized American agriculture in the last quarter of the nineteenth century?
rising commodity prices In the last quarter of the nineteenth century, American agriculture was characterized by an increase in acres under civilization Which of the following pairs of immigrant groups were most prominent in the construction of the first transcontinental railroad?
What happened to the Indians during the 19th century?
In the previous century, the Indian Removal Act, signed by President Andrew Jackson on 28 May 1830, led to the forced relocation of indigenous people. By the end of the 19th-century, Indian Schools were further enforcing the erosion of language, customs and dress.
How were Native Americans treated 1900?
By the turn of the century in 1900, most remaining Native Americans in California, like other Native Americans, had been forced, tricked, or paid to leave their ancestral lands.
What was happening with Native Americans throughout the 19th century?
The forced relocation became known as the Trail of Tears. In the mid-19th century, the U.S. government pursued a policy known as "allotment and assimilation." Under the General Allotment Act of 1887, the government was allowed to divide tribal land into small parcels for individual members.
What was the treatment of the Natives?
The federal government's treatment towards native reservations is similar to that of an absentee parent: neglecting to attend to their needs yet refusing to give them the freedom and ability to grow on their own. Throughout history, natives have been given three dismal choices: assimilation, relocation, or genocide.
How were Native Americans affected by the American Revolution?
It also affected Native Americans by opening up western settlement and creating governments hostile to their territorial claims. Even more broadly, the Revolution ended the mercantilist economy, opening new opportunities in trade and manufacturing.
How were Native American cultures threatened in the 1800s?
How were Native American cultures threatened in the 1800s? Native Americans were forced onto reservations. They also were not immune to the diseases.
What happened to Native Americans in the late 19th century?
After siding with the French in numerous battles during the French and Indian War and eventually being forcibly removed from their homes under Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Act, Native American populations were diminished in size and territory by the end of the 19th century.
What was the Indian problem?
In the 1950s, the United States came up with a plan to solve what it called the "Indian Problem." It would assimilate Native Americans by moving them to cities and eliminating reservations. The 20-year campaign failed to erase Native Americans, but its effects on Indian Country are still felt today.
What did Native American tribes experience during the early 1800s?
During the early 1800s, Native American tribes experienced which of the following? They lost land as the nation expanded westward. They challenged the authority of the United States government over them. They suffered at the hands of Andrew Jackson.
How were Native Americans treated in the 1800's?
Taking Apart a Nation The act destroyed tribal tradition of communal land ownership. Many Native Americans were cheated out of their allotments or were forced to sell them. Ultimately, Native Americans lost millions of acres of Western native lands. Poverty among Native Americans became widespread.
How did the conquistadors treat the natives?
The Spanish conquistadors, who went to Hispaniola and then to other Caribbean islands and finally to the mainland, were rough and violent. They took what they wanted, and when the Indians resisted--or even when they did not--the conquistadors attacked and slaughtered them.
What happened to the Native Americans in the South when the white settlers arrived in the early 1800s?
After European explorers reached the West Coast in the 1770s, smallpox rapidly killed at least 30% of Northwest Coast Native Americans. For the next 80 to 100 years, smallpox and other diseases devastated native populations in the region.
How were Native Americans treated during the 19th century?
The treatment of the Native Americans during the 19 th century was justified by the actions of the United State government, the growing economy of the nation, and the white people’s opinion about the Indians. As the Native Americans were pushed off their homelands, many put up a resistance. Despite their best efforts they were forced to migrate; the main reason behind it being “human progress”. Over 200 years later, their lands which once consisted of millions of acres have now been reduced to minuscule reservations. One can only wonder if it could have been different, if white settlers and Native Americans could have learned from one another to create a lasting peace between them.
What was the significance of the Native Americans in the 19th century?
The arrival of the Europeans to the New World started an age of exploration as well as subjugation of the natives who populated the continent.
What was the difference between Native Americans and White men?
The basic difference was that Native Americans lacked the technology to accomplish their economic domination of other tribes/Indian nations as efficiently as the "White man". Christopher Antony Meade from Gillingham Kent. United Kingdom on September 11, 2010:
What did the White settlers fear?
White settlers also feared the Native American’s religious ideas which, in the case of the prophet Tenskwatawa spoke “…of the superior virtues of Indian civilization…and the corruption of the white world”. The treatment of the Native Americans during the 19 th century was justified by the actions of the United State government, ...
What did Jefferson offer Native Americans?
It was then that president Jefferson offered the Native Americans two choices: they would either become part of white society or they would migrate west across the Mississippi. They had to give up their lands one way or another.
What tribes were fought by military force?
Military force was used against many tribes like the Creeks, who ended up losing 22 million acres of land and the Seminoles living in Florida which, according to Jacson, “…was a sanctuary for escaped slaves and for marauding Indians” (Zinn 129).
What did Andrew Jackson say about Indian removal?
This was more heavily enforced later on with Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Bill which simply stated that Indians, “…shall be free to go or stay as they please” (White 93). Most of the native tribes didn’t want to move so other measures were taken.
How did the government try to squelch the Native Americans?
government seek to squelch Native American uprisings, it also sought to stop those cultural traits from being passed to younger generations by assimilating them in boarding schools. Even religious groups felt the need to assimilate and convert these young Native Americans, and they publicized the need for money to pay them in journals that were circulated. These schools took in Native American children and attempted to erase every trace of their former Native American life. They received an American education and were also given American clothes. While at the schools, the Native Americans were required to perform manual labor to contribute to the upkeep of the school, but were not allowed to be compensated for their work.
How did cartoonists recognize the U.S. government’s fragile policies with Native Americans?
Editorial cartoonists recognized the U.S. government’s fragile policies with Native Americans by illustrating them as a house of cards. The government saw the Native Americans as a problem but did not know how to deal with them, even after trying several approaches.
What are some facts about the Trail of Tears?
policies concerning Native Americans in the Mid- and North-West United States are not covered by textbooks. Several Native American tribes were put on reservations together in locations that are not traveled by most Americans .
What was the impact of the decline of Native American autonomy in the second half of the nineteenth century?
The decline of Native American political autonomy in the second half of the nineteenth century was one of the results of increasing national authority that also irrevocably changed the character of the American West. With its powers invigorated by the demands of war, the federal government, having abolished slavery, turned in the post-war period to address its remaining, and largely western, racial and moral problem groups: the Mormons, the Chinese, and Native Americans. Native American populations, living at various stages of what nineteenth-century Americans called civilization, proved a particularly tricky segment of the population to integrate into the American body politic. The nineteenth century’s Indian “Problem” or “Question” took many forms; American policymakers had to determine what was to be done about hostile tribes still vigorously resisting relocation, how reservations would be managed, and how to “kill the Indian but save the man” through various civilizing projects. Preparing Native Americans for the new social and political order of the postwar United States necessitated new approaches to Indian policy, producing a massive and multifaceted Reconstruction program that forever altered Native American life and the contours of the American West.
Why was the army important to the Indians?
As the Indian wars that characterized the 1860s and 70s proved, the U.S. army was as important an agent of control and management in Indian affairs as any other government-sponsored agency. Sharing the same end goals, “to locate the Indians on reservations with set boundaries where they could be educated and trained for American citizenship,” the army and the Indian Office worked together in reconstructing Native American life after the Civil War. It was the military, however, that was best equipped to respond when Native Americans refused removal to reservations or when relations with encroaching white populations turned hostile. By October 1883, just as the death knell rang for the church-appointed agency system, General William T. Sherman announced the resolution of the Indian Question by military means: “I now regard the Indians as substantially eliminated from the problem of the Army. There may be spasmodic and temporary alarms, but such Indian wars as have hitherto disturbed the public peace and tranquility are not probable.” Citing the railroad and the western migration of white farmers as important developments, Sherman saw the army as a “large factor” in ending “the great battle for civilization with barbarism.” Although most of the Indian wars had concluded by the early 1880s, the Indian Problem was alive and well as most Native Americans were still living on reservations, far from reformers’ designs of total assimilation into American life and citizenship.
What was the problem of the nineteenth century?
The nineteenth century’s Indian “Problem” or “Question” took many forms; American policymakers had to determine what was to be done about hostile tribes still vigorously resisting relocation, how reservations would be managed, and how to “kill the Indian but save the man” through various civilizing projects.
How did boarding schools help Native Americans?
As one of the strongest civilizing tools available, “the boarding school, whether on or off the reservation, was the institutional manifestation of the government’s determination to completely restructure the Indians’ minds and personalities.” Designed to prepare Indian children for assimilated life, boarding schools emphasized a practical education that would individualize students by teaching them skills associated with professional trades. Indian education was also a means of Christianization, intimately tied to the concurrent project of Americanization – both would prepare Native American children for civilization and citizenship. Given the importance of formal schooling in preparing Native Americans to fully enter American society, officials used a variety of means to obtain students. Although persuasion was the much-preferred method for filling school rosters, when met with resistance “many U.S. authorities turned to more coercive means to obtain children, including the withholding of rations and the use of military force.”
What was the Peace Policy?
The Peace Policy aimed to solve the issue of Indian agency corruption by placing agency control in the hands of twelve different Christian denominations, among which the Methodists and Quaker Society of Friends dominated.
How did the Homestead Act help the West?
Railroad infrastructure and federal policies like the Homestead Act (1862) helped stimulate westward migration on an unprecedented scale. Increased federal intervention in the West also slowed the transition of the region’s territories to statehood, thereby allowing “the federal state a stronger hand in western economic and political development.”. ...
What was the impact of the Civil War on the American West?
Although the former Confederacy was the focus of many Reconstruction policies, it was the American West that was truly transformed in the decades following the Civil War. The growing power of the federal government, which helped the Union end the Civil War and enact emancipation, also had long lasting consequences for the settlement of America’s western territories. With the Civil War finished, the American military apparatus, substantially larger than it had been in the antebellum period, began to move westward, quickly transforming “the Great Plains [into] the most violent place in North America.” Railroad infrastructure and federal policies like the Homestead Act (1862) helped stimulate westward migration on an unprecedented scale. Increased federal intervention in the West also slowed the transition of the region’s territories to statehood, thereby allowing “the federal state a stronger hand in western economic and political development.”
What was the Indian policy after the Civil War?
Far from a unified and direct movement across the 19th century, from removal to reservations to land allotment, Indian policy after the Civil War was characterized by intense battles over tribal sovereignty, the assimilation goals, citizenship, landholding and land use, and state development.
What was the purpose of the Westward Expansion?
leaders sought ways to reconstruct a devastated nation, many turned to westward expansion as a mechanism to give northerners and southerners a shared goal. Simultaneously, though, the abolitionists and activists who had fought long and hard for an end to slavery saw this moment as one for a new racial politics in the postwar nation, and their ideas extended to include Native communities as well. These two competing agendas came together in a series of debates and contestations in the late 19th century to shape the way the federal government developed policies related to Native landholding and assimilation. Far from a unified and direct movement across the 19th century, from removal to reservations to land allotment, Indian policy after the Civil War was characterized by intense battles over tribal sovereignty, the assimilation goals, citizenship, landholding and land use, and state development. During this era, the Office of Indian Affairs (OIA) became a meeting ground where policymakers and reformers debated the relationship between the federal government and its citizens and wards.