Explore
Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, Volume 11, Issue 6 (Nov 2020)
What is the evidence for the treatment of personality disorder?
The Behavior Analyst Today Volume 10, Number 1 7 Assessment and Treatment of Personality Disorders: A Behavioral Perspective Rosemery O. Nelson-Gray, Christopher M. Lootens, John T. Mitchell, Christopher D. Robertson , Natalie E. Hundt, & Nathan A. Kimbrel Abstract
What is the Oxford Handbook of personality disorders?
Psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic therapy have long been used in the treatment of patients with personality disorders (PDs). The seminal work of Wilhelm Reich 1 on analysis of the patient's “character armor” laid the groundwork for this approach. More recently, other forms of psychotherapy have been widely used to treat PDs.
What are the four dimensions of personality disorder?
Otto Kernberg is one of the most illustrious and most frequently cited psychoanalysts alive. This, his most recent volume, discusses the topics that have been identified with him for the last several decades—serious personality disorders, their etiology, diagnosis and treatment, research on those treatments, the psychoanalytic theories that link what we know about these disorders …
Why has the British Psychological Society published Understanding Personality Disorder?
The evidence base for the effective treatment of personality disorders is insufficient. Most of the existing evidence on personality disorder is for the treatment of borderline personality disorder, but even this is limited by the small sample sizes and short follow-up in clinical trials, the wide range of core outcome measures used by studies, and poor control of coexisting …
How many personality disorders does the DSM-5?
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) lists 10 types of personality disorders. Personality disorders... read more , although most patients who meet criteria for one type also meet criteria for one or more others.
How many total personality disorders are there?
There are 10 specific types of personality disorders. Personality disorders are long-term patterns of behavior and inner experiences that differs significantly from what is expected. The pattern of experience and behavior begins by late adolescence or early adulthood and causes distress or problems in functioning.
How many people have complete personality disorder treatments?
According to the NIMH, 42.4 percent of people diagnosed with personality disorder are receiving treatment. The treatment depends on a person's particular personality disorder. Treatments available include medications, hospitalization and psychotherapy.
What is the main treatment for personality disorders?
Psychotherapy, also called talk therapy, is the main way to treat personality disorders.Sep 23, 2016
How many clusters of personality disorders are there?
Types of personality disorders are grouped into three clusters, based on similar characteristics and symptoms.Sep 23, 2016
What are the 4 clusters of personality disorders?
There are four types of cluster B personality disorders, each with a different set of diagnostic criteria and treatments:antisocial personality disorder.borderline personality disorder.histrionic personality disorder.narcissistic personality disorder.
What percentage of population has a personality disorder?
It is estimated that 10 percent to 13 percent of the world's population suffer from some form of personality disorder. Most personality disorders begin in the teen years, when the personality further develops and matures.Feb 2, 2018
What is the prevalence of personality disorders?
Prevalence of Personality Disorders in Adults The prevalence of any personality disorder was 9.1% and borderline personality disorder was 1.4%. Sex and race were not found to be associated with the prevalence of personality disorders.
What percentage of the population has narcissistic personality disorder?
Experts estimate that up to 5% of people have NPD. Narcissism is one of 10 personality disorders. These disorders cause people to think, feel and behave in ways that hurt themselves or others.Jun 19, 2020
What is the most effective treatment for borderline personality disorder?
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) began as a way to help manage crisis behavior, such as suicidal behavior or self-harm. It is the most commonly recommended therapy for BPD.Apr 21, 2021
What are the theories of personality?
In describing personality, we'll go through six different personality theories: psychoanalytic theory, humanistic theory, trait theory, social-cognitive theory, biological theory, and behaviorist theory.
What is the most difficult personality disorder to treat?
The flamboyant cluster includes people with histrionic, antisocial, borderline, and narcissistic personalities. Except for the borderlines -- considered the most difficult personality disorder to treat -- these patients enjoyed significantly better lives over time.Jun 28, 2002
What are the aims of personality disorder treatment?
The aims of treatments for personality disorder are more parsimonious than often suggested. Drug treatment only focuses on specific aspects of personality disorder's pathological effects, such as affective instability and cognitive–perceptual disturbances. Psychosocial treatments, mainly for borderline personality disorder, aim to reduce acute life-threatening symptoms
What are the two approaches to treating personality disorder?
The two main approaches to the treatment of personality disorder are psychosocial treatment and pharmacotherapy. Psychosocial intervention is recommended as the primary treatment for borderline personality disorder. 15.
What is the best treatment for borderline personality disorder?
Psychological or psychosocial intervention is recommended as the primary treatment for borderline personality disorder and pharmacotherapy is only advised as an adjunctive treatment.
Is there a randomised controlled trial for cluster C personality disorder?
No randomised controlled trials have been published of drug treatment of patients satisfying the full criteria of any cluster C personality disorder. However the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry guidelines
What is cluster A disorder?
People with cluster A disorders (schizoid, schizotypal, and paranoid personality disorders) are united by their social aversion, their failures to form close relationships, and their relative (compared with other clusters) indifference to these disabilities. These patients have poor self-awareness and empathic ability. Mental health professionals have made little effort to study or treat people with cluster A disorders; partly because, except perhaps those with schizotypal disorder, they do not experience loneliness or compete with or envy people who enjoy close relationships. Any treatment recommendations are indicative only, being based on clinical evidence alone. No well organised randomised controlled trials of treatment of people with cluster A disorders exist.
What is the WFSBP?
the WFSBP Task Force on Personality Disorders the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of personality disorders.
What is personality disorder?
This condition manifests as problems with cognition, emotions, and behaviour, which often affect the ability to form interpersonal relationships. It is probably the most common psychiatric disorder, and almost certainly the most underdiagnosed. Popular opinion holds that the disorder is permanent, unchanging, and largely untreatable, leading the term to become more common as a pejorative label for so-called difficult patients than as an actual diagnosis.
What is the DSM definition of personality disorder?
Implied in the DSM definition of personality disorders is the assumptionthat state factors such as anxiety and depression should not substantivelyaffect the assessment of personality pathology. DSM-IV clearly acknowl-edges that personality disorder symptoms may be manifested during peri-ods of acute illness (e.g., major depression); however, it is equally clear thatpersonality disorder symptomatology should be typical of a person’s long-term functioning and shall not be limited only to periods of acute illness(American Psychiatric Association, 1994, p. 629). Although some data dosuggest that certain normative personality features, assessed via self-reportinstruments (not necessarily personality disorder symptoms), among clini-cally depressed patients do vary over time as a function of changing levelsof depression (Hirschfeld et al., 1983), at present neither the relationshipbetween personality disorder symptoms and state disturbance within thecontext of the cross-sectional diagnostic process nor the relationshipbetween longitudinal symptom stability and state variability is resolvedunambiguously for DSM personality disorders. A well-known study thatemployed structured interviews administered by experienced clinicians(Loranger et al., 1991) found that changes in clinical state (i.e., anxiety anddepression) didnotcorrespond significantly with changes in the number ofDSM-III-R personality disorder criteria met at two points in time; this find-ing has subsequently been replicated by Loranger and Lenzenweger (1995;cf. Zimmerman, 1994). Trull and Goodwin (1993) reported that changes inmental state were not associated with either self-reported or interview-assessed personality pathology, although the levels of depression and anxi-ety characterizing the patients in his study are unusually low (perhaps notclinically significant in intensity). Current normal personality research alsoacknowledges the importance of determining the influence of state factorson trait assessment (Tellegen, 1985) and normative trait-oriented lifespanresearch methodologists have long advocated the inclusion of state factorsas important causal factors in longitudinal developmental models andresearch (Nesselroade, 1988). Therefore, a major focus of future researchin personality pathology should be further clarification of the effect of anx-iety and depression on both cross-sectional personality disorders symptomand personality trait assessment as well as the effect of such state factors onthe longitudinal stability and change of personality disorders symptomsand traits. Any major theory of personality disorder must incorporate andaddress the role of state disturbances in the development and manifestationof personality pathology.
What is the task of future theorizing and empirical research in per-sonality disorders?
To our minds, the task of future theorizing and empirical research in per-sonality disorders is the effective integration of mind, brain, and behavior.Any comprehensive model of complex human behavior, particularly formsof psychopathology, will require a clear and genuine integration of ideasand research findings that cut across the levels of analysis linking mind,brain, and behavior. One thing is quite clear to us, as well as to the contri-butors of this volume, monolithic theories existing at but one level of analy-sis are sure to fail in their explanation of complex human behavior. Forexample, for years normative developmental psychologists have viewedpersonality and emotional development almost exclusively in terms ofpsychosocial influences, much to the exclusion of genetic and biologicalfactors. Indeed, David Rowe (1994), the late developmental behavioralgeneticist, has termed this view of personality and psychological develop-ment “socialization science,” and he has offered a pungent criticism of sucha monolithic model, demonstrating effectively the relative importance ofgenetic factors vis-a-vis psychosocial influences for personality de-velopment. We maintain a similar position with respect to personalitydisorders—for example, personality disorders are not likely to be under-stood or explained solely in terms of psychosocial influences. A genuineintegration of genetic factors, neurotransmitter models, and other neurobi-ological processes with psychosocial, cognitive, and environmental factorswill be required to advance our knowledge of the personality disorders.The best models in some ultimate sense will be those that integrate acrossthese levels (e.g., Meehl, 1990; see also Meehl, 1972). The importance ofgenetic factors in both normative and pathological development is indisput-able (DiLalla, 2004; Plomin et al., 2000; Plomin et al., 2003; Rowe, 1994;Rutter, 1991; Rutter & Silberg, 2002) and the essential role of neurobiolo-gical factors in temperament (e.g., Kagan, 1994), emotion (Ekman &Davidson, 1994), personality development (e.g., Depue & Lenzenweger,2001, Chapter 8, this volume), and the emergence of psychopathology(e.g., Breslin & Weinberger, 1990; Cocarro & Murphy, 1990; Davidson,Pizzagalli, Nitschke, & Putnam, 2002; Grace, 1991) is axiomatic, somewould even say confirmed. The meaningful integration of brain, emotion,behavior, and environmental influences currently represents an exception-ally active research area in various areas of psychological science, especiallycognition and personality—our belief is that personality disorders researchwill necessarily have to strive for similar integrative work for genuineadvances to occur. Our contributors are clearly leading the way in this con-nection. For example, Depue and Lenzenweger (Chapter 8) seek to inte-grate personality, behavior, and neurobiology in their model, Kernberg andCaligor (Chapter 3) propose complex interactions among temperament,trauma, and early experience, and Pretzer and Beck (Chapter 2) suggestthat biased cognition must be understood within a matrix that incorporatesaffect and emotion as well as interpersonal factors. Indeed, interesting dif-ferences have emerged among our theorists, for example, Kernberg andCaligor (Chapter 3) argue that neurobiological factors, operating throughtemperament, have more of amediatingrole in the determination of per-sonality pathology, whereas Depue and Lenzenweger (Chapter 8) cast neu-robiological processes, especially the role of serotonin, inmodulatingframework. This is precisely the type of debate and discussion that will notonly provide useful heuristics for future research directed at integratingmind, brain, and behavior but will ultimately allow us to better understandand care for our patients.
What causes personality disorders?
Personality disorders are caused by a combination of biological, psychological and social factors. Twin and adoption studies looking at healthy personalities have found between 40 and 50 per cent of variation between participants is explained by genetic inheritance.
What are the Big Five personality dimensions?
Most psychologists now agree that differences in personality can largely be accounted for by variation in the ‘Big Five’ personality dimensions of neuroticism vs. stability, extraversion vs. introversion, agreeableness vs. antagonism, conscientiousness vs. lack of self-discipline, and openness to experience vs. rigidity.
Can personality disorder be treated?
Despite widespread belief to the contrary, personality disorder can be successfully treated. ‘Historically, there has been a tendency to assume that people with personality disorder are untreatable, as if treatability were a characteristic of those given this label rather than a reflection of our current state of knowledge,’ the report says.
What are the causes of PD?
A father’s antisocial behaviour, parental alcoholism and a chronic failure by parents to supervise or discipline their children have also all been linked with PD. Of course, many people endure terrible experiences without going on to develop a personality disorder.
Is personality disorder a stigma?
TO many, the term personality disorder (PD) has become synonymous with stigma and confusion . It’s said that if psychologists cannot agree on what exactly personality is or how to measure it, then surely it can’t be meaningful or justified for clinicians to label someone’s personality as disordered.