The nexus of the juvenile justice system and adolescent treatment programs is the fact that they are invariably linked by similar patterns especially among serious offenders. The latter depends on the former to access such individuals and provide quality and continuing care.
Full Answer
What is the juvenile justice system?
System Linkages Between the Juvenile Justice and Adolescent Treatment System. Published on by College Writer. An effective juvenile justice system is one that offers a host of professional and empirically tested supervision and treatment programs to the youth within the system. A system is effective if it provides the proper treatment programs to those within and those …
What is the role of the justice system in youth health?
Involvement in the juvenile justice system is unfortunately a reality for many substance-abusing adolescents, but it presents a valuable opportunity for intervention. Substance use treatment can be incorporated into the juvenile justice system in several ways. These include: screening and assessment for drug abuse upon arrest
Does juvenile drug use increase among juvenile detainees?
What are the system linkages between the juvenile justice and adolescent treatment system? Write a 750-word paper regarding the role of drugs as part of youth culture. Be sure to include a title page, introduction, conclusion, in-text citations, a minimum of five scholarly sources, and a reference section. Your paper should address the following:
Does juvenile justice involvement lead to adult mental health problems?
System Linkages between the Juvenile Justice and Adolescent Treatment System With the US, all the 50 states hold significant authority and application of substance abuse treatment for adolescents, with ample differentiation throughout the country.
What are two major differences between the juvenile justice system and the criminal justice system?
How is the juvenile justice system different from other systems of law?
What is treatment in the juvenile justice system?
An examination of 200 studies published between 1950 and 1995 found that the most effective interventions for serious and violent juvenile offenders were interpersonal skills training, individual counseling, and behavioral programs (Lipsey and Wilson, 1998).
How is the juvenile justice system similar?
In both court systems, adults and juveniles keep many of the same rights, such as: The right to an attorney. The right to cross-examine and confront the witnesses against you. The right to not incriminate yourself.
Why is the juvenile justice system different?
How is the juvenile justice system different and what are their goals?
Community safety is a shared goal, but unlike the adult court system, the juvenile justice system does not recognize punishment as a legitimate purpose. Rather, its stated goal is to help young people avoid future delinquency and mature into law-abiding adults.Dec 12, 2020
What do the juvenile justice system and the criminal justice system have in common quizlet?
How are juveniles treated differently than adults in the criminal justice system?
Why is juvenile justice system needed?
What are the major similarities and differences between the juvenile justice system and the adult system?
Whereas adults are charged with crimes, juveniles are charged with delinquent acts unless the juvenile is being tried as an adult. Charges filed against adults are conferred via a document known as a complaint, but juveniles are charged by way of petition.Oct 3, 2019
What is the difference between adolescence and juvenile?
is that juvenile is a prepubescent child while adolescent is a teenager; a juvenile after puberty.
What is the difference between a juvenile and a juvenile delinquent?
What is transition age youth?
Although adolescents are the primary focus of juvenile justice, a significant number of young people involved with this system are considered transition age youth (i.e., 16–25 years of age). The aim of this review is to summarize the specific needs of transition age youth with mental health conditions involved with the juvenile justice system, identify the multiple service systems relevant to this group, and offer recommendations for policies and practice. A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify and synthesize the literature. Findings highlight the paucity of research specific to transition age youth. Thus, we also summarized relevant research on justice-involved adolescents, with a focus evaluating its potential relevance in the context of the unique milestones of the transition age, including finishing one’s education, setting and working towards vocational goals, and transitioning from ones’ family of origin to more independent living situations. Existing programs and initiatives relevant to transition age youth with mental health conditions are highlighted, and nine specific recommendations for policy and practice are offered.
What are the barriers to evidence based mental health care?
One barrier to evidence-based mental health treatment is lack of health care coverage. Various Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions increase availability of coverage for young adults but there are reasons to be skeptical about the effectiveness of such reforms for transition age youth with substantial mental health morbidity. Studies of health care reform in Massachusetts found increased enrollment for young adults in Medicaid and healthcare exchanges ( Gettens, Mitra, Henry, & Himmelstein, 2011; Long, Yemane, & Stockley, 2010) but worse enrollment among adults with behavioral health problems ( Capoccia, Croze, Cohen, & O’Brien, 2013 ). The effects of ACA on health care coverage should be monitored among vulnerable youth. In addition, improving coordination of care and linkage to services are important but will only be effective if quality mental health services are available in young adults’ communities.
What is a diversion program?
Diversion programs provide alternatives to formal justice system sanctions, typically for first-time offenders, and often provide treatment in lieu of punishment (see Chapin & Griffin, 2005 for a review). One meta-analysis did not find significant reductions in recidivism, even for diversion programs that specifically targeted mental health needs ( Schwalbe, Gearing, MacKenzie, Brewer, & Ibrahim, 2012 ). However, when evidence-based interventions for adolescent delinquent behaviors (e.g., MST, Functional Family Therapy) were included in diversion plans, results were promising. Similar to these findings, preliminary results from Ohio’s Behavioral Health Juvenile Justice program suggest that a diversion program that provides evidence- and community-based behavioral health treatment is effective in improving both delinquency and behavioral health outcomes ( Kretschmar, Butcher, Flannery, & Singer, 2014 ). Thus, diversion programs may be effective when evidence-based treatments are available in youth’s communities. Further, diversion programs reduce time in locked settings, a contributor to developmental delays ( Chung et al., 2005 ). For these reasons, diversion programs should be tailored to meet the needs of transition age youth with mental health problems and examined as alternatives to formal sanctions.
What is Project Connect?
Features include cooperative agreements between probation and mental health, facilitated mental health referrals, systematic mental health screening, and training for probation officers. In a sample of young probationers (mean age 14), this program successfully increased access to mental health services. Although it has been studied only with adolescents, Project Connect is an example of how to increase interagency collaboration, an outcome sorely needed for transition age youth.
What is the IDEA for special education?
IDEA-mandated individualized education programming requires transition planning for higher education and employment. Further, special education services can continue through age 21 for youth seeking a diploma. However, services are not consistently and effectively implemented and can be poorly suited for special education related to emotional or behavioral disorders ( Geneen & Powers, 2006; Wagner & Davis, 2006 ).
Who is the Dawn Project?
The Dawn Project: A model for responding to the needs of children with emotional and behavioral challenges and their families. Community Mental Health Journal. 2003;39:63–74. [ PubMed] [ Google Scholar]
What is wraparound services?
Wraparound services use a system of care philosophy, emphasizing maintenance of youth in the least restrictive environment through intensive coordination of multiple services ( Bruns et al., 2004 ). The Connections program in Washington state is one of the most rigorously studied wraparound programs for youth up to age 18 with mental health problems ( Pullman et al., 2006 ). Each family is assigned to a team of professionals, including a mental health care coordinator, a probation counselor, a family assistance specialist for emotional support and practical assistance, and a juvenile services associate for mentoring and aid with the treatment plan. Youth in this program were less likely to recidivate in general and have felony offenses in particular, and they served less detention time than comparison youth ( Pullman et al., 2006 ). Similar programs have also shown promise in reducing recidivism ( Anderson, Wright, Kooreman, Mohr, & Russell, 2003; Kamradt, 2000 ), though one program produced positive effects on educational outcomes and police contacts but not on arrests or incarceration ( Carney & Buttell, 2003 ). However, the comparative effectiveness of the wraparound approaches compared to case management for reduction of mental health symptoms has not been established (see Bruns et al., 2015 ). Moreover, evaluations have not focused on older transition age youth (i.e., over age 17).
What is the current study of juvenile justice?
The current study examined the receipt and funding of treatment services for mental and behavioral problems among a sample of youth under probation supervision. Over the last two decades, researchers and practitioners have started to examine mental and behavioral service needs of youth and gain a better understanding of the complexities of providing treatment services in the juvenile justice system. Given this context, the current study contributes to the larger body of research on juvenile justice and treatment services by (1) examining the actual receipt or use of treatment services by youth under probation supervision, rather than referrals for services, and (2) examining the source of funding for treatment services. In light of the significant findings presented in the previous section, there are a number of key findings: (1) Few youth overall receive treatment services while on probation, (2) there are racial disparities in the receipt of treatment services, and (3) a disconnect exists between receiving treatment services and the willingness or capability of external funding sources to fund these services. These findings deserve further elaboration in the broader context of research and implications for practice and policy.
How long was the MCJPD probation period?
The MCJPD and the Treatment Services Division were sources for data regarding youth receiving treatment services. The time frame for the data spanned a 25-month period beginning July 1, 2012, to August 31, 2014, during which a total of 4,244 youth were placed on probation, 60 of whom had multiple probations during the time frame. 1 The data were compiled onsite with the assistance from the Research and Planning Division of the MCJPD. A data sharing agreement was obtained with institutional review board approval to receive deidentified youth information through electronic databases. With the exception of certain files, such as psychological case notes, 2 MCJPD uses the integrated court information system to manage youths’ records, and Microsoft ® Access was used to query databases associated with youth who were placed under probation supervision during the specified time frame. 3
What is MCJPD in Maricopa County?
Building on previous research on service needs and use among youth with mental and behavioral problems, this research examined treatment services received by youth involved in the Maricopa County Juvenile Probation Department (MCJPD). The court serves youth by requiring treatment services for mental and behavioral problems but providing resources to pay for treatment services adds an additional level of intervention and investment in these youth’s lives. The current research examined characteristics of youth who received treatment services as well as funding sources for services. More specifically, two research questions are examined:
Where is Clair White?
She is a research assistant professor at the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy at George Mason University. Her research interests include mental health and the criminal justice system, service use, crime and place, and the illicit use of prescription drugs.