Colin McGinn uses two analogies to give a moral explanation of the human treatment of other animals termed ‘speciesism’ (Weston 254). In his first analogy, McGinn tells of a particular vampire species that rely on human blood and orange juice for their diet. Get your
Full Answer
What is Colin McGinn known for?
Colin McGinn (born 10 March 1950) is a British philosopher. He has held teaching posts and professorships at University College London, the University of Oxford, Rutgers University and the University of Miami. McGinn is best known for his work in the philosophy of mind, and in particular for what is known as new mysterianism,...
What is the philosophy of John McGinn known for?
Philosophy of mind. McGinn has written extensively on philosophical logic, metaphysics, and the philosophy of language but is best known for his work in the philosophy of mind. He is known in particular for the development of the idea that human minds are incapable of solving the problem of consciousness, a position known as new mysterianism.
What is the argument of Animal Liberation?
Singer completes the argument of Animal Liberation with a telling chapter on the history of animal abuse and the gradual recognition that the law should prohibit at least some of the grosser forms of human cruelty. He deals also with all the counter-arguments to his position that he has heard, however fatuous these may be.
Why is the law of power so ingrained in animal rights?
The special feature of animal exploitation, which makes the law of power so ingrained in their case, is that the countervailing force of empathy is so much weaker here than elsewhere.
See more
Who is Colin McGinn?
Colin McGinn is an Anglo-American Analytic (AAA) philosopher who presented the standard argument against free will in its classic form in his 1993 book Problems in Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry .
What is an illusion question?
An illusion is (or arises from) some kind of pseudo-question, or a question that is so formulated as to suggest an answer of a kind that does not objectively exist. An illusory question is not to be confused with a mysterious one, which latter reflects ill on B, not on the question.
What are the parts of an inanimate object?
But it is also true of biological organisms, in which now the parts include kidneys, hearts, lungs, and the cells that compose these.
What is the transcendental component of TN?
The 'transcendent' component of TN simply gives expression to this naturalism about the mind.
What is a mystery in psychology?
A mystery is a question that does not differ from a problem in point of the naturalness of its subject-matter, but only in respect of the contingent cognitive capacities that B possesses: the mystery is a mystery for that being.
Is the will free from the fact that all actions are physically necessitated?
In particular, we cannot infer that the will is not free from the fact that all actions are physically necessitated: the ordinary notion does not deny this, and physical processes provide no explanatory model of the kind of thing the will is.
Is it reasonable to expect naturally based limits to human understanding?
It is a general property of evolved organisms, such as ourselves, to exhibit areas of cognitive weakness or incapacity, resulting from our biological constitution; so it is entirely reasonable to expect naturally based limits to human understanding. We are not gods, cognitively speaking.
