Treatment FAQ

what ancient society was similar to romes treatment of war surviviors

by Mr. Brandt Metz Published 2 years ago Updated 2 years ago
image

How did the ancient Romans treat their prisoners?

The ancient Romans were known for their brutality on the battlefield, and their treatment of prisoners was no different. Fortunately, for the majority of those imprisoned, confinement was often brief because even the Romans thought life imprisonment was inhumane.

How did the Roman Empire use violence to exercise their authority?

Imperial rulers were also known to employ violence as a way of exerting their authority over those who would defy them, sometimes to an extreme. Perhaps the most famous example is the massacre at Thessalonica in 390, when the citizens revolted and killed the general, Buthericus, for refusing to release a charioteer he was holding prisoner.

What are the two social classes in ancient Rome?

Society was divided in two classes – the upper-class Patricians and the working-class Plebeians – whose social standing and rights under the law were initially rigidly defined in favor of the upper class until the period characterized by the Conflict of the Orders (c. 500-287 BCE), a power struggle between the Plebeians and the Patricians.

What was life like in the Roman Empire in late antiquity?

There was major upheaval in the lives of regular Roman citizens in Late Antiquity, driven by the forces of the Christianization of the Empire and secular upheaval created by turmoil within Roman political structures.

image

What was war like in ancient Rome?

The Roman Army developed fighting techniques that were linked to a ferocious training regime. All new recruits to the army became very fit and disciplined. Training was harsh, as were punishments for failure. In a battle, new recruits were always placed at the front of the more experienced soldiers in the army.

What did they call PTSD in ancient times?

But PTSD—known to previous generations as shell shock, soldier's heart, combat fatigue or war neurosis—has roots stretching back centuries and was widely known during ancient times.

What was the classic division of medical treatment in ancient Rome?

Ancient Roman medicine was divided into specializations such as ophthalmology and urology. To increase their knowledge of the human body, physicians used a variety of surgical procedures for dissection that were carried out using many different instruments including forceps, scalpels and catheters.

Did PTSD exist in ancient times?

Ancient warriors could have suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as far back as 1300 BC, according to new research.

Does shell shock still exist?

The term shell shock is still used by the United States' Department of Veterans Affairs to describe certain parts of PTSD, but mostly it has entered into memory, and it is often identified as the signature injury of the War.

Did Romans have PTSD?

PTSD, or stress reactions from battle, were well known during the Greek and Roman era.

Who influenced Roman medicine?

the GreeksTheir medicine developed from the needs of the battlefield and learnings from the Greeks. Among the practices that the Romans adopted from the Greeks was the theory of the four humors, which remained popular in Europe until the 17th century.

How did Romans treat wounds?

Roman physicians treated flesh wounds by irrigation, antiseptics, herbal drugs, surgery, and the use of bandages and moisturizing dressings. The Roman army innovated the use of medical corpsmen and field hospitals to increase the speed of treatment.

In which ancient civilization was healthy living and exercise very important?

Perhaps no other civilization has held fitness in such high regard as ancient Greece. The idealism of physical perfection was one that embodied ancient Greek civilization. The appreciation for beauty of the body and importance of health and fitness throughout society is one that is unparalleled in history.

Is shell shock real?

The term "shell shock" was coined by the soldiers themselves. Symptoms included fatigue, tremor, confusion, nightmares and impaired sight and hearing. It was often diagnosed when a soldier was unable to function and no obvious cause could be identified.

What causes shell shock?

English physician Charles Myers, who wrote the first paper on “shell-shock” in 1915, theorized that these symptoms actually did stem from a physical injury. He posited that repetitive exposure to concussive blasts caused brain trauma that resulted in this strange grouping of symptoms.

How was shell shock treated?

In World War I this condition (then known as shell shock or 'neurasthenia') was such a problem that 'forward psychiatry' was begun by French doctors in 1915. Some British doctors tried general anaesthesia as a treatment (ether and chloroform), while others preferred application of electricity.

How does a society make war?

It is well known that the way in which a society makes war is a projection of that society itself. To give an example. The early 19th-century rise of Zulu desire for decisive battle, fought hand to hand, and resulting in the slaughter of enemy combatants and the incorporation of everyone else into the Zulu state was caused in large part by the rise of autocratic Zulu kingship, which sought to focus all political loyalty on the person of the king via the army.

When was the Hoplite Revolution?

Away of approaching the military aspect of the supposed ‘hoplite revolution’ in the Greek world ofthe late 8th and/or 7th centuries bc is to look at two ancient visual images of fighting. The first is a late Geometric, c. 735-720 bc, oinochoe (wine jug) from Athens (Figure 5).

The Dangers of Urban Life in Late Antiquity

There was major upheaval in the lives of regular Roman citizens in Late Antiquity, driven by the forces of the Christianization of the Empire and secular upheaval created by turmoil within Roman political structures.

The Barbarian in Literature

The dichotomy of “Romans versus barbarians” was a compete falsehood in Late Antiquity. In reality, by the latter half of the Western Empire, Romans had been using barbarian auxiliaries in their military for so long that the “Roman” army was composed mostly of barbarians or those of barbarian descent.

The Rules of Violence in Late Antiquity

The analogy between barbarianism and violence was deeply rooted in the Roman social consciousness, and as well as reinforcing Roman superiority it was also a convenient excuse for “un-Roman” behavior exhibited by their army during wartime.

The Rule of Law During Late Antiquity

The analogy between passion and barbarianism extended beyond warfare too, and the barbarian successor kingdoms were often depicted in Roman literature as being chaotic, violent places, where passions ruled.

What did slaves do to society?

Slaves were everywhere and enjoyed few rights but they made such societies function, not only producing goods and services but also allowing citizens the time to indulge in politics, philosophy, war and leisure activities.

Is World History Encyclopedia a non profit organization?

World History Encyclopedia is a non-profit organization. For only $5 per month you can become a member and support our mission to engage people with cultural heritage and to improve history education worldwide.

What was it like to be in prison in ancient Rome?

Here's What It Was Like For Prisoners In Ancient Rome. To most, prison is a living hell. But in many cases, the conditions were much worse in the distant past. The ancient Romans were known for their brutality on the battlefield, and their treatment of prisoners was no different.

What was the name of the city that the Romans were forced to live in during the Republic?

While during the Republic, wealthy Romans were only forced to stay away from certain places — most often the city of Rome and its surroundings — a newer, harsher form of exile later emerged. Deportatio forced citizens to live in a specific, undesirable location.

What were the powers of magistrates in Rome?

The Roman magistrates with the power to imprison citizens. Heritage Images/Getty Images. Minor magistrates called tresviri capitales served as an early type of police force in ancient Roman society. These officials had the authority to temporarily imprison citizens for disobeying their commands, or for public disorder.

What did Juvenal write about?

By the second century A.D., the increasing number of prisons in Rome led the satirist Juvenal to write about how he longed for the good old days when the city only needed one prison. But even though there were more prisons, the legal system simply could not keep up with the number of cases.

How deep is the underground prison in Rome?

Rome's most infamous prison is an underground dungeon about 12-feet down , and it may have been the origin of the phrase " to be cast into prison .".

Where were the prisons in Rome?

There were also prisons outside of Rome, including one at Alba Fucens in central Italy. The captured king of Macedonia, Perseus, nearly died from the terrible conditions here in the early second century B.C. According to author David J. Rothman, the historian Diodorus Siculus described the prison at Alba Fucens as an underground cell only the size of a dining room meant for nine people, but often having far more crammed in. Siculus says that the experience turned the prisoners into brutes "since their food and everything pertaining to their other needs was all so foully commingled, a stench so terrible assailed anyone who drew near it that it could scarcely be endured."

Why did Emperor Antoninus despised the idea of imprisonment?

Further, Emperor Antoninus must have despised the idea of imprisonment because he said, "your statement that a free man has been condemned to imprisonment in chains for life is incredible, for this penalty can scarcely be imposed [even] upon a person of servile condition.".

How did Rome's military success threaten its culture?

As Rome expanded its power on the Italian peninsula and beyond, its military success began to threaten its culture by weakening that personal interaction between citizens that had helped make it great.

Why did the Romans fight?

A Volunteer Army. Initially Romans fought not because they were mercenaries, but to defend “home and hearth, ” Calvert says. That gradually changed as the Roman Empire grew and needed increasing numbers of soldiers to maintain control.

What did Calvert say about the Romans?

Calvert says the Romans were a “very religious,” pious people who believed in honoring their ancestors and tradition. They also cherished courage, honesty, and duty, and their convictions, he says, were key to their rise as a culture. These virtues sound particularly like George Washington, whom contemporaries regularly compared to ancient Roman leaders, and today remains the American ideal of a leader.

What is Cronyism in Rome?

Cronyism, a.k.a. ‘Patronage’. Intrinsic to Roman society were “client-patron relationships,” in which a wealthy and powerful men did favors to less wealthy and powerful men in exchange for their loyalty, votes, and service. You can think of it as somewhat like the Italian mafia — or like the U.S. Congress.

How did the Plebians gain power?

As they gained wealth through trade, however, plebians demanded more political power. The rich fought back by taking public land for their own use and using their wealth and influence for themselves, more broadly, rather than accepting checks on their behavior for the common good.

What were the social classes in Athens and Rome?

The social classes of Greece and Rome changed over time, but the basic divisions of early Athens and Rome consisted of free and freedmen, enslaved people, foreigners, and women. Only some of these groups were counted as citizens.

What form of government did Rome have?

Then Rome, observing what was happening elsewhere in the world, eliminated them. It established a mixed Republican form of government, combining elements of democracy, oligarchy, and monarchy, In time, rule by one returned to Rome, but in a new, initially, constitutionally sanctioned form that we know as Roman emperors.

How were the ancient Greek cities separated from each other?

The ancient Greek city-states were separated from each other by hilly countryside and all were near the water. Rome was inland, on one side of the Tiber River, but the Italic tribes (in the boot-shaped peninsula that is now Italy) did not have the natural hilly borders to keep them out of Rome.

What was the economy of ancient Greece?

The economy of ancient cultures, including both Greece and Rome, was based on agriculture . Greeks ideally lived on small self-sufficient wheat-producing farms, but bad agricultural practices made many households incapable of feeding themselves. Big estates took over, producing wine and olive oil, which were also the chief exports of the Romans — not too surprisingly, given their shared geographical conditions and the popularity of these two necessities.

Why were women valued in Athens?

In Athens, according to the literature of stereotypes, women were valued for abstaining from gossip, for managing the household, and, most of all, for producing legitimate children. The aristocratic woman was secluded in the women's quarter and had to be accompanied in public places.

Is Greek art superior to Roman art?

Greek art is considered superior to the "merely" imitative or decorative Roman art; indeed much art we think of as Greek is actually a Roman copy of a Greek original . It is often pointed out that the goal of the classical Greek sculptors was to produce an ideal art form, whereas the goal of Roman artists was to produce realistic portraits, often for decoration. This is an obvious oversimplification.

Which ancient civilization waged many campaigns of conquest during its history?

Ancient Rome waged many campaigns of conquest during its history, but its most influential wars may have been the ones it fought against itself. Author: Evan Andrews. 1.

What was the first civil war in Rome?

Painting showing Marius in exile. (Credit: Dayton Museum of Art/Wikimedia Commons) Rome’s first civil war stemmed from a ruthless power struggle between the politician-generals Gaius Marius and Lucius Cornelius Sulla. The bad blood between the two men went back several years—Marius had once taken credit for one of Sulla’s military achievements—and ...

What was the name of the dynasty that lasted for nearly a century?

Augustus’ prosperous reign marked the beginning of the Julio-Claudian Dynasty, which lasted nearly a century. But with the suicide of the infamous Emperor Nero in A.D. 68, Rome was thrust into a tumultuous period of civil war that saw four different men take the throne in the span of just 18 months.

Where did Pompey go after the defeat?

Pompey fled to Egypt in the wake of the defeat, only to be double-crossed and executed by its young king. With Pompey dead, Caesar’s victory was all but secured. After defeating the last of Pompey’s allies in North Africa and Spain, he returned to Rome and was appointed dictator for life in early 44 B.C.

Who led the march on Rome?

Furious at having lost his chance at glory, Sulla marshaled his forces and led them in a march on Rome. It was a controversial move—no general had ever entered the city under arms—but Sulla soon swept aside Marius’ supporters and forced his rival to flee to Africa.

Who declared war on Cleopatra?

When Octavian persuaded the Senate to declare war on Cleopatra, the stage was set for a winner-takes-all fight for Rome. Following several months of maneuvering, Octavian and Antony and Cleopatra’s forces finally faced off at 31 B.C.’s naval battle at Actium.

Who was the first emperor to convert to Christianity?

When the dust finally cleared in 324, the Tetrarchy was dead and Constantine was the sole ruler of both the Western and Eastern Roman Empires. His reign marked a new chapter in Roman history—he was the first emperor to convert to Christianity—but the stability was only temporary.

image

Classes & Conflict

Image
The family was the nucleus of Roman society and formed the basis of every community. Stable families made for a stable society and were the most important component of a strict hierarchy based on gender, citizenship, ancestry, and census rank (where one lived and how much land one owned). A citizen was initially defin…
See more on worldhistory.org

Family

  • There is far more documentation on Patrician families than those of the lower class and yet the basic paradigm was the same for both. The father was the head of the family and made all the decisions regarding finance and the raising of children. Fathers had complete control over their children, no matter their age or marital status, from birth until his death(although a son could go …
See more on worldhistory.org

Women

  • Women were subject to the will of their fathers throughout their lives, even after they were married, and had no political voice or power. Daughters were taught how to keep and run a household, take care of their husbands and advance his career. In the late stages of the Roman Republic, women gained more rights but were still under the control of their fathers and husband…
See more on worldhistory.org

Marriage

  • There was no marriage ceremony as recognized in the modern day. Marriage was only legal between two consenting Roman citizens but “consent” was probably not always given freely. If a father had arranged a marriage for his son or daughter, unless he was incredibly lenient, the child was expected to go through with it even if they would prefer not to. Marriage ceremonies usuall…
See more on worldhistory.org

Home & Family

  • The minimum legal age for a girl to be married was 12 and, for a boy, 15 but most men married later, around the age of 26. This was because males were thought to be mentally unbalanced between the ages of 15-25. They were thought to be ruled entirely by their passions and unable to make sound judgements. Girls were thought to be far more mature at an earlier age (an accepte…
See more on worldhistory.org

Religion & The State

  • Religion informed each home, community, and the state. The state sponsored and encouraged homogeneous religious belief and ritual and religion empowered the state. All through the year there were festivals celebrating the gods, great deeds of the past linked with the gods, and the harvest provided by providence. The birthday of the head of the household honored the genius o…
See more on worldhistory.org

Virtues Key to Success

Image
Calvert says the Romans were a “very religious,” pious people who believed in honoring their ancestors and tradition. They also cherished courage, honesty, and duty, and their convictions, he says, were key to their rise as a culture. These virtues sound particularly like George Washington, whom contemporaries regularly comp…
See more on thefederalist.com

Foundation in Neighborhood-Level Self-Governance

  • Early Roman “government was local, personal, interactive,” Calvert says. The famed Alexis de Tocqueville found the same famously true of Americans, noting that whenever there was a local problem Americans got together and formed a club to take care of it. As Rome expanded its power on the Italian peninsula and beyond, its military success began to threaten its culture by …
See more on thefederalist.com

Cronyism, A.K.A. ‘Patronage’

  • Intrinsic to Roman society were “client-patron relationships,” in which a wealthy and powerful men did favors to less wealthy and powerful men in exchange for their loyalty, votes, and service. You can think of it as somewhat like the Italian mafia — or like the U.S. Congress. “We call that bribes and corruption but among Romans this was the way bu...
See more on thefederalist.com

A Volunteer Army

  • Initially Romans fought not because they were mercenaries, but to defend “home and hearth,” Calvert says. That gradually changed as the Roman Empire grew and needed increasing numbers of soldiers to maintain control. This eventually led to the military becoming a political player through a constituency that demanded more favors and began throwing support behind their ge…
See more on thefederalist.com

Trouble from Warfare Between Elites and Commoners

  • Initially, the Roman people overthrew kings to establish Senate, replacing hereditary tyrannical rule with rule of limited terms under law. The patricians (aristocracy) and plebians (common people) balanced power in ways that generally satisfied both. As they gained wealth through trade, however, plebians demanded more political power. The rich fought back by taking public land fo…
See more on thefederalist.com

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9