Why does Steinbock think withholding life-prolonging treatment is morally acceptable?
refuse life-preserving treatment even with inadequate reason. Why does Steinbock think that withholding life-prolonging treatment is morally acceptable when euthanasia is not? because the doctor is not intentionally terminating the patient's life.
What does Steinbock mean when he says a doctor may cease treatment?
T/F According to Steinbock, a doctor may cease treatment when treatment will create discomfort without improving the patient's condition. T/F Steinbock believes that a quick death is always preferable to a lingering one. What does Longino argue about the etymology of the word pornography? with what does longino link pornography?
When is the cessation of life-prolonging medical treatment justifiable?
Steinbock mentions two situations in which she considers the cessation of life-prolonging medical treatment justifiable. One of these is a. when a patient refuses treatment. b. when a baby has a deformity. c. when a patient is near death. d. when a patient wishes to end his or her life.
Which principle of beneficence most often conflicts with patient autonomy?
Of the other principles, a physician's intent for beneficence conflicts most often with patient autonomy. This conflict has led to the development of documentation in which the patient must demonstrate their understanding of the predictable consequences of his decision to act against medical advice.
Why does Steinbock think that withholding life prolonging treatment is morally acceptable?
Steinbock believes that in a few situations it is acceptable for a doctor to terminate a patient's life intentionally. A treatment that counts as ordinary care in one situation may count as extraordinary care in a different situation. Steinbock believes that a quick death is always preferable to a lingering one.
Why does Steinbock think that withholding life prolonging treatment is morally acceptable when euthanasia is not quizlet?
when a patient wishes to end his or her life. Why does Steinbock think that withholding life-prolonging treatment is morally acceptable when euthanasia is not? a. Because the doctor is being passive, not acting.
Which of the following best reflects Steinbock's interpretation of the American Medical Association's AMA statement on euthanasia?
Which of these best reflects Steinbocks interpretation of the American Medical Association's (AMA) statement on euthanasia? The AMA forbids all euthanasia but may allow doctors to stop using extraordinary means to prolong life.
What is the AMA's position on euthanasia quizlet?
c) The AMA forbids all euthanasia and also does NOT allow the cessation of extraordinary means to prolong life.
What does Steinbock say about the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means in the AMA doctrine?
The AMA statement allows the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means. to prolong life. Steinbock says it is a mistake to identify the cessation of extraordinary means. with passive euthanasia.
What is the difference between ordinary and extraordinary care?
Ordinary care is obligatory, but can become extraordinary care under certain situations. Extraordinary care is care whose provision involves a disproportionately great burden on the patient or community, and hence is not morally obligatory.
Is euthanasia refusing treatment?
The legal and moral right of competent patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment has been recognized on the basis of the belief that such a decision does not amount to assisted suicide or euthanasia (25).
What is passive and active euthanasia?
Active euthanasia: killing a patient by active means, for example, injecting a patient with a lethal dose of a drug. Sometimes called “aggressive” euthanasia. Passive euthanasia: intentionally letting a patient die by withholding artificial life support such as a ventilator or feeding tube.
What is the difference between ordinary and extraordinary care quizlet?
what is the difference between ordinary and extraordinary care? ordinary care is what doctors would usually be expected to provide; extraordinary care is not always appropriate and might be painful and unnecessary sometimes.
What does James Rachels think of the American Medical Association's position on euthanasia?
Rachels challenges the conventional view that passive euthanasia is permissible but active euthanasia is not. This view is endorsed by the American Medical Association in a 1973 statement. But Rachels holds that in some cases active euthanasia is morally preferable to passive euthanasia on utilitarian grounds.
What is Callahan's argument?
Callahan argues against this view on three grounds: that euthanasia and assisted suicide are evil, or more accurately, “morally mistaken”; that while physical pain and psychological suffering in the terminally ill are to be alleviated, assisted dying is not the way to do it; and that allowing physician-assisted suicide ...
What does active euthanasia involve According to Rachels?
Active euthanasia involves: the intentional termination of one's life by another person, to relieve pain and suffering.. According to the conventional doctrine: - .
Why is T/F Thomas in favor of affirmative action?
T/F Thomas is in favor of affirmative action in educational institutions because it ensures that minorities and women will have role models to look up to. T/F Thomas claims that sometimes it will be beneficial for a white student to have a white professor. T/F Thomas believes that knowledge is color-blind.
What does T/F Hursthouse believe?
T/F Hursthouse claims that every virtue generates a positive instruction, and every vice, a prohibition. T/F Hursthouse thinks that abortion is analogous to an appendectomy. T/F According to Hursthouse, virtue theories are committed to defining all of our moral concepts in terms of the virtuous agent.
Is Thomson's violinist case a persuasive defense of abortion?
T/F according to Warren, Thom son's violinist case provides a persuasive defenses of abortion only in cases where the mother is in no way morally responsible for her pregnancy. true. t/f Warren argues that a women's moral right to choose abortion depends on the extent of her responsibility for her pregnancy. false.
Is passive euthanasia morally permissible?
T/F According to the conventional doctrine, passive euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible. True. T/F Withholding treatment with the intention of ending the patient's life, to prevent the patient's further suffering, is an example of active euthanasia. False.