What is the right to refuse medical treatment?
A patient may refuse treatment that the healthcare provider deems to be an act of beneficence out of the principle of autonomy. In the United States, the right to refuse treatment is protected by 42 CFR § 482.13.
When is treatment over a patient’s objection appropriate?
KP: A simple example of when treatment over a patient’s objection would be appropriate is if a psychotic patient who had a life-threatening, easily treatable infection was refusing antibiotics for irrational reasons. Treatment would save the patient’s life without posing significant risk to the patient.
Is it unethical to force a patient into treatment against his will?
It is unethical to physically force or coerce a patient into treatment against his will if he is of sound mind and is mentally capable of making an informed decision.
Can you refuse treatment if you are mentally ill?
A mentally ill patient is another example of a patient that cannot refuse treatment if the person poses a physical threat to himself or others. Most patients in the United States have a right to refuse care if the treatment is being recommended for a non-life-threatening illness. You have probably made this choice without even realizing it.
Which of the following cases was significant in establishing the rights of the mentally ill?
The ruling in Durham v. United States (1954) established: that the insanity defense could be used for any crimes that were the product of a mental disease or mental defect.
Which of the following is true about the verdict guilty but mentally ill quizlet?
Which of the following is true about the verdict of "guilty but mentally ill"? It has been adopted by some states as an alternative to the verdict of "not guilty by reason of insanity."
What is the reason behind laws that allow for legal verdicts of guilty but mentally ill quizlet?
What is the rationale for laws that provide for legal verdicts of "guilty but mentally ill?" to provide treatment options for convicted criminals while still holding them responsible for their actions. Insanity Defense Reform Act.
Is insanity a legal term?
The term legal insanity also refers to the “mental state” of a person at the time of committing crime and nothing else. This is purely a legal concept and is unrelated to the various psychiatric diagnoses.
Which of the following is true about disputes over a patient's right to refuse treatment quizlet?
Which of the following is true about disputes over a patient's right to refuse treatment? had no intention of being treated.
Which of following statements most accurately describes psychopaths ability to learn from their past mistakes?
Which of following is the most accurate statement regarding psychopaths' ability to learn from their past mistakes? Psychopaths are generally cognitively impulsive and have a hypersensitivity to rewards.
Which of the following situations would fit the criteria of insanity established by the M Naghten rule?
The two elements of the M'Naghten insanity defense are the following: The defendant must be suffering from a mental defect or disease at the time of the crime. The defendant did not know the nature or quality of the criminal act he or she committed or that the act was wrong because of the mental defect or disease.
When someone is determined to be incompetent to stand trial What typically happens to the person?
What happens if a defendant is found to be incompetent? The judge temporarily suspends the trial with a finding of incompetency. Neither may the defendant plead guilty or not guilty or make a waiver of constitutional rights. Proceedings are suspended.
Which insanity standard has also been referred to as the product rule?
A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease.
In which of the following circumstances a person is entitled for the Defence of insanity?
To claim the defense of the Insanity , one should clearly show that at the time of the act the accused was suffering from the defect or mental illness. At the time of doing act he did not know the nature of the act. At the time of doing the act the accused do not know the that what he was doing was wrong.
When should insanity occur to be exempting?
An insane person under Paragraph 1, Article 1 of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines, the person is exempt from criminal liability if he or she acted during lucid interval. There should be clear and convincing evidence to prove the defendant's insanity. Art.
Which are definitions Some states employ of insanity as a legal concept quizlet?
A definition of insanity proposed by the American Law Institute (ALI), which states, "A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct, as a result of mental disease or defect, he lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality [wrongfulness] of his conduct or to conform ...