How do you measure acceptability of an intervention?
Factors such as participants' attitudes towards the intervention, appropriateness, suitability, convenience and perceived effectiveness of the intervention have been considered as indicators of treatment acceptability.Jan 26, 2017
What is treatment acceptability?
The construct of treatment acceptability, developed from the work of Wolf (1978) and Kazdin (1981), was defined as the degree to which stakeholders found the intervention to be fair, reasonable, appropriate, and consistent with expectations of treatment.
What test is used to assess the acceptability of interventions?
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) An update of the UTAUT, this is a 28-item measure of patient and consumer perceptions of intervention acceptability.
What is acceptability in healthcare?
Acceptability is one of the quality components in health care, apart from efficiency, optimality, legitimacy and equity. It is defined as conformity to the wishes, desires and expectations of patients and responsible members of their families.May 20, 2008
What is acceptability rate?
Price acceptability is a judgment of price based on a comparison of the price cue to a range of acceptable prices stored in memory.
What do you mean by acceptability?
Acceptability is the characteristic of a thing being subject to acceptance for some purpose. A thing is acceptable if it is sufficient to serve the purpose for which it is provided, even if it is far less usable for this purpose than the ideal example.
What is acceptability and feasibility?
The authors define acceptability as the factors that affect the participants' willingness to use the application and feasibility of the implementation factors such as structural context, administration and capabilities, as derived from similar prior research (28,30, 31) .
What type of research is acceptability?
Acceptability research is designed to obtain useful information for examining the extent to which an intervention meets the needs of the target population and organizational setting. How this is achieved can differ on many dimensions including the level of community involvement.Sep 1, 2013
What is acceptability in decision making?
Acceptability. 'Acceptability' (of a decision aid) refers to ratings regarding the comprehensibility of components of a decision aid, its length, pace (if audio-visual), amount of information, balance in presentation of information about options, and overall suitability for decision making.Sep 9, 2014
What is research applicability?
Applicability is defined as the extent to which the results observed in published studies are likely to reflect the expected outcomes when an intervention is applied to broader populations under real-world conditions. Similar terms include external validity, generalizability, directness, and relevance.
What is preventive and curative health care?
Preventive medicine is that branch of medical science that aims to improve and maintain health by ensuring people do not fall ill in the first place. On the contrary, curative medicine restores and maintains health by treating people after they fall ill.Nov 30, 2012
What is acceptability in healthcare?
Acceptability has become a key consideration in the design, evaluation and implementation of health care interventions. Many healthcare interventions are complex in nature; for example, they can consist of several interacting components, or may be delivered at different levels within a healthcare organisation [ 1 ]. Intervention developers are faced with the challenge of designing effective healthcare interventions to guarantee the best clinical outcomes achievable with the resources available [ 2, 3 ]. Acceptability is a necessary but not sufficient condition for effectiveness of an intervention. Successful implementation depends on the acceptability of the intervention to both intervention deliverers (e.g. patients, researchers or healthcare professionals) and recipients (e.g. patients or healthcare professionals) [ 4, 5 ]. From the patient’s perspective, the content, context and quality of care received may all have implications for acceptability. If an intervention is considered acceptable, patients are more likely to adhere to treatment recommendations and to benefit from improved clinical outcomes [ 6, 7 ]. From the perspective of healthcare professionals, if the delivery of a particular intervention to patients is considered to have low acceptability, the intervention may not be delivered as intended (by intervention designers), which may have an impact on the overall effectiveness of the intervention [ 8, 9 ].
What is an overview of reviews?
1) An overview of reviews was conducted to identify systematic reviews that claim to define, theorise or measure acceptability of healthcare interventions. 2) Principles of inductive and deductive reasoning were applied to theorise the concept of acceptability and develop a theoretical framework.
What is the inconsistency in defining concepts?
The inconsistency in defining concepts can impede the development of valid assessment instruments [ 20 ]. Theorising the concept of acceptability would provide the foundations needed to develop assessment tools of acceptability.
When should acceptability be considered?
It is increasingly acknowledged that ‘acceptability’ should be considered when designing, evaluating and implementing healthcare interventions. However, the published literature offers little guidance on how to define or assess acceptability. The purpose of this study was to develop a multi-construct theoretical framework of acceptability ...
Is acceptability research more robust?
Despite frequent claims that healthcare interventions have assessed acceptability, it is evident that acceptability research could be more robust. The proposed definition of acceptability and the TFA can inform assessment tools and evaluations of the acceptability of new or existing interventions.
What is the development phase of intervention?
The development phase of an intervention requires researchers to identify or develop a theory of change (e .g. what changes are expected and how they will be achieved) and to model processes and outcomes (e.g. using analogue studies and other evidence to identify the specific outcomes and appropriate measures) [ 1 ].