How do bacterial colonies differ from one another?
How do you differentiate colonies?
Why are these colonies different in Colour?
What was the population density of the original sample what would have happened if you had inoculated an agar plate with 1 mL of the original sample?
How do bacterial colonies differ from fungal molds colonies?
How do you identify a colony characteristics?
Why can bacterial colonies be different sizes and shapes?
What are colonies in microbiology?
Why do bacteria form colonies?
How did endospores affect the results from the heated and unheated soil slurries?
Which condition produced the most mold growth the fastest the least the slowest?
Why are the LB nutrient agar plates used in the experiment?
How are the colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia different?
To sum up, the colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia had their major difference in the sense of religion on one hand, and financial motivation on the other. Massachusetts was a charter colony, and therefore, able to determine their own governor. However, Virginia was much more under the influence of the queen, who took care of appointing a governor herself. These two english colonies are a good examples of how different people were thinking at that time. At one colony, religion is set by law and if you do not belief or behave in the same way you are punished to death. On the other side, Virginia handled the religion aspect much different. As an international student from Germany, I learned a lot about american and european history throughout this essay. It is interesting to see how America developed and what it became after its revolutionary war.
What were the social constraints of the Massachusetts Bay Colony?
There were many social constraints from appropriate dress to consumption of alcohol. All colonists were expected to carry a godly and holy demeanor and were held to high social standards3. Different occupations included fishermen, shipbuilding, hunting, lumberjack, and special skills and trades like blacksmith or seamstress. The social structure of the colony included the upper class, which consisted of the clergy, professors, and men of distinguished professions; the middle class, which had most of the colonists, especially traders, shopkeepers, and farmers; and the lower class who fell to some type of enslavement5.
How did the colonists establish a government?
Each of the original 13 colonies had a charter, or a written agreement between the colony and the English Parliament5. This meant that even though the Puritans left England, England still had some control over them. Only males who owned property were allowed to vote but governors were chosen by the king. England controlled trade and taxation but soon faced problems with colonists smuggling and trading goods behind its mother country’s back5.
What was the charter of the 13 colonies?
Each of the original 13 colonies had a charter, or a written agreement between the colony and the English Parliament5. This meant that even though the Puritans left England, England still had some control over them. Only males who owned property were allowed to vote but governors were chosen by the king.
Who founded the Virginia colony?
The colonial period in Virginia had its origin at Jamestown in 1607, and was founded by the Virginia Company of London. The Virginia Company of London was a group of investors who hoped to profit from the new environment. In 1609, a second royal charter arrived in order to provide ultimate political control from the crown. Virginias first two governors were Thomas West and Baron De La Warr, who achieved a strict set of rules. As a royal colony, Virginias politics operated as a "semi-military dictatorship“ in the fact that governors were elected by the crown.
What were the experiences of women during the colonial era?
The experiences of women during the colonial era varied greatly from colony to colony and among different ethnic groups. In New England, for example, the Puritan settlers brought their strong religious values with them to the New World, which dictated that a woman be subordinate to her husband and dedicate herself to rearing “God-fearing” children to the best of her ability. Among Puritan settlers in New England, wives almost never worked in the fields with their husbands. In German communities in Pennsylvania, however, many women worked in fields and stables. German and Dutch immigrants granted women more control over property, which was not permitted in the local English law. Unlike English colonial wives, German and Dutch wives owned their own clothes and other items and were also given the ability to write wills disposing of the property brought into the marriage.
What was the role of women in colonial America?
The Role of Women in the Colonies. Women played an integral role in the development of colonial America, despite having few legal rights.
How many people were killed in the Salem Witch Trials?
The trials resulted in the executions of 20 people, 14 of them women and all but one by hanging. Five others (including two infant children) died in prison.
When were the Salem Witch Trials?
The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts between 1692 and 1693.
Why were women more susceptible to suspicions of witchcraft?
Women were more susceptible to suspicions of witchcraft because they were perceived, in Puritan society, to have weaker constitutions that were more likely to be inhabited by the Devil.
What did the Puritans believe?
Like many other Europeans, the Puritans of New England believed in the supernatural. Every event in the colonies appeared to be a sign of God’s mercy or judgment, and it was commonly believed that witches allied themselves with the Devil to carry out evil deeds or cause deliberate harm.
Who weakened the idea that husbands were natural rulers over their wives?
Much later during the colonial experience, as the values of the American Enlightenment were imported from Britain, the philosophies of such thinkers as John Locke weakened the view that husbands were natural “rulers” over their wives and replaced them with a (slightly) more liberal conception of marriage.
