
Where in the Constitution does it say we can overthrow the government?
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, layi “Where in the Constitution does it say we can overthrow the government?” It is in the Declaration.
What if the slave-holding states had never consented to the Constitution?
The slave-holding states would have never consented to a new Constitution that struck a blow at their peculiar institution. The Constitution did, however, empower Congress to prevent its spread and set it on a course of extinction, while leaving the states free to abolish it within their own territory at any time.
What did the constitution say about equal treatment for slaves?
With the triumph of the Radical Republicans in Congress, the Constitution was amended to grant full citizenship to former slaves and promise them equal treatment under the law, a promise that took more than a century to fulfill. Michelle Alexander: How Equal Are We?
Are reparations for the Civil War constitutional?
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California at Berkeley School of Law, suggests that reparations could be constitutional if framed as an award to descendants of slaves — not African Americans. (Problem: What about descendants of pre-Civil War free people of color, or immigrants from Africa and the West Indies?)

What does Article 1 Section 51 of the Constitution say?
Legislative Branch All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
What does Article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution say?
Section 4 Government The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
What does Article 1 Section 7 Clause 3 of the Constitution mean?
Clause 3: Each law passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate must be signed by the President — or the President must agree with it — and the ones the President does not agree with (those that get “vetoed”) must be passed by two-thirds of the House of Representatives and the Senate before it can be the law.
What does Article 1 Section 10 Clause 3 of the Constitution mean?
Section 10, Clause 3 contains qualified prohibitions on a variety of activities. The prohibition on states charging duties of tonnage prevents state-specific protectionism and protects Congress's commerce power.
What does Article 5 of the Constitution say?
Article V says that “on the Application of two thirds of the Legislatures of the several States, [Congress] shall call a Convention for proposing amendments.” The convention can propose amendments, whether Congress approves of them or not. Those proposed amendments would then be sent to the states for ratification.
What is Article 7 all about?
The text of Article VII declares that the Constitution shall become the official law of the ratifying states when nine states ratified the document. When New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify on June 21, 1788, the Constitution became good law.
What does Article 1 Section 9 Clause 5 of the Constitution mean?
No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.
What does Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution say?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; Taxing Power.
What does Article 2 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution say?
Article II, Section 3 both grants and constrains presidential power. This Section invests the President with the discretion to convene Congress on “extraordinary occasions,” a power that has been used to call the chambers to consider nominations, war, and emergency legislation.
What is Article 11 of the Constitution?
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests. 2.
What does the Article 1 Section 7 of the Constitution explain?
The Clause provides that a bill can become a law only if, after passage by both Houses of Congress, it is presented to the President. The President then has ten days either to sign the bill into law or reject the bill and return it to Congress with an explanation of his or her objections.
What does Article 2 Section 1 of the Constitution mean?
Article II, Section 1 establishes that the president and vice president are to be elected at the same time and serve the same four-year term. Until 1951, presidents could serve for as many four-year terms as they could win.
Why does the Constitution not recognize slavery?
Because the Constitution does not explicitly recognize slavery and does not therefore admit that slaves were property, all the protections it affords to persons could be applied to slaves.
Who said the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit?
Sandford (1857) that the Founders’ Constitution regarded blacks as “so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.”.
What clauses could have been added to the Constitution to enshrine slavery?
One can readily imagine any number of clauses that could have been added to our Constitution to enshrine slavery. The manumission of slaves could have been prohibited . A national right to bring one’s slaves to any state could have been recognized. Congress could have been barred from interfering in any way with the transatlantic slave trade.
What did the early Congresses do to regulate the transatlantic slave trade?
Early Congresses did, however, regulate the transatlantic slave trade, pursuant to their power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations ” ( Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 ). In 1794, 1800, and 1803, statutes were passed that severely restricted American participation in it. No American shipyard could be used to build ships that would engage in the slave trade, nor could any ship sailing from an American port traffic in slaves abroad. Americans were also prohibited from investing in the slave trade.
Why were circumlocutions important?
Although these circumlocutions may not have done much to improve the lot of slaves, they are important, as they denied constitutional legitimacy to the institution of slavery. The practice remained legal, but slaveholders could not invoke the supreme law of the land to defend its legitimacy.
What is the 3/5 clause?
The infamous three-fifths clause, which more nonsense has been written than any other clause, does not declare that a black person is worth 60 percent of a white person. It says that for purposes of determining the number of representatives for each state in the House (and direct taxes), the government would count only three-fifths of the slaves, and not all of them, as the Southern states, who wanted to gain more seats, had insisted. The 60,000 or so free blacks in the North and the South were counted on par with whites.
Which amendment states that slavery is not involuntary?
With the passage of the 13th Amendment—which states that “ [n]either slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction”—the central contradiction at the heart of the Founding was resolved.
What is the 3/5ths clause in the Constitution?
Courtesy U.S. National Archives (1667751) Often misinterpreted to mean that African Americans as individuals are considered three-fifths of a person or that they are three-fifths of a citizen of the U.S., the three-fifths clause (Article I, Section 2, of the U.S.
Why did Gouverneur Morris argue that he could not support equal representation?
Other delegates including most notably Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania argued that he could not support equal representation because he “could never agree to give such encouragement to the slave trade…by allowing them [Southern states] a representation for their negroes.”.
How many representatives did slaveholding states have?
By 1793, slaveholding states had 47 congressmen but would have had only 33 if not for the compromise. During the entire period before the Civil War slaveholding states had disproportionate influence on the Presidency, the Speakership of the House of Representatives, and the U.S. Supreme Court because of the compromise. By the 1830s abolitionists such as William Lloyd Garrison of Massachusetts used the clause in their argument that the Federal government was dominated by slaveholders.
What was the 3/5ths clause?
The three-fifths clause was part of a series of compromises enacted by the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The most notable other clauses prohibited slavery in the Northwest Territories and ended U.S. participation in the international slave trade in 1807. These compromises reflected Virginia Constitutional Convention delegate (and future U.S.
Which amendment gave black people the right to vote?
The three-fifths clause remained in force until the post-Civil War 13th Amendment freed all enslaved people in the United States, the 14th amendment gave them full citizenship, and the 15th Amendment granted black men the right to vote.
Who used the compromise clause in their argument?
Supreme Court because of the compromise. By the 1830s abolitionists such as William Lloyd Garrison of Massachusetts used the clause in their argument ...
Who said blacks should stand on an equality with whites?
When Constitutional Convention delegate Roger Sherman of Connecticut proposed that congressional representation be based on the total number of inhabitants of a state, delegate Charles Pinckney of South Carolina agreed saying “blacks ought to stand on an equality with whites….” Pinckney’s statement was disingenuous since at the time he knew most blacks were enslaved in his state and none, slave or free, could vote or were considered equals of white South Carolinians. Other delegates including most notably Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania argued that he could not support equal representation because he “could never agree to give such encouragement to the slave trade…by allowing them [Southern states] a representation for their negroes.”
Who said "I am doubtful about the theological justification for corporate repentance"?
Bruce quotes PCA minister Todd Pruitt: “I am doubtful about the theological justification for corporate repentance—that sin is generational and therefore those who were not even born during the era of Jim Crow and segregation bear the taint of guilt.
What does Jesus say about repentance?
Jesus preached repentance often during his earthly ministry, saying things like ““Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near,” ( Matthew 4:17) and “If your brother or sister sins against you, rebuke them; and if they repent, forgive them” ( Luke 17:3 ).
What amendments were added to the Constitution?
Equality and The Fourteenth Amendment: A New Constitution. In the wake of the Civil War, three amendments were added to the U.S. Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery (1865), the Fourteenth Amendment made freed slaves citizens of the United States and the state wherein they lived ...
Which amendments were most important in the Civil War?
Of the Civil War Amendments, the Fourteenth Amendment had the most far-reaching effect on the meaning of the Constitution. It conferred both national and state citizenship upon birth, thereby protecting the legal status of the newly freed slaves.
What is the 14th amendment?
The Fourteenth Amendment represented a great expansion of the power of the national government over the states. It has been cited in more Supreme Court cases than any other part of the Constitution.
Which amendment introduced the idea of equality to the Constitution for the first time?
And finally, the Fourteenth Amendment introduced the ideal of equality to the Constitution for the first time, promising “equal protection of the laws.”.
Why is collective punishment rejected?
And the concept of “collective punishment” has been rejected by the modern civilized world as a violation of human rights.
What are the seven substances?
These are the seven substances — unmade, irreducible, uncreated, without a creator, barren, stable as a mountain-peak, standing firm like a pillar — that do not alter, do not change, do not interfere with one another, and are incapable of causing one another pleasure, pain, or both pleasure and pain.
Is it responsible to correct an injustice?
On the other hand, if there does exist a state of inequality, injustice, or unfair imbalance existing today, which is due to “injustices of the past,” then each and every one of us is “responsible” to do what we can, from the moment our awareness of an issue exists and on into the future, to do what we can to correct it, even if the existence of
Is blood guilt a violation of the Constitution?
No. Read the US Constitution. The concept of “blood guilt” - that citizens and residents are liable for the acts of their relatives is expressly prohibited in very plain, and unambiguous terms.
Is anyone born into the privilege a legitimate target of revolutionary masses?
This however, doesn’t come from legalistic considerations of responsibility across generation. The objective is purely pragmatic: to shrink the social base of resistance, and paralyze the political will of counter-revolutionaries. Therefore, anyone born into the privilege is a legitimate target of revolutionary masses.
Can you blame someone for their deeds?
However, there is no rational basis for blaming a person (or thanking him) for the blameworthy deeds of his ancestors , his countrymen, or indeed for anything that he had no part in or influence on. If one could do that, the it would be equally valid to blame any other person chosen at random, even oneself. Only the people who had participated in the decision or deed or acquiesced in it could validly accept blame.
Why is there no right to the violent overthrow of the American government?
Second, there is no right to the violent overthrow of the American Government because the Constitution has given a non-violent means. First there is the vote - just elect new leaders.
Who wrote about the right to overthrow the government?
Americans do not have the right to violently overthrow or revolt against our government as long as our Constitution endures. John Locke, Aquinas, John Stuart Mills, and others wrote about the right to violently oppose an oppressive government. But in America, WE are the government.
What is the Declaration of Independence?
The Declaration of Independence of the United States says: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
How can the Constitution change the essence of our government?
The only way the Constitution, the essence of our government can be changed is if three-fourths of the states agree to a constitutional amendment. Try to overthrow the government in any other way and you become a traitorous criminal. The constitution does not say you can overthrow the government.
What is the First Amendment?
You can see that in the first two articles in the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, religion and the press. It also guarantees the right of the people to petition the government for redress of grievances.
What does the Declaration of Independence say about the right to change the government?
Specifically, in the Declaration of Independence, it does say the People have the right and duty to CHANGE their form of government, if the original government becomes tyrannical or contradictory to their happiness. The Declaration of Independence. America's Founding Documents.
How often is the vote of no confidence scheduled?
In the UK, it can happen anytime the peoples' representatives call for a vote of no confidence. In the US, it's regularly scheduled every four years.
Why were set asides unconstitutional?
Under this standard, government contracting set-asides intended to support historically disadvantaged African American (or other minority) businesses , in preference to some white-owned ones, were unconstitutional, the court held, because, even in the former Confederate capital, Richmond, the location of a landmark 1989 case, it was too hard to prove that any given minority business suffered discrimination at the hands of the contracting agency.
What are the main questions asked by advocates about reparations?
Increasingly, advocates ask not “if” but “how.” Vox reports the main questions are “what a reparations program would look like, who would benefit, who would pay, and how it would be funded.”
What is the case for reparations?
In his seminal 2014 Atlantic article, “The Case for Reparations,” Ta-Nehisi Coates implied that the situation of African Americans today is essentially similar to that of the newly emancipated in 1865, or the World War II internees, in that they still suffer, not just from slavery, but from much more recent policies such as mid-20th-century federally backed housing discrimination.
Which law was passed in 1968 to reduce societal accountability?
Yet today’s conservative-majority court would almost certainly note that subsequent legal reforms such as the 1968 Fair Housing Act or the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act mitigate societal or governmental accountability, and weaken the link between past policy and current hardship.
Who testified on slavery reparations?
Writer Ta-Nehisi Coates testifies on slavery reparations at a June hearing of a House Judiciary subcommittee. (Zach Gibson/Getty Images)
Who said that a person can be disadvantaged by the government because of their race?
But Justice Sandra Day O’Connor had the last word, noting in 1995 that “any individual suffers an injury when he or she is disadvantaged by the government because of his or her race, whatever that race may be.”
Can race conscious policies be enacted?
The court’s answer: not much. Under the 14th Amendment, a race-conscious policy, state or federal, could be enacted only if it passed “strict scrutiny” — that is, if it was “narrowly tailored” to meet a “compelling” government interest, through the “least restrictive” means available.
Does Onyx Truth reflect the views of the website owner?
All views expressed by contributors of the Onyx Truth website do not necessarily reflect the views of the Onyx Truth website owner.
Is B-B-but, I'm not racist?
5. Are you a “b-b-but, I’m not racist” type of person? YES
Can you copy the Onyx Truth?
Do not copy our work unless you directly link to the article. With that said, you can only copy one paragraph of any of the works on the Onyx Truth to place on another site, but you still MUST link to the article on the Onyx Truth.
Do black people say if we had a white awards show, they would say it’s racist?
18. Are you a “If we had a white awards show, blacks would say it’s racist” type of person? YES
Are white people responsible for the sins of their ancestors?
Here are some questions to help you figure out if you, white person, are responsible for the sins of your ancestors:
