Throughout Thomson’s argument it’s explained to be an unjust killing to unplug the violinist, and as a result an abortion violates the right to life too. Therefore abortion is considered to be an unjust killing. On the other hand, possibly by continuing the pregnancy it is likely to shorten the mother’s life.
Full Answer
What is Judith Jarvis Thomson’s defense of abortion?
The refusal to share is indecent and unjust. Thomson states “to deprive someone of what he has a right to is to treat him unjustly. ” The brothers and the chocolate show this, but on the contrary if in the violinist scenario, you learn that instead of 9 months, you are to spend 9 years plugged into him, you aren’t being unjust because you gave him no right to your kidneys; you were kidnapped.
What is JJ Thomson's position on abortion?
“A Defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson is an excellent essay because the author portrays the many controversies surrounding abortion. ... is how the author gets her point across to show just how unjust this treatment is to any individual having an unfortunate event like this becoming a moral responsibility. ... according to ...
How would you respond to the criticism on Thomson’s behalf?
Points 1-3. The first point of interest focuses on ''the extreme view'' that the fetus' right to life outweighs the mother's right to life in the event that the mother is expected to die if she ...
How does Thomson defend the case for the right to life?
Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion. According to Thomson, what is the relationship between the right to life and the right to decide what happens to one's body? a. The right to life is always more important. b. The right to decide what happens to one's body is always more important. c. The two rights never conflict.
Why is Valarie Tarico for abortion?
She says that it is one of the biggest decisions in life to bring a child into the world. She then goes on and explains ten reasons why she is for abortion. Her reasons for abortion are; limiting the amount of time a woman has a child is “female empowerment and equality”, pregnancies are better when they are spaced out, parenting is a hard job , having a child that was expected is better for couples , the process of reproduction is not perfect , morality is about the health of those who can feel, birth control can be ineffective, she believes in fresh starts, people have the responsibility
What does Michael Tooley believe about abortion?
He debates that abortion during any stage of pregnancy should be accepted with his reason being that a fetus does not have “a serious right to life”. In his work "Abortion and Infanticide", he discuss "what characteristics [a fetus] must have in order to be considered a person." He believes that a person’s identity is progressively attained, and the fetus is not a person until birth.
Background
Do you consider yourself pro-choice or pro-life? On both extremes, people have strong opinions about when life begins and whether or not a woman's right to make decisions about her body extend to the overruling the right of life for a fetus.
Points 1-3
The first point of interest focuses on ''the extreme view'' that the fetus' right to life outweighs the mother's right to life in the event that the mother is expected to die if she carries the child to term. From the opposition's point of view, there is a difference between actively killing the fetus and passively allowing the mother to die.
Points 4-6
The fourth point questions whether the right to life is affected by whether or not the mother is a willing participant in the process that led to the pregnancy. Rape is compared to forcing a person to allow a burglar to live in your home because you opened the window that the burglar used to enter.
Why is there no response to the criticism on Thomson’s behalf?
In response to the criticism on Thomson’s behalf there would be no response, because the circumstances are not equal. None of the scenarios or examples is equivalent to an abortion. Thomson’s examples make sense, but they do not equal with reality. In the end, a person’s autonomy wins over the right to life.
Why is Thomson's argument wrong?
As a result, Thomson’s argument is wrong for the reason that the circumstances are not equal and a person’s autonomy wins in the right to life. In response to the criticism on Thomson’s behalf there would be no response, because the circumstances are not equal. None of the scenarios or examples is equivalent to an abortion.
Does Thomson reflect on the person who has the greater right to life?
However, Thomson does not solely reflect on the person who has the greater right to life. In the case of violinist, Thomson does not refer to the fact that dying is a part of life’s cycle. Death is anticipated and a natural part of life. Obviously in this case the violinist has lived, but the fetus has not lived outside of the womb.
Is abortion an unjust killing?
Throughout Thomson’s argument it’s explained to be an unjust killing to unplug the violinist, and as a result an abortion violates the right to life too. Therefore abortion is considered to be an unjust killing. On the other hand, possibly by continuing the pregnancy it is likely to shorten the mother’s life.
Does Thomson say that dying is a part of life?
In the case of violinist, Thomson does not refer to the fact that dying is a part of life’s cycle. Death is anticipated and a natural part of life. Obviously in this case the violinist has lived, but the fetus has not lived outside of the womb.