Sepulveda rationalized Spanish treatment of American Indians by arguing that Indians were “natural slaves” and that Spanish presence in the New World would benefit them. Citing the Bible and canon law, Las Casas responded, “All the World is Human!”
How did Sepulveda rationalize Spanish treatment of American Indians?
He claimed that the Indians had no ruler, and no laws, so any civilized man could legitimately appropriate them. In other words, Sepúlveda considered the Indians to be pre-social men with no rights or property.
How did Sepulveda argue against Las Casas?
Dec 11, 2015 · It is the purpose of this paper to examine Sepúlveda's ideas on the nature of the American natives, particularly the question of whether the Indians are natural slaves. Considerations of space, of course, rule out the possibility of undertaking here a detailed scrutiny of the foundations upon which those ideas rest.
How did Sepúlveda defend the position of the colonists?
Mar 17, 2020 · Bartolomé de Las Casas debates the subjugation of the Indians, 1550. Sepulveda argued against Las Casas on behalf of the colonists' property rights. Sepulveda rationalized Spanish treatment of American Indians by arguing that Indians were “natural slaves” and that Spanish presence in the New World would benefit them. Click to see full answer.
How did Bartolome de las Casas justify the subjugation of the Indians?
Sepulveda argued against Las Casas on behalf of the colonists’ property rights. Sepulveda rationalized Spanish treatment of American Indians by arguing that Indians were “natural slaves” and that Spanish presence in the New World would benefit them. Citing the Bible and canon law, Las Casas responded, “All the World is Human!”
What did Juan Gines de Sepulveda argue?
He claimed that the Indians had no ruler, and no laws, so any civilized man could legitimately appropriate them. In other words, Sepúlveda considered the Indians to be pre-social men with no rights or property.
What did Bartolome de las Casas argue?
While the Pope had granted Spain sovereignty over the New World, de Las Casas argued that the property rights and rights to their own labor still belonged to the native peoples. Natives were subjects of the Spanish crown, and to treat them as less than human violated the laws of God, nature, and Spain.
What did Bartolome de las Casas believe about Native Americans?
Las Casas, perhaps to clear his conscience, described the atrocities committed by the Spanish and fought to defend the Natives' rights. He claimed they were a peaceful and innocent people in need of peaceful conversion to Catholicism.
What did Bartolome de las Casas speak out against?
Bartolomé de Las Casas was a Dominican priest who was one of the first Spanish settlers in the New World. After participating in the conquest of Cuba, Las Casas freed his own slaves and spoke out against Spanish cruelties and injustices in the empire.
Why did Bartolome de las Casas write his brief description of the destruction of the Indies?
A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies One of the stated purposes for writing the account was Las Casas's fear of Spain coming under divine punishment and his concern for the souls of the native peoples.
How does de las Casas portray the natives is his portrayal problematic how does his portrayal help support his argument?
How does his portrayal help support his argument? He portrays the Natives as helpless, innocent people. It is problematic, because the Natives could not see how violent the Spanish were until it was too late and when they tried to fight back they used weapons that were insignificant to the Spanish weaponry.
Why did Bartolomé de las Casas help the natives?
Las Casas sought to change the methods of the Spanish conquest, and believed that both the Spaniards and indigenous communities could build a new civilization in America together. For this reason, during his stay in Spain he conceived the Plan para la reformación de las Indias (Plan for the Reformation of the Indies).
What is De Las Casas trying to accomplish?
Bartolomé de Las Casas, a Spanish Dominican priest, wrote directly to the King of Spain hoping for new laws to prevent the brutal exploitation of Native Americans.
How did the Spanish treat the natives?
There actually are simple Spain treated the Indigenous peoples of the Americas with extreme violence, death, torture, mutilation, rape, and enslavement. The Spaniards used their superior weapons, guns,cannons, swords,cross bows, to crush any and all resistance by the Indigenous people.
How did the British treat the natives?
They respected Native territories, their ways, and treated them as the human beings they were. The English treated the Natives as inferior, believed they stood in the way of their God-given right to the land in America and tried to subject the Natives to their laws as they established their colonies.
How did Bartolome de las Casas help the natives?
Bartolomé de Las Casas (c. His brave stand against the horrors of the conquest and the colonization of the New World earned him the title “Defender of the Native Americans." Las Casas' efforts led to legal reforms and early debates about the idea of human rights.
What is the black legend in history?
The Black Legend is a style of propaganda that criticizes the Spanish Empire, first described by Julian Juderias in his book, The Black Legend and Historical Truth. The legend infers that no good came of the period of exploration except for the gains of the Spanish.
What is Sepulveda's point of view towards natives?
What is Sepulveda's Point of View towards Natives? He views the Spanish as superior and must spread their knowledge and beliefs. 2. How does this contrast with Bartolomé de Las Casas? He believed that the treatment towards natives was wrong and unjust Next page for one more document!
What were the new laws of 1542?
The “New Laws” of 1542 were a series of laws and regulations approved by the King of Spain in November of 1542 to regulate the Spaniards who were enslaving the natives in the Americas, particularly in Peru. The laws were extremely unpopular in the New World and directly led to a civil war in Peru.
Why does Las Casas after describing the ill treatment?
Why does Las Casas, after describing the ill treatment of Indians, write, “And this was the freedom, the good treatment and the Christianity the Indians received”? That is why he wrote “And this was the freedom, the good treatment and the Christianity the Indians received”.