Treatment FAQ

what has the united states done to make up for the mis treatment of the american indian?

by Cristal Lemke Published 3 years ago Updated 2 years ago

What did the United States do to help the Indian tribes?

In many treaties, the federal government agreed to guarantee education, health care, housing, and other services to Indian tribes. The United States also agreed to manage and protect Indian tribes’ resources, such as lands and timber.

How has the federal government treated Native Americans?

The federal government’s treatment towards native reservations is similar to that of an absentee parent: neglecting to attend to their needs yet refusing to give them the freedom and ability to grow on their own. Throughout history, natives have been given three dismal choices: assimilation, relocation, or genocide.

How are Native Americans treated by Caucasians?

Even today, the treatment of Native Americans by Caucasians is abysmal. Reservations, as an effect of many laws enacted by the U.S. government, have been relegated to poverty. According to the Atlantic, Native Americans have a rate of poverty of almost twice the national average, the highest of all racial groups in America.

What was the result of the Indian Removal Bill?

One of the most bitterly debated issues on the floor of Congress was the Indian Removal Bill of 1830, pushed hard by then-President Andrew Jackson. Despite being assailed by many legislators as immoral, the bill finally passed in the Senate by nine votes, 29 to 17, and by an even smaller margin in the House.

How did the United States treat Native Americans?

After its formation, the United States, as part of its policy of settler colonialism, continued to wage war and perpetrated massacres against many Native American peoples, removed them from their ancestral lands, and subjected them to one-sided treaties and to discriminatory government policies, later focused on forced ...

What was the US solution to the Indian problem?

U.S. leaders' solution to the “Indian Problem” included removing Natives to Indian Territory where each tribe could be a sovereign nation away from non-Indians. These policies created lasting challenges across Indian Country and led to the Tribe's forced removal from the Great Lakes region to present-day Kansas.

What did the U.S. government do to weaken the Native American population?

The Dawes Act (sometimes called the Dawes Severalty Act or General Allotment Act), passed in 1887 under President Grover Cleveland, allowed the federal government to break up tribal lands.

What current issues do Native Americans face?

Challenges that Native people face are experienced socially, economically, culturally, and on many other fronts, and include but aren't limited to:Impoverishment and Unemployment.COVID-19 Pandemic After Effects.Violence against Women and Children.The Climate Crisis.Less Educational Opportunities.More items...•

How did the United States deal with the Indian problem of the 19th century?

Object Details. As American power and population grew in the 19th century, the United States gradually rejected the main principle of treaty-making—that tribes were self-governing nations—and initiated policies that undermined tribal sovereignty.

How did the American government address the Indian problem?

In the 1950s, the United States came up with a plan to solve what it called the "Indian Problem." It would assimilate Native Americans by moving them to cities and eliminating reservations. The 20-year campaign failed to erase Native Americans, but its effects on Indian Country are still felt today.

In what ways are Native Americans still struggling in spite of civil rights reforms?

In what ways are Native Americans still struggling in spite of civil rights reforms? Native American groups is lack of federal recognition. This recognition entitles the groups to receive funding and special protections from the government.

What was the US government's policy in dealing with the American Indian tribes?

For most of the middle part of the 19th century, the U.S. government pursued a policy known as “allotment and assimilation.” Pursuant to treaties that were often forced upon tribes, common reservation land was allotted to individual families.

How many Native American treaties were broken?

From 1778 to 1871, the United States government entered into more than 500 treaties with the Native American tribes; all of these treaties have since been violated in some way or outright broken by the US government, Native Americans and First Nations peoples are still fighting for their treaty rights in federal courts ...

What is the biggest problem for Native Americans?

Lack of resources are leading to poverty and unemployment. Unemployment is also skyrocketing within Indigenous populations; in 2019, the Bureau of Labor Statistics found that American Indian and Alaska Native people faced an average unemployment rate of 6.6%, compared to the national average of 3.9%.

Do Native Americans pay taxes?

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all individuals, including Native Americans, are subject to federal income tax. Section 1 imposes a tax on all taxable income. Section 61 provides that gross income includes all income from whatever source derived.

Why was there an Indian Removal Act?

Working on behalf of white settlers who wanted to grow cotton on the Indians' land, the federal government forced them to leave their homelands and walk hundreds of miles to a specially designated “Indian territory” across the Mississippi River.

What are the three choices that Native Americans have been given?

Throughout history, natives have been given three dismal choices: assimilation, relocation, or genocide. The harsh reality of America’s history is the fact that the treatment of Native Americans is now and always has been grotesque.

What was the first step in confining Indian tribes to small, impoverished reservations?

The events that followed contributed to the bleak future of the natives. In 1851, Congress passed the Indian Appropriation Act , the first step in officially confining tribes to small, impoverished reservations. Forced assimilation permitted by the Dawes Act did not bode well for the tribes, either.

What happened to the Pequot Indians?

Celebrating the beginning of their yearly corn harvest with their four-day long Green Corn Ceremony, the Pequot Indians were unsuspecting victims of a massacre. Early in the morning, members of the Massachusetts Bay Colony arrived and brutally murdered 700 unarmed tribal members, as stated by Huffington Post.

Which department is responsible for the most serious crimes on reservations?

The Justice Department, which is responsible for attending to the most serious crimes on reservations, only files charges in about half of the murder investigations, according to the New York Times. In addition, they turn down nearly two-thirds of sexual assault cases, enabling a high rate of crime to continue.

Did Native Americans celebrate Thanksgiving?

Since colonialism, Native Americans have received the worst treatment history has to offer. While a feast between the colonists and the Indians did occur once in 1621, the diverse and grateful tradition did not truly start the national Thanksgiving holiday, according to The Day, a Connecticut based newspaper.

Did the Dawes Act force assimilation?

Forced assimilation permitted by the Dawes Act did not bode well for the tribes, either. Many tribes were a part of involuntary assimilation into white cultures: sorted into boarding schools that taught them to be the eurocentric definition of civilized.

What law did the Supreme Court rule that states cannot regulate Native American gaming enterprises?

This resulted in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, which provided the framework that governs Indian casinos. The Treaty of Ft. Laramie of 1868 "set apart for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation" ...

What were the targets of the Trail of Tears?

A primary target was the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole from Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida. Although the removal and resettlement was supposed to be voluntary, ultimately, this resulted in the series of forcible removals known as the Trail of Tears. Allotment and Assimilation.

Why was William McIntosh assassinated?

For example, William McIntosh, chief of the Muskogee-Creek Nation, was assassinated for signing the Treaty of Indian Springs in violation of Creek law. Treaty-making as a whole ended in 1871, when Congress ceased to recognize the tribes as entities capable of making treaties.

What was the trail of tears?

Although the removal and resettlement was supposed to be voluntary, ultimately, this resulted in the series of forcible removals known as the Trail of Tears. For most of the middle part of the nineteenth century, the U.S. government pursued a policy known as “allotment and assimilation.”.

What do indigenous Americans call for?

Indigenous Americans call for reform of federally-guaranteed health care. Health Insurance. American Indians and Alaska Natives are entitled to federally funded health care under treaties negotiated between tribal nations and the U.S. government. “Our treaties say that we have a right to health care provided by the federal government,” said Abigail ...

Does the government fund indigenous programs?

But according to a 2018 report from the independent and bipartisan Commission on Civil Rights, the U.S. government has not adequately funded these programs, leaving many indigenous communities without the ability to provide quality care.

Do Alaska Natives get federal health care?

Key Points. American Indians and Alaska Natives are entitled to federally funded health care under treaties negotiated between tribal nations and the U.S. government. But according to a 2018 report from the independent and bipartisan Commission on Civil Rights, the U.S. government has not adequately funded these programs, ...

Who fooled the US into entering into treaties?

Nobody fooled the US into entering into treaties, nobody tricked Benjamin Franklin (or whatever founding father) into building a nation that also had many other nations within it. This is the nation they built; these are the agreements they made. If we honor the Constitution, we have to honor the treaties.

When did the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act expire?

The Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act, which simplified the housing assistance process for Indian nations, expired in 2013. While small amounts continue to be funded, the act, as a step toward recognizing the homelessness crisis in Indian Country, needs to be reauthorized.

What does it mean to fulfill the Treaties?

First and foremost, fulfilling the treaties means recognizing that tribal nations are political entities and respecting the right to self-govern. To support that, the federal government needs to fully fund its obligations that were pre-paid by tribes with land.

What are the common features of the Treaties?

While the language in the treaties is diverse, there are often certain common features of the pacts: a guarantee of peace, a definition of land boundaries, preservation of hunting and fishing rights, and provisions for protection against domestic and foreign enemies.

What is the Indian Child Welfare Act?

Questions covered a lot of ground: climate change, the 2020 census, the consultation of Indigenous nations on federal decisions, and the Indian Child Welfare Act, a 1978 law meant to reverse the disproportionately high number of Indigenous children removed from their homes by government agencies.

Has the US signed any treaties with Indigenous peoples?

The US has signed hundreds of treaties with Indigenous peoples. Here’s what would happen if the government actually honored them. By Rory Taylor Sep 23, 2019, 8:30am EDT. Share this story.

Is Indian health service mandatory?

It is time for mandatory, full funding of the Indian Health Service, which is responsible for providing federal health services to Native peoples in the US, as a start toward improving health care in Indian Country. Another prime example comes from housing services.

Who said Indigenous peoples should be included in the conversation on reparations for Black Americans?

The issue returned to the public spotlight in February 2019, when Sen. Elizabeth Warren, at the time one of several Democratic 2020 presidential hopefuls, stated that Indigenous peoples should be included in the “conversation” on reparations for Black Americans.

What does the apology for Native Americans mean?

8113, "apologizes on behalf of the people of the United States to all Native Peoples for the many instances of violence, maltreatment, and neglect inflicted on Native Peoples by citizens of the United States;" and "expresses its regret for the ramifications of former wrongs and its commitment to build on the positive relationships of the past and present to move toward a brighter future where all the people of this land live reconciled as brothers and sisters, and harmoniously steward and protect this land together."

When did Obama acknowledge Native Americans?

Acknowledgement by President Obama. President Obama publicly acknowledged the "Apology to Native Peoples of the United States" in 2010.

How many Indians were removed from the East?

From 1830 to 1840, the U.S. army removed 60,000 Indians—Choctaw, Creek, Cherokee and others—from the East in exchange for new territory west of the Mississippi. Thousands died along the way of what became known as the “Trail of Tears.”. And as whites pushed ever westward, the Indian-designated territory continued to shrink.

Where did Custer attack the Indians?

Expecting another great surprise victory, Custer attacked the largest gathering of warriors on the high plains on June 25, 1876 —near Montana’s Little Big Horn river. Custer’s death at the hands of Indians making their own last stand only intensified propaganda for military revenge to bring “peace” to the frontier.

What did Tecumseh do to the Indians?

In the early 1800s, the rise of the charismatic Shawnee war leader, Tecumseh, and his brother, known as the Prophet, convinced Indians of various tribes that it was in their interest to stop tribal in-fighting and band together to protect their mutual interests. The decision by Indiana Territorial Governor (and later President) William Henry Harrison in 1811 to attack and burn Prophetstown, the Indian capital on the Tippecanoe River, while Tecumseh was away campaigning the Choctaws for more warriors, incited the Shawnee leader to attack again. This time he persuaded the British to fight alongside his warriors against the Americans. Tecumseh’s death and defeat at the Battle of the Thames in 1813 made the Ohio frontier “safe” for settlers—at least for a time.

Who killed the Christianized Delaware Indians?

In 1782, a group of militiamen from Pennsylvania killed 96 Christianized Delaware Indians, illustrating the growing contempt for native people. Captain David Williamson ordered the converted Delawares, who had been blamed for attacks on white settlements, to go to the cooper shop two at a time, where militiamen beat them to death with wooden mallets and hatchets.

Who led the attack on the Cheyennes?

On November 29, 1864, a former Methodist minister, John Chivington, led a surprise attack on peaceful Cheyennes and Arapahos on their reservation at Sand Creek in southeastern Colorado. His force consisted of 700 men, mainly volunteers in the First and Third Colorado Regiments.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9