what does it mean when treatment is staggered in amultiple baseline design

Full Answer

Are multiple baseline designs effective alternatives to group-randomized trials in Public Health Research?

Multiple baseline designs (MBDs) have been suggested as alternatives to group-randomized trials (GRT). We reviewed structural features of MBDs and considered their potential effectiveness in public health research. We also reviewed the effect of staggered starts on statistical power.

What is a staggered graph?

In it two or more (often three) behaviors, people or settings are plotted in a staggered graph where a change is made to one, but not the other two, and then to the second, but not the third behavior, person or setting.

Why do researchers use multiple baseline designs in research studies?

They often employ particular methods or recruiting participants. Multiple baseline designs are associated with potential confounds introduced by experimenter bias, which must be addressed to preserve objectivity. Particularly, researchers are advised to develop all test schedules and data collection limits beforehand.

What is staggered study design?

in survival analysis, a research design that allows for the entry or exit of participants at any time throughout the course of the study. In a typical survival analysis design, all samples have a common origin—they start at the same time—and there is a single, terminal event (typically, death).

How do you interpret multiple baseline designs?

2:194:04Multiple Baseline Design Explained - YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipRemember that the intervention is implemented for each student one at a time. If each student'sMoreRemember that the intervention is implemented for each student one at a time. If each student's multiplication skills increase after receiving the intervention. This shows a functional. Relationship.

What are the three variations of the multiple baseline design?

Three basic types of multiple baseline design are (a) multiple baseline across different behaviors of the same subject, (b) multiple baseline across the same behavior of different subjects, and (c) multiple baseline of the same behavior of one subject across different settings.

What are some of the weaknesses of multiple baseline design?

The main disadvantage of the multiple baseline design is that a high degree of planning is required to produce a successful implementation. The ABA or Reversal Design demonstrates the effect of the experimental variable by repeatedly introducing and withdrawing the experimental variable.

What is multiple treatment design?

Multi-element/alternating treatments design. -Two or more treatments are rapidly alternated; predetermined changes in conditions. -Differences in responding are a function of the stimulus/context. -Similar to the multiple reinforcement schedule used in basic research.

Do you withdraw intervention in a multiple baseline design?

Lastly, in the multiple-baseline-across-subjects design, the same behavior is studied for multiple individuals. This design has many advantages. Besides not requiring withdrawal of the intervention, it is fairly easy to conceptualize and is commonly accepted in applied settings by parents and teachers.

How does the multiple baseline design demonstrate an effect of the intervention?

The multiple-baseline design demonstrates the effect of an intervention by showing changes across separate behaviors (individuals or situations), when, and only when, a treatment intervention is introduced.

What is a multiple baseline design why is it used distinguish between multiple baseline designs across subjects across behaviors and across situations?

A multiple baseline design is used to measure the effectiveness of treatment when a behavior changes after the manipulation is introduced. It is used because multiple conditions rule out the chance of other events that influence behavior occurring in data, displaying the effectiveness of the treatment.

Why would a researcher use a multiple-baseline design?

Multiple base-line experiments are most commonly used in cases where the dependent variable is not expected to return to normal after the treatment has been applied, or when medical reasons forbid the withdrawal of a treatment. They often employ particular methods or recruiting participants.

What can be said about the internal validity of a multiple-baseline design?

Thus, the multiple-baseline design represents a simple AB design, but it is replicated more than once to establish the reliability of the effect. The internal validity of such a design is ensured by the multiple replications of the intervention delivered across subjects, settings, or behaviors.

Under what conditions is a multiple-baseline design more appropriate than a reversal design?

This is a procedure whereby a person observes his or her behavior systematically and records the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a target behavior. Under what conditions is a multiple-baseline design more appropriate than a reversal design? a. When the dependent variable is self-injurious or highly dangerous.

What is a multiple baseline design?

A multiple baseline design is used in medical, psychological, and biological research. The multiple baseline design was first reported in 1960 as used in basic operant research. It was applied in the late 1960s to human experiments in response to practical and ethical issues that arose in withdrawing apparently successful treatments from human subjects. In it two or more (often three) behaviors, people or settings are plotted in a staggered graph where a change is made to one, but not the other two, and then to the second, but not the third behavior, person or setting. Differential changes that occur to each behavior, person or in each setting help to strengthen what is essentially an AB design with its problematic competing hypotheses.

Why are differential changes attributable to the treatment?

Because treatment is started at different times, changes are attributable to the treatment rather than to a chance factor.

Why are nonconcurrent multiple baseline studies important?

This has the advantage of greater flexibility in recruitment of participants and testing location. For this reason, perhaps, nonconcurrent multiple baseline experiments are recommended for research in an educational setting. It is recommended that the experimenter selects time frames beforehand to avoid experimenter bias, but even when methods are used to improve validity, inferences may be weakened. Currently, there is debate as to whether nonconcurrent studies represent a real threat from history effects. It is generally agreed, however, that concurrent testing is more stable.

Why are baselines considered ex post facto?

This is because multiple baselines can provide data regarding the consensus of a treatment response. Such data can often not be gathered from ABA (reversal) designs for ethical or learning reasons. Experimenters are advised not to remove cases that do not exactly fit their criteria, as this may introduce sampling bias and threaten validity. Ex post facto recruitment methods are not considered true experiments, due to the limits of experimental control or randomized control that the experimenter has over the trait. This is because a control group may necessarily be selected from a discrete separate population. This research design is thus considered a quasi-experimental design .

Why are concurrent baseline studies useful?

This strategy is advantageous because it moderates several threats to validity, and history effects in particular. Concurrent multiple baseline designs are also useful for saving time, since all participants are processed at once. The ability to retrieve complete data sets within well defined time constraints is a valuable asset while planning research.

Why do we use multiple baselines?

Multiple base-line experiments are most commonly used in cases where the dependent variable is not expected to return to normal after the treatment has been applied, or when medical reasons forbid the withdrawal of a treatment. They often employ particular methods or recruiting participants. Multiple baseline designs are associated with potential confounds introduced by experimenter bias, which must be addressed to preserve objectivity. Particularly, researchers are advised to develop all test schedules and data collection limits beforehand.

What is A priori in research?

A priori (beforehand) specification of the hypothesis, time frames, and data limits help control threats due to experimenter bias. For the same reason researchers should avoid removing participants based on merit. Multiple probe designs may be useful in identifying extraneous factors which may be influencing your results. Lastly, experimenters should avoid gathering data during sessions alone. If in-session data is gathered a note of the dates should be tagged to each measurement in order to provide an accurate time-line for potential reviewers. This data may represent unnatural behaviour or states of mind, and must be considered carefully during interpretation.

What is a stepped wedge design?

In a stepped wedge design (SWD), an intervention is rolled out in a staggered manner over time, in groups of experimental units, so that by the end, all units experience the intervention. For example, in the MaxART study, the date at which to offer universal antiretroviral therapy to otherwise ineligible clients is being randomly assigned in nine "steps" of four months duration so that after three years, all 14 facilities in northern and central Swaziland will be offering early treatment. In the common alternative, the cluster randomized trial (CRT), experimental units are randomly allocated on a single common start date to the interventions to be compared. Often, the SWD is more feasible than the CRT, both for practical and ethical reasons, but takes longer to complete. The SWD permits both within- and between- unit comparisons, while the CRT only allows between-unit comparisons. Thus, confounding bias with respect to time-invariant factors tends to be lower in an SWD than a CRT, but the SWD cannot as readily control for confounding by time-varying factors. SWDs have generally more statistical power than CRTs, especially as the intraunit correlation and the number of participants within unit increases. Software for both designs are available, although for a more limited set of SWD scenarios.

Why are pragmatic clinical trials important?

Pragmatic trials will lead to improvements in how we deliver health care and promise to more rapidly translate research findings into practice. Methods: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Collaboratory was formed to conduct pragmatic clinical trials and to cultivate collaboration across research areas and disciplines to develop best practices for future studies. Through a two-stage grant process including a pilot phase (UH2) and a main trial phase (UH3), investigators across the Collaboratory had the opportunity to work together to improve all aspects of these trials before they were launched and to address new issues that arose during implementation. Seven Cores were created to address the various considerations, including Electronic Health Records; Phenotypes, Data Standards, and Data Quality; Biostatistics and Design Core; Patient-Reported Outcomes; Health Care Systems Interactions; Regulatory/Ethics; and Stakeholder Engagement. The goal of this article is to summarize the Biostatistics and Design Core's lessons learned during the initial pilot phase with seven pragmatic clinical trials conducted between 2012 and 2014. Results: Methodological issues arose from the five cluster-randomized trials, also called group-randomized trials, including consideration of crossover and stepped wedge designs. We outlined general themes and challenges and proposed solutions from the pilot phase including topics such as study design, unit of randomization, sample size, and statistical analysis. Our findings are applicable to other pragmatic clinical trials conducted within health care systems. Conclusion: Pragmatic clinical trials using the UH2/UH3 funding mechanism provide an opportunity to ensure that all relevant design issues have been fully considered in order to reliably and efficiently evaluate new interventions and treatments. The integrity and generalizability of trial results can only be ensured if rigorous designs and appropriate analysis choices are an essential part of their research protocols.

Overview

A multiple baseline design is used in medical, psychological, and biological research. The multiple baseline design was first reported in 1960 as used in basic operant research. It was applied in the late 1960s to human experiments in response to practical and ethical issues that arose in withdrawing apparently successful treatments from human subjects. In it two or more (often three) behaviors, people or settings are plotted in a staggered graph where a change is made to …

Recruiting participants

Concurrent designs

Nonconcurrent designs

Disadvantages

Managing threats to validity

See also

External links