What does GLM stand for?
The Good Lives Model (GLM; Ward et al., 2007) is an overarching theoretical framework for managing risk focusing on the individual's strengths and actively engaging the individual in their rehabilitation (Willis & Ward, 2013).
Is the GLM the recommended approach?
The GLM can be this is the recommended approach (Yates, et al., 2010). 2009). In other words, interventions are delivered in ways that maximise their relevance to
Can the GLM be applied to high-risk violent offenders?
and Collie (2007) applied the GLM with a high-risk violent offender. Whitehead et al. developing prosocial leisure pursuits. Both activities fostered moving away from associating
What is a GLM for children?
with children. Accordingly, interventions designed to develop relationship skills would comprise one component of a client’s GL plan. In this way, the GLM incorporates the RNR prosocial goods fulfilment). Along with the need principle, the GLM also accommodates the RNR principles of risk and responsivity.
Why is GLM-C a bridging theory?
What is the purpose of treatment programs for sexual offenders?
What is the good lives model?
Is GLM C prudential?
Is the goal of promoting goods possible for dangerous individuals who live in hostile environments?
See more
About this website
What does the Good Lives Model focus on?
The Good Lives Model (GLM)is a strengths-based rehabilitation theory that augments the risk, need,and responsivity principles of effective correctional intervention through its focus on assisting clients to develop and implement meaningful life plans that are incompatible with future offending.
Is GLM better than RNR?
GLM sets itself apart from RNR by its positive, strengths-based, and restorative model of rehabilitation. In addition, GLM hypothesizes that enhancing personal fulfillment will lead naturally to reductions in criminogenic needs, whereas RNR posits the reverse direction.
How would you define the good lives approach to rehabilitation?
The GLM takes a more holistic and constructive approach to rehabilitation, through enabling offenders to live better lives (i.e. good lives) as opposed to simply teaching offenders to avoid re-offending and, consequently, incarceration.
Who came up with the Good Lives Model?
Tony WardOver the past decade, the Good Lives Model of Offender Rehabilitation (GLM) has been systematically developed by Tony Ward and colleagues, and has been adopted by many different jurisdictions both locally and internationally.
What is a GLM in statistics?
The term "general" linear model (GLM) usually refers to conventional linear regression models for a continuous response variable given continuous and/or categorical predictors. It includes multiple linear regression, as well as ANOVA and ANCOVA (with fixed effects only).
What is RNR and GLM?
GLM sets itself apart from RNR by its positive, strengths-based, and restorative model of rehabilitation. In addition, GLM hypothesizes that enhancing personal fulfillment will lead naturally to reductions in criminogenic needs, whereas RNR posits the reverse direction.
What are primary goods GLM?
These “primary human goods” are as follows: (1) life (including healthy living and functioning); (2) knowledge; (3) excellence in play; (4) excellence in work (including mastery experiences); (5) excellence in agency (i.e., autonomy and self-directedness); (6) inner peace (i.e., freedom from emotional turmoil and ...
Where is the good lives model used?
The GLM is primarily applied by the treatment sector, however very recently, it has been used to generate a structured strengths based approach to case management.
When was the Good Lives Model introduced?
2002The GLM was first published in 2002 by Professor Tony Ward, who has continued to enhance and shape the model over the past decade. Since the original publications, several key scholars have also made significant contributions to the evolution of the model and its application.
What is Maps for change probation?
Maps for Change (M4C) is a toolkit of exercises which practitioners can use to structure their supervision with adult men who have committed a sexual offence and are assessed as low risk of reconviction.
Is the Good Lives Model CBT?
Integrated appropriately, the GLM offers potential for improving outcomes of programs following a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) approach and operating according to a narrow operationalization of risk, need, responsivity (RNR) principles.
What are the limitations of the Good Lives Model?
A lack of scope in good lives conceptualisations (e.g., through neglecting inner peace), and problems and/or conflict in the means used to pursue each good were evident, supporting the notion that difficulties fulfilling primary goods are implicated in offending.
(PDF) The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical ...
Aggression and Violent Behavior 12 (2007) 87 – 107 The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications Tony Ward a,⁎, Ruth E. Mann b , Theresa A. Gannon c a School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, P O Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand b Offending Behaviour Programmes Unit, United Kingdom c University of Kent, United Kingdom Received 20 October 2005 ...
Good Lives Model Workbook- Mark Carich and Bruce Cameron
DEVELOPING AND MAINTAINING A GOOD LIFE PLAN USING THE SELF-REGULATIONS MODEL AND GOOD LIVES MODEL MARK S. CARICH, PH.D. BRUCE CAMERON, M.S., LPC-S, LSOTP FEBRUARY, 2011 Developing and maintaining a good life plan using the self-regulations model and good lives model 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING THE WORKBOOK CHAPTER 2 GOOD LIFE PLAN AND GOOD LIVES MODEL CHAPTER 3 IDENTIFYING AND ...
The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical ... - CCOSO
The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications Tony Ward a,⁎, Ruth E. Mann b, Theresa A. Gannon c a School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, P O Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand b Offending Behaviour Programmes Unit, United Kingdom c University of Kent, United Kingdom Received 20 October 2005; received in revised form 15 February 2006; accepted 7 March ...
What is the GLM?
Primary goods. are certain states of mind, personal characteristics, and experiences that are intrinsically.
What is the GLM model?
The Good Lives Model (GLM) is an increasingly popular framework of offender rehabilitation used internationally for a variety of offending typologies. However, opponents have suggested the GLM is an ideological and intuition-based model, rather than an empirically supported framework.
How can we reduce re-offending rates?
Over the last two decades, empirical evidence has increasingly supported the view that it is possible to reduce re-offending rates by rehabilitating offenders rather than simply punishing them. In fact, the pendulum's swing back from a pure punishment model to a rehabilitation model is arguably one of the most significant events in modern correctional policy. This comprehensive review argues that rehabilitation should focus both on promoting human goods (i.e. providing the offender with the essential ingredients for a 'good' life), as well as reducing/avoiding risk. Offering a succinct summary and critique of the scientific approach to offender rehabilitation, this intriguing volume for students of criminology, sociology and clinical psychology gives a comprehensive evaluation of both the Risk-Need Model and the Good Lives Model. Rehabilitation is a value-laden process involving a delicate balance of the needs and desires of clinicians, clients, the State and the public. Written by two international leading academics in rehabilitation research, this book argues that intervention with offenders is not simply a matter of implementing the best therapeutic technology and leaving political and social debate to politicians and policy makers.
What is the Good Lives Model?
This chapter reviews that research supports incorporation of these techniques into offender rehabilitation initiatives. The Good Lives Model (GLM) capitalizes on this research by providing a practice framework in which each of these techniques can be naturally intertwined rather than grafted on to core treatment by the use of additional modules such as motivation al interviewing. The chapter provides an overview of the GLM and then reviews the growing body of empirical research investigating its utility and effectiveness in offender rehabilitation endeavours.
How many areas are there in the GLM?
modified version of the GLM, the eleven primary goods are condensed into six areas: “health. (good diet and exercise), mastery (in work and play), autonomy (self-directiveness), relatedness (intimate/sexual relationship, family friends, kinship, and community), inner.
Is criminogenic need always incompatible with offending?
they are incompatible with offending. It is important to grasp that criminogenic needs always
What are the four types of criminal behavior?
In the case of criminal behavior, it is hypothesized there are four major types. of difficulties: (1) problems with the means used to secure goods, (2) a lack of scope. within a good lives plan, (3) the presence of conflict among goals (goods sought) or.
What is the Good Lives model?
The Good Lives Model (GLM) is an increasingly popular framework of offender rehabilitation used internationally for a variety of offending typologies. However, opponents have suggested the GLM is an ideological and intuition-based model, rather than an empirically supported framework. The current article systematically reviews the literature pertaining to two aspects of the GLM. Firstly, the GLM assumptions (primary goods, obstacles, and pathways to offending), and, secondly, outcomes of GLM-consistent interventions (recidivism, pre-post treatment change, and service user perspectives). Electronic and hand searches were conducted and completed in August 2019; N = 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, with n = 12 examining the GLM's assumptions, and n = 5 assessing outcomes of GLM-consistent interventions. Findings were mixed regarding the GLM assumptions, although this may be due to differences in measurements used to assess primary goods across studies. However, GLM-consistent interventions were found to be at least as effective as standard relapse prevention programs, whilst enhancing participants' motivation to change and engagement in treatment. To fully establish the GLM as an empirically supported model, more high quality, rigorous evaluations of both the GLM assumptions and outcomes of GLM-consistent interventions is needed.
What does it mean when treatment adheres to these principles?
Specifically, meta-analytic research indicates that, when treatment adheres to these principles, it is associated with reduced sexual re-offending.
What is responsivity in correctional treatment?
Specifically, this principle indicates that treatment, in addition to being cognitive-behavioral in orientation (see Andrews & Bonta, 2010 ), should be delivered in a manner that is responsive to various characteristics of the individual, such as language, culture, personality style, intelligence, anxiety levels , learning styles, and cognitive abilities, in order to increase their engagement and participation in treatment to ensure maximal effectiveness ( Andrews & Bonta, 2010 ). These factors can affect clients' engagement with treatment, their motivation, their ability to understand and apply information presented in treatment to their own personal circumstances, and their manner of processing information presented in treatment. Therefore, treatment implementation should be varied and adapted to individual styles and abilities in order to maximize effectiveness, which involves significant skill on the part of clinicians.
What is the treatment of sexual offender?
Although there is some debate regarding whether treatment with sexual offenders is effective, cognitive-behavioral treatment remains the most widely accepted and empirically supported model of sexual offender treatment with respect to reducing recidivism (e.g., Hanson et al., 2002; Lösel, & Schmucker, 2005 ). Based on behavioral, cognitive, and social learning theory and models (e.g., Bandura, 1986; Beck, 1964, 1967, 1976; Yates et al., 2000, 2010 ), sexual offending is conceptualized as behavioral and cognitive patterns that are developed and maintained as a result of modeling, observational learning, and reinforcement of behavior, attitudes, and cognition. The focus of treatment is on altering patterns of behavioral, cognitive, and affective responding associated with sexual offending, such that such problematic, deviant, and/or criminal behavioral patterns and responses are replaced with adaptive, non-deviant, pro-social responding. In doing so, treatment targets such responses as these are related to the specific dynamic risk factors known to be linked to risk for re-offending, as described above.
Is sexual offender treatment a model?
While not a model of sexual offender treatment per se, the characteristics of therapists and the approaches they use in treatment, have been found in research to be associated with improved treatment outcomes ( Beech & Fordham, 1997; Fernandez et al., 2006; Hanson et al., 2009; Marshall et al., 1999, 2002; Shingler & Mann, 2006; Yates, 2002; Yates et al., 2000 ). For example, research indicates that establishing a positive therapeutic relationship with the client accounts for a significant proportion of the variance in treatment outcome Fernandez et al., 2006; Hanson, 2009; Witte, Gu, Nicholaichuck, & Wong, 2001; Mann, Webster, Schofield, & Marshall, 2004; Marshall et al., 1999, 2003 ).
Do low risk offenders need specialized treatment?
In fact, low risk offenders likely do not require specialized treatment at all, and will benefit from routine supervision ( Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Hanson & Yates, 2013 ). Adherence to the risk principle, in addition to being the best use of limited resources, demonstrates that treatment is most effective when its level of intensity is matched ...
Is the sex offenders model accepted?
Nonetheless, this model was adopted in the treatment of sexual offenders, and continues to be an accepted approach to treatment, in spite of a lack of empirical research supporting its application to intervention with sexual offenders ( Hanson, 1996, 2000; Laws, 2003; Laws, Hudson, & Ward, 2000; Laws & Ward, 2006; Yates, 2003, 2005; Yates & Kingston, 2005; Yates & Ward, 2007 ).
What is the purpose of deterring ppl from committing crimes?
Deter ppl from committing crime in the future. -Trying to achieve a goal (something other than just punishing them) -Offenders will be deterred from committing crimes as a result of a rational calculation that the costs of punishment are too great. -Punishment is so bad that the person & others will commit crimes.
Which group supported rehabilitation the most and were least punitive?
1. Blacks supported rehabilitation the most & were least punitive
What punishment did a PPL receive for something they did?
2. Retribution: Ppl received a punishment for something they did
Why is GLM-C a bridging theory?
In the GLM-C, an individual is hypothesized to commit criminal offences because he lacks the capabilities to realize valued outcomes in personally fulfilling and socially acceptable ways. We suggest that the GLM-C can act as a bridging theory by explaining more fully (via the etiological fleshing out of some of its assumptions) what it is that offenders seek through antisocial actions.
What is the purpose of treatment programs for sexual offenders?
Thus treatment programs for sexual offenders are typically problem-focused and aim to eradicate or reduce the various psychological and behavioral difficulties associated with sexually abusive behavior.
What is the good lives model?
In order to provide therapists with a rehabilitation approach that preserves the strengths of the RNM while avoiding its weaknesses, we developed the good lives model, a strength based perspective concerned with promoting offenders' goals alongside managing their risk ( Ward & Stewart, 2003b ).
Is GLM C prudential?
It is important to note that the goods referred to in the GLM-C model are prudential rather than moral goods. That is, they are experiences and activities that are likely to result in enhanced levels of well-being rather than morally good actions. There is no assumption that individuals are inherently or naturally good in an ethical sense. Rather, the assumption is that that because of their nature, human beings are more likely to function well if they have access to the various types of goods outlined above.
Is the goal of promoting goods possible for dangerous individuals who live in hostile environments?
It has been argued by critics of the strength based approaches such as the GLM-C that they are too idealistic and simplistic. The goal of promoting goods, it is claimed, is not possible for dangerous individuals who live in hostile environments. Our reply is quite simple. First, we propose that the pursuit of primary human goods is implicated in the etiology of sexual offending. Offenders by virtue of possessing the same needs and nature as the rest of us, actively search for primary human goods in their environments (e.g., relationships, mastery experiences, a sense of belonging, a sense of purpose, autonomy etc). In some circumstances, this can lead to antisocial behavior. Second, therapeutic actions that promote approach goals will also help to secure avoidance goals. We argue that the causal conditions required to eliminate (or modify) dynamic risk factors (i.e., criminogenic needs) are likely in turn to promote specific goods (goals). Third, it is easier to motivate offenders to change their offense related characteristics by focusing on the perceived benefits accruing from their offending. This proposal addresses the issues of offender motivation and responsivity. Furthermore, therapy for sexual offenders always has a twin focus: promoting offender goods and managing risk, both are necessary and jointly sufficient for effective outcomes.