A physician may legally withhold treatment when the infant is chronically and irreversibly comatose, will most certainly die and for whom treatment is considered futile, and would suffer inhumanely if treatment were provided. The medical examiner is attempting to eliminate a suspect in a crime.
When can a physician legally withhold treatment from a comatose infant?
A physician may legally withhold treatment when the infant is chronically and irreversibly comatose, will most certainly die and for whom treatment is considered futile, and would suffer inhumanely if treatment were provided. The medical examiner is attempting to eliminate a suspect in a crime.
When is a medical practitioner liable for treating a minor without consent?
"A medical practitioner will generally not be liable for treating a minor patient without parental consent when an emergency makes it impractical or dangerous to delay treatment in order to obtain such consent".
Can a parent refuse medical treatment for their child?
Outside of these circumstances, parents have the right to consent or refuse medical treatment for their children. For example: If a child has a terminal condition and several doctors agree that treatment is no longer beneficial for the child, then the parents have the right to refuse treatment and seek hospice care for their child.
Can a 17 year old go to the doctor on their own?
Depending on the state, teenagers may have the ability to go to a doctor’s office on their own and make decisions regarding their health care without their parents’ or the state’s consent. Typically, states view 16 or 17-year-olds as non-minor children.
Which of the following legislation allows physicians to legally withhold treatment?
Assignment and Quiz AnswersQuestionAnswerWhich of the following legislation allows physicians to legally withhold treatment, including food and water, from infants who are chronically and irreversibly comatose?Federal Child Abuse AmendmentsAmniocentesis is what type of genetic testing?Prenatal testing40 more rows
Which of the following is true regarding the legal rights of newborns in the United States?
Which of the following is true regarding the legal rights of newborns in the United States? They are the same as for any other American citizen of any age. A teenager who is pregnant receives an abortion without parental notice due to "judicial bypass." What does this term signify?
In which of the following situations is a physician not expected to obtain consent before proceeding with treatment?
In which of the following situations is a physician not expected to obtain consent before proceeding with treatment? The Correct Answer is: When a patient is mentally incompetent or unconscious.
What does the law require of a physician regarding treating patients?
Principle VI of the American Medical Association's (AMA) “Principles of Medical Ethics,” states that a “physician shall, in the provision of appropriate patient care, except in emergencies, be free to choose whom to serve, with whom to associate, and the environment in which to provide medical care” [1].
Can parents withhold medical information from their child?
Under some circumstances, respect for patient autonomy can paradoxically support withholding medical information. If a patient expresses a desire not to know all or some medical information, then the physician should respect that decision and withhold that information [21, 22].
When can a child consent to medical treatment?
People aged 16 or over are entitled to consent to their own treatment. This can only be overruled in exceptional circumstances. Like adults, young people (aged 16 or 17) are presumed to have sufficient capacity to decide on their own medical treatment, unless there's significant evidence to suggest otherwise.
What are the two exceptions to informed consent?
Several exceptions to the requirement for informed consent include (1) the patient is incapacitated, (2) life-threatening emergencies with inadequate time to obtain consent, and (3) voluntary waived consent.
Who can consent to medical treatment for an incapable patient?
Three people (one doctor and two others who cannot be doctors) have to certify that the person concerned is capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment and has consented to it. These three people are appointed by the Care Quality Commission (CQC).
For which of the following examples would implied consent not to be legally appropriate?
medlaw practiceQuestionAnswerFor which of the following examples would implied consent not be legally appropriate?A patient agrees to a test for HIV.The law that mandated electronic health records and provides the rules for patient access to their records isHIPPA32 more rows
For what reasons might a provider not want to accept a patient?
The most common reason for refusing to accept a patient is the patient's potential inability to pay for the necessary medical services.
Can a doctor refuse to treat a patient?
As a rule of thumb, if unnecessary delays in care may cause irreparable harm, physicians can face legal liability for their refusal to treat. If you need urgent medical attention, and a doctor refuses to treat you, you can pursue a medical malpractice suit against the physician and/or the establishment they work for.
In what situations is consent not required?
The only exceptions are: in an emergency when the patient lacks capacity and the patient's express wishes are unknown; or • where the law otherwise allows or requires treatment to be given without consent.