Treatment FAQ

only when you have stable baseline data can you proceed to treatment.

by Lavina Bayer Published 2 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Only when you have stable baseline data can you proceed to treatment. Some threats to quality data include indirect measurement, an insensitive measurement scale, poorly scheduled observation periods, and inadequate observer training.

Is it time to create a health baseline?

Baseline Data. Once you have target behavior and behavioral definition you need to start taking baseline data. Baseline data has two purposes (1) to show function and (2) to determine if an improvement has been made. Basically baseline data is going to tell you what road to take and it will also make sure you are continuously on the right track.

What is baseline data and why do you need it?

Aug 17, 2010 · The goal for each graph is to continue adding data points to the baseline phase by clicking the “Continue Running Current Phase Button” until you have enough data points that you would begin the next phase (e.g., “treatment”) if this were an applied research project you were supervising or conducting.

What is a stable baseline?

Oct 16, 2020 · How Baseline of Behavior Works. This baseline of behavior is measured before an intervention is begun. The child's teacher or another faculty member would measure the baseline rate of the student's off-task behavior before implementing a behavior modification system designed to increase the student's on-task behavior.

What does it mean when the baseline is unstable?

Jan 27, 2015 · These are just a few of the many things that can be assessed and addressed as part of your health baseline. Together, you and your primary care provider can prioritize health problems and determine effective interventions. Once you’ve developed a baseline, how often should you repeat the assessment? Follow up is variable once a baseline is ...

Why did participants continue baseline?

The two types of comments that occurred most often after participants were asked why they continued baseline was that either one data point was insufficient to change phases (six experts and nine BCBAs) or that three data points are required for a baseline (four experts and two BCBAs). Although some participants changed phases at three data points for graphs with stable data paths, some participants chose to exceed this minimum by one or two data points. We also provided the participants with the opportunity to provide any additional comments. In this section, three experts stated that their decisions might have been different if more information about the type of treatment that would follow was provided. These experts might have reduced the number of data points in baseline if the treatment was one that was likely to produce a strong effect. Three experts and three BCBAs commented that their decisions may have been affected by information about the topography of the response (e.g., severe self-injurious behavior). Although the response topography never was provided, one participant in the BCBA group stopped the graph after one data point and made comments suggesting that she would evaluate the safety of conducting sessions with such a high-rate behavior or attempt different analyses.

What was provided after the experimental program began?

After the experimental program began, participants were provided with informed consent followed by instructions for using the program. The instructions stated that

What are the questions asked in Austin and Mawhinney?

Austin and Mawhinney (1999)and Mawhinney and Austin (1999)asked participants to respond to data presented point by point. Graphs were from currently or subsequently published data sets with phase lines removed. Across the two studies, participants were asked to make general comments about the data (Austin & Mawhinney), to characterize the data in terms of structured categories (e.g., stability and trend; Mawhinney & Austin ), and to identify the point at which intervention was initiated. Compared with other research on visual inspection, these two studies presented data in a manner that was more similar to the daily decisions made during the research process. These studies also differed from previous research in that participants responded to published data sets, whereas most other studies (e.g., DeProspero & Cohen, 1979; Furlong & Wampold, 1982; Kahng et al., 2010; Matyas & Greenwood, 1990) presented computer-generated graphs that may not resemble data typically encountered by participants.

How were BCBAs recruited?

First, we created a computerized spreadsheet from the certificant registry on the BACB Web site (http://www.bacb.com). The spreadsheet randomly selected 20 BCBAs at a time. We contacted these people via e-mail to request their participation in the study. After confirmation, participants were sent the experimental program. Four of the 77 people randomly selected from all of the BCBAs listed in the certificant registry responded to an initial e-mail and completed the experimental program. Due to the low response rate with the first method, we recruited additional participants by e-mailing a variety of schools and service agencies that employed BCBAs to ask if any of their employees would be interested in participating. Through this recruiting method, nine additional e-mails with the experimental program attached were sent, and six participants returned their responses. A total of 10 BCBAs completed the experimental program.

Why were the graphs in Study 1 and Study 2 used?

These graphs were chosen because responses from Study 1 showed poor agreement with these graphs. The variability in responses in Study 1 suggested that these graphs would provide a baseline that might be sensitive to information manipulations. However, Graph 5 was modified slightly to prevent information in the graph from conflicting with the additional information provided. First, the y-axis label in Graph 5 was changed from “number of correct responses” to “responses.” Second, the expected change in direction was altered from “increase” to “decrease” because one type of information involved labeling the target response as severe self-injury. This modification seemed reasonable, given the relatively high level of behavior depicted in Graph 5 (see Figure 1).

What is the purpose of study 1?

The purpose of Study 1 was to describe and compare the length of baseline phases created by experts in applied behavior analysis, BCBAs, and novices in applied behavior analysis when data were presented point by point.

How many participants were in Study 2?

The participants in Study 2 were students studying behavior analysis in doctoral programs across the United States. Students were contacted either directly via e-mail or through their academic advisers. The experimental program was sent to 19 students, and eight participants in this group completed both Sessions 1 and 2. Of the eight participants, four were BCBAs, one was a BCaBA, and three were not certified.

How many bites of food does Julia need to leave the table?

Now, Julia's behavior therapist will not allow Julia to leave the table until she completes at least 3 bites of the nonpreferred food,even if she cries, screams, or engages in other problem behavior.

What is the purpose of providing examples and non-examples?

The primary purpose of providing examples and non-examples is to: help data collectors carefully discriminate between occurrence of the target behavior and non-occurrence. The fundamental dimensions of behavior include all of the following except. locus of behavior.

Who published the behavior of organisms?

Skinner's publication of The Behavior of Organisms

What is the purpose of a parametric study?

The purpose of collecting data in a systematic way and graphing them using single subject research design is to: predict, verify, replicate.

What is the purpose of collecting data on the accuracy and reliability of the IV?

Collect data on the accuracy and reliability of the IV to determine if the actual implementation of all of the experimental conditions over the course of the study matches the description in the reported methodology.

What are the threats to quality data?

Some threats to quality data include indirect measurement, an insensitive measurement scale, poorly scheduled observation periods, and inadequate observer training.

Do behavior analytic researchers use group research designs?

In behavior analytic research, we seldom use group research designs. How do we demonstrate external validity?

What is baseline measurement?

The term baseline measurement can refer to a measurement of any problem—be it a child's behavior problems or a social ill in one's community . In terms of a child who's acting out, however, a baseline measurement refers to the beginning measurement of a behavior.

What is baseline behavior?

This baseline of behavior is measured before an intervention is begun. The child's teacher or another faculty member would measure the baseline rate of the student's off-task behavior before implementing a behavior modification system designed to increase the student's on-task behavior.

How often does a child blurt out answers in class?

After using behavior modification strategies, the teacher finds that the child now only blurts out answers in class about five times a day.

When basline data are not available, what is the purpose of using your own data?

Where basline data are not available, your own data will set the base line for comparisons after your study. Employing a statistical technique did not reuire a baseline data. For example, you are emplying an experimental treatment for the first time.

Why are case studies useful?

I find case studies useful for monitoring change over time if there is no baseline information. Ask the respondents what was your situation before? what changes did you make? what have been the impacts so far? But you have to do this early on in the intervention process so that the first impact change report is akin to a baseline. You can then monitor and measure impacts over time, be they physical, financial, environmental, personal, social, cultural, knowledge based etc,

What are the two things that can help address sampling bias?

consistency and robustness of results. Both can help address sampling bias when

Which is better for testing and measurements: ISO or ISO?

You use environmental or impact analysis criteria. ISO standard will be better for testing and measurements. Experts will identify the intensity of impacts even baseline data are absent of the particular intervention. Every intervention in the earth is not occur once in a time so that intervention already found in the next place, we can use that reference also.

Can you choose part of the sample from areas unaffected by agricultural extension and the rest from comparable areas where a

You could perhaps choose part of the sample from areas unaffected by agricultural extension and the rest from comparable areas where ag ext has been introduced. A comparison of the two should give you some idea about the effects of ag ext.

Is comparison of with and without intervention a method?

Comparison of with and without intervention is sometimes used as a method but that is not fully appropriate. Recall baseline data can be collected, as some respondents have suggested. This is is not perfect but better than not having any baseline. After all the purpose is to estimate the general pattern of change or impact, not the unique values of any change as no sample based estimate is fully accurate.

Can we confirm the hypothesis of IVs and DV?

i assume, we cannot confirm hypothesis, but we cannot reject it, as there is no proof, that there is no relation between IVs and DV.

How long should intervention data be collected?

Although there is no specific length of time for which intervention data should be collected or evaluated, below are some guidelines to help in the team’s decision-making. In general, data collection:

How often was data collected in David's case?

In David’s case, data were collected every other day (even though the intervention was implemented daily). The team convened after four observations to evaluate David’s response to the intervention.

Why do we use the same graph for David's case?

They were able to use the same graph because both his intervention and fidelity data were calculated using percentages. By doing this, the team can more easily see whether there is a relationship between implementation fidelity and the student’s behavior.

What is implementation fidelity checklist?

The implementation fidelity checklist shows data collected during the first observation. As you can see on the form, the teacher did not implement the intervention with fidelity (i.e., greater than 80%) during the first observation. She receives additional instruction on the details of the implementation plan and subsequently implements the intervention with high fidelity during the remaining observations. Because she implemented the intervention with fidelity during the next two observations, the team determines that they can reduce the frequency of these observations to once per week.

How to collect data for intervention?

Although there is no specific length of time for which intervention data should be collected or evaluated, below are some guidelines to help in the team’s decision-making. In general, data collection: 1 Follows a schedule that is guided by the type and severity of the problem or target behavior and the intervention design. 2 Does not occur all day, nor even for an entire period. Instead, data should be collected during the times when the problem behavior can most likely be observed, and then for only a representative period of time. 3 Should occur frequently enough (e.g., daily, every other day) to allow the team members to determine whether a behavioral change is occurring. 4 Can be reduced (e.g., once per week) when the data indicate that the behavior has reached the desired level for at least three observations.

Why is intervention data analysis important?

Intervention data analysis helps the team to determine how well the plan is working and whether they need to make any changes in the intervention procedures. As they undertake their analysis, the team will determine whether:

Why is it important to evaluate the implementation fidelity?

If there is little or no change in the student’s behavior, it could be that the intervention is not being implemented as designed. For this reason, it is important to evaluate the implementation fidelity. The team can use this information to determine whether the teacher is implementing the intervention as designed or whether additional training or follow-up with the teacher is warranted.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9