Treatment FAQ

individuals should engage in policy advocacy when treatment or care can be harmful to consumers

by Luisa Klein Published 2 years ago Updated 2 years ago
image

How does healthcare advocacy influence public policy?

When successful, healthcare advocacy that influences public policy improves individual and community health, which reduces health disparities. Such advocacy guides health policy goals, gets priority legislation passed, and secures the funding needed to support the new policies enacted.

Do not assume that policy advocacy is not feasible?

Do not assume that policy advocacy is not feasible because people have different values and points of view. Guideline #8 Do not violate NASW's Code of Ethics.

What are the guidelines for engaging in policy advocacy?

Engage in respectful debate that does not negatively characterize opponents' personal character, morality, or intentions. Guideline #6 Ascertain if compromises are possible that "split differences" between contending factions Guideline #7 Do not assume that policy advocacy is not feasible because people have different values and points of view.

Do policy and decision makers respond to advocacy proposals?

Some advocacy work is more reactive than proactive towards policy makers, or is explicitly dialogical. In any case, policy and decision makers may well respond to advocacy proposals with their own questions or alternative proposals. Other interested parties may launch strategies to counter the proposals being made.

image

Why is policy and advocacy important in healthcare?

Advocacy plays a key role in building strong health systems. It gives people a voice in the decisions that affect their lives and health and helps hold governments accountable for meeting the health needs of all people, including marginalized groups.

What is patient advocacy and why is it important?

Healthcare advocates give patients and their families direct, customized assistance in navigating the healthcare system. A healthcare advocate's role entails: Helping patients access health care. Educating patients so they can make well-informed healthcare decisions.

What are the benefits of patient advocacy?

5 Benefits of a Patient AdvocateUnderstanding and Explaining Medical Communications. ... Logistics Experts. ... Employment and Insurance Advocacy. ... Organizing and Monitoring Medications and Treatment. ... Legal and Family Assistance.

Why is it important to ensure the individual is involved in their own care planning?

Evidence tells us that supporting patients to be actively involved in their own care, treatment and support can improve outcomes and experience for patients, and potentially yield efficiency savings for the system through more personalised commissioning and supporting people to stay well and manage their own conditions ...

How does an advocacy group help the community to be aware of one's issues and concerns?

Advocacy seeks to ensure that all people in society are able to: Have their voice heard on issues that are important to them. Protect and promote their rights. Have their views and wishes genuinely considered when decisions are being made about their lives.

What does advocacy mean in healthcare?

A person who helps guide a patient through the healthcare system. This includes help going through the screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of a medical condition, such as cancer.

What is the role of an advocate in health and social care?

The role of an advocate in health and social care is to support a vulnerable or disadvantaged person and ensure that their rights are being upheld in a healthcare context. Health and social care advocacy means supporting people who are unable to ensure their best interests are being taken care of.

Why is advocacy important in social work?

Advocacy is a key part of social work because it helps clients learn to be independent and provides a voice for those who are traditionally underserved. Advocacy promotes equality, inclusion and social justice, all goals of social work practice.

How do you advocate for patients provide an example?

You can advocate for your patients in a variety of ways, including these ten examples:Educate the patient. ... Update the entire team. ... Be present. ... Ensure safety. ... Double-check documentation. ... Give proper care. ... Offer resources. ... Listen to your patient.More items...•

Why is it important for an individual to have as much information as possible about their diagnosis treatment and future expectations?

Informed consent is more than just a legal responsibility for the doctor. Without high quality information upfront, it's very difficult for any patient to make the right decision when it comes to their health & what treatment plan best suits them.

Why is it important to promote independence in health and social care?

It can help their physical and mental health, boost their confidence and self-esteem, and improve their sense of purpose and quality of life. It can help them feel useful, which is especially important if they tend to fear they're a burden on loved ones.

What is meant by establishing consent with individuals when providing care and support and why is this important?

Establishing consent is one way care workers can demonstrate they respect the individual and the individual's personal dignity. The process of establishing consent is instrumental to developing trust between care worker and the individual.

Why is healthcare advocacy important?

Healthcare advocacy can supply comfort, empowerment, and support to patients during challenging times. Given the complex nature of today’s healthcare system, patients deserve people with expertise in their corner. Cultivating the skills and knowledge needed to guide and advocate for patients effectively requires the right education.

What is broad healthcare advocacy?

Broad healthcare advocacy encourages reforms that put the newest research into practice and cultivate better partnerships within the healthcare industry. It also strives to push for health policies that better account for factors such as poverty, as well as other social and economic circumstances that affect people’s health.

Why is it important for patients to pick up on body language?

As a result, patient advocates must pick up on body language and other nonverbal cues to getto the bottom of what patients are thinking and ask the right questions.

What is healthcare facilitation?

While healthcare advocates may have areas of specialization, their cases often require them to work across the spectrum of advocacy services. Facilitation sits at the heart of healthcare advocacy. Patient advocates do not make decisions for their clients, rather they make them aware of their options.

What does a patient advocate do?

The patient advocate arranges a conference call with the client and her doctors. After confirming the client’s medications and dosages, the advocate researches local pharmacies and advises her client about their hours and delivery options. She arranges for her client to stock up on medicines that may take longer to refill due to the pandemic. From there, the advocate regularly checks in with her client, offering medication reminders and asking about any other needs.

What is a private case manager?

Private case managers provide direct patient advocacy. They interact with patients, families, doctors, healthcare facilities, hospitals, and insurance companies. Private case managers either work independently or for advocacy organizations that assign them to client cases.

How many people cannot navigate the healthcare system?

In fact, a Harvard Business Review analysis found that 52 percent of patients in the U.S. cannot navigate the healthcare system’s complexity without help.

How does treatment engagement affect mental health?

Individuals living with serious mental illness are often difficult to engage in ongoing treatment, with high dropout rates. Poor engagement may lead to worse clinical outcomes, with symptom relapse and rehospitalization. Numerous variables may affect level of treatment engagement, including therapeutic alliance, accessibility of care, and a client's trust that the treatment will address his/her own unique goals. As such, we have found that the concept of recovery‐oriented care, which prioritizes autonomy, empowerment and respect for the person receiving services, is a helpful framework in which to view tools and techniques to enhance treatment engagement. Specifically, person‐centered care, including shared decision making, is a treatment approach that focuses on an individual's unique goals and life circumstances. Use of person‐centered care in mental health treatment models has promising outcomes for engagement. Particular populations of people have historically been difficult to engage, such as young adults experiencing a first episode of psychosis, individuals with coexisting psychotic and substance use disorders, and those who are homeless. We review these populations and outline how various evidence‐based, recovery‐oriented treatment techniques have been shown to enhance engagement. Our review then turns to emerging treatment strategies that may improve engagement. We focus on use of electronics and Internet, involvement of peer providers in mental health treatment, and incorporation of the Cultural Formulation Interview to provide culturally competent, person‐centered care. Treatment engagement is complex and multifaceted, but optimizing recovery‐oriented skills and attitudes is essential in delivery of services to those with serious mental illness.

How can decision making tools be used in treatment settings?

Web‐based and electronic decision making tools can be helpful for implementation of shared decision making in treatment settings. One study examined the utility of incorporating a computer‐based tool for shared decision making in a waiting area of a community mental health clinic, where individuals with serious mental illness received treatment. Participants used this tool prior to doctor's appointments, which generated a written sheet outlining any decisional conflicts they had to bring up with the physician. Participants found this useful in clarifying their own dilemmas, in allowing them to bring up difficult topics, and in organizing their thoughts21. Other web‐based and electronic decision making tools have been developed, and are generally accepted by both patients and clinicians22.

How important is working alliance in psychosis?

Within the first episode psychosis population, Melau et al11examined the association between working alliance and clinical and functional outcomes, and concluded that an initial strong working alliance may serve as a prerequisite for adherence to services specialized for first episode psychosis , laying a foundation for positive treatment outcome .

What is a first episode psychosis program?

First episode psychosis programs, with multidisciplinary teams comprised of therapists and supported education and employment specialists , have gained momentum internationally23, 24. These programs provide early access to care and intensive psychosocial services, in efforts to decrease duration of untreated psychosis, improve symptom burden, and enhance recovery25. Specialized first episode psychosis programs may have greater success in engaging young people in care than routine mental health services26, keeping people in treatment longer than standard community clinics27.

Why are first episode psychosis programs purposefully placed outside of traditional adult mental health clinics?

Many first episode psychosis programs are purposefully placed outside of traditional adult mental health clinics, as it has been shown that these settings are identified with alienation and treatment dropout28, 29. Strong engagement may be related to enhancing a young person's wish to be respected, supported and understood7.

What are the elements of assertive community treatment?

A recent qualitative study with assertive community treatment staff, not focused on those who are homeless, identified the following as primary elements for engaging clients36: therapeutic alliance between staff and clients, persistence and consistency, the provision of practical assistance and support rather than a sole focus on medications, the team decision making process, acceptance of clients as they are, and flexibility. A British study of engagement in assertive community treatment compared to community mental health teams, again not specific to homeless individuals, found that the small caseloads and team approach of assertive community treatment facilitated treatment engagement37.

What is assertive outreach?

Assertive outreach to homeless individuals involves making contact with them on their terms – where they live – rather than at an agency setting33. Assertive community treatment is an evidence‐based practice that has been adapted for homeless individuals. It uses a multidisciplinary team‐based approach to provide case management, mental health and substance use treatment, crisis intervention, employment support, and family services to individuals in the community. Homeless assertive community treatment teams have been found to decrease psychiatric hospitalization and emergency room use, increase housing stability, reduce symptom severity and, particularly relevant for engagement, increase outpatient visits34, 35.

What is advocacy in policy?

Advocacy is an important driver for the passage, implementation and enforcement of policy interventions. What are policy interventions? Policy interventions are designed to change the context in which people make decisions about behaviors. These include the physical environment such as limiting access to and availability of alcohol, tobacco and other substances through zoning laws that restrict the number of alcohol, tobacco, and where relevant, marijuana outlets within an area, enforcing laws and regulations regarding the age limits on purchasing these substances and raising the taxes on them. It also includes the social environment, by reinforcing non-use norms and attitudes such as banning use of tobacco in business establishments, restaurants, bars and other public places.

What is the role of prevention professionals?

Prevention professionals are often the “voice of prevention” for a community. As experts in prevention, they can improve understanding among the public and decision-makers about the type of policies and programming that can make a difference in preventing substance use and other problem behaviors. Advocacy has played an important role in such efforts as implementing smoking prevention policies which has led to the lowest levels of smoking in modern history. Let’s start with policies, regulations, and laws?

What is health advocacy?

In the medical profession, activities related to ensuring access to care, navigating the system, mobilizing resources, addressing health inequities, influencing health policy and creating system change are known as health advocacy. Foundational concepts in health advocacy include social determinants of health and health inequities. The social determinants of health (i.e. the conditions in which people live and work) account for a significant proportion of an individual's and a population's health outcomes. Health inequities are disparities in health between populations, perpetuated by economic, social, and political forces. Although it is clear that efforts to improve the health of an individual or population must consider "upstream" factors, how this is operationalized in medicine and medical education is controversial. There is a lack of clarity around how health advocacy is delineated, how physicians' scope of responsibility is defined and how teaching and assessment is conceptualized and enacted. Numerous curricular interventions have been described in the literature; however, regardless of the success of isolated interventions, understanding health advocacy instruction, assessment and evaluation will require a broader examination of processes, practices and values throughout medicine and medical education. To support the instruction, assessment and evaluation of health advocacy, a novel framework for health advocacy is introduced. This framework was developed for several purposes: defining and delineating different types and approaches to advocacy, generating a "roadmap" of possible advocacy activities, establishing shared language and meaning to support communication and collaboration across disciplines and providing a tool for the assessment of learners and for the evaluation of teaching and programs. Current approaches to teaching and assessment of health advocacy are outlined, as well as suggestions for future directions and considerations.

What are the foundational concepts of health advocacy?

Foundational concepts in health advocacy include social determinants of health and health inequities. The social determinants of health (i.e. the conditions in which people live and work) account for a significant proportion of an individual's and a population's health outcomes.

What is health inequities?

Health inequities are disparities in health between populations, perpetuated by economic, social, and political forces. Although it is clear that efforts to improve the health of an individual or population must consider "upstream" factors, how this is operationalized in medicine and medical education is controversial.

What is the care model and culture?

Care models were described as focused on care coordination, including coordination of physical, mental, behavioral, and substance-use-specific services. All health plan representatives described their case managers, care coordinators, and community health workers as promoting beneficiaries' use of services included within the plan's benefit array. Health plan leadership and contracting staff also described efforts to convey the health plan's mission statement when meeting with new providers to reinforce the plans' commitment to continuous engagement with beneficiaries, knowing that beneficiary receptiveness will vary over time.

What percentage of people with SUDs received treatment in 2015?

In 2015, only 18% of the population with SUDs received treatment--a number that has not increased significantly since 2002. For the definition of SUD and other key terms, see Table A.1. Glossary of terms and definitions. Terms and Definitions.

How many health plans participated in the IET study?

Representatives from six health plans participated in interviews. The plans served geographically diverse populations across the United States, and all were ranked in the top 5 percent (nationally) for performance on initiation and/or engagement rates using the IET measure. The intent was to have a mix of commercial and Medicaid plans; ultimately representatives from one commercial and five Medicaid plans participated in the study.

What is SAMHSA in health?

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Publication No. SMA 16-4984, NSDUH Series H-51. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 2016.

What is the purpose of expanding the 1115 waiver?

Among other things, expanding Section 1115 waivers to allow Medicaid reimbursement of residential treatment may have the secondary effect of increasing the number of residential placements available for everyone.

What is the benefit design of health plans?

Health plan interviewees described significant differences in their plan benefit arrays. All plans cover outpatient treatment services without prior authorization. All cover medically monitored and medically managed detoxification services , often requiring prior authorization or notification, but one only covers these services for pregnant women.

Why is co-location important for SUDs?

Co-location of SUD counseling and other services with primary care reduces the stigma of accessing a facility identified as treating SUDs, catches members in locations where they are more comfortable, and permits improved coordination between physical and behavioral health care.

What is advocacy in politics?

Advocacy is the active support of an idea or cause expressed through strategies and methods that influence the opinions and decisions of people and organisations.

How to communicate advocacy?

Good communications is at the core of effective advocacy. This requires attention to the message, the audience and the means of delivery. The message needs to be clear: it should explain what is being proposed, why it is needed, and what difference it would make. It also needs to be compelling: it should be crafted to the interests and knowledge of the audience. The means of delivery must ensure it is received and heard – whether, for example, a written proposal, face-to-face presentation or public demonstration. It is rare that a single advocacy message will be received and acted upon. The message needs to reinforced, by repetition and through the influence of secondary audiences.

Why are ICT policies so resistant?

Even the most clear-minded advocacy for pro-poor ICT policies can meet resistance for various reasons, including lack of political will, bureaucratic inertia, and counter arguments from well-resourced interest groups pursuing their own advocacy efforts.

How to engage in pro-poor ICT policy dialogue?

For effective pro-poor ICT policy dialogue, engagement on both fronts may be the most productive strategy: ensuring that ICT policy making is informed by a pro-poor perspective and strengthening that position by building support across government, especially those most engaged with poverty reduction and pro-poor development.

How does ICT monitoring help?

High profile ICT policy monitoring by civil society advocacy groups can, on its own, contribute to improved policy implementation and effectiveness by highlighting public policy targets and drawing public attention to under performance or to policy failure. Governments and public bodies, especially in democratic societies, are sensitive to critical reports, and more so when these are based on robust evidence and analysis, come from a credible source, and are widely published and disseminated.

What is pro-poor advocacy?

By “pro-poor advocacy” we mean advocacy for political decisions and actions that respond to the interests of people who directly face poverty and disadvantage. For those pursuing the goal of equitable and pro-poor ICT access, advocacy as a means to bring about change can be appropriate in a range of circumstances, including:

How does policy monitoring and public accountability work?

Policy monitoring and public accountability are made easier where government departments and other public bodies, including regulatory organisations, maintain and publish data and reports in a timely fashion and undertake research and consultation to facilitate decision making in the public interest. Where this is not the case, where the information is poor or unreliable, or where independent data is needed, civil society organisations and coalitions may organise their own research and data gathering, or they may rely on third party sources such as commercial and academic research.

How does nursing policy advocacy help?

In this article, we discuss nurse advocacy to advance public health and health equity through targeted social determinants, particularly on behalf of poor and disadvantaged persons. We discuss components of the right social policies and consider evidence-based policies that have linked improvements in social and economic conditions with increased physical, emotional, and mental health outcomes among poor and disadvantaged social groups. With a partnership perspective, select social determinants of health (SDOH) and mitigating policies focus nurses' social policy advocacy to improve the health of disadvantaged populations and reduce health inequities. We suggest nurses engage in multisectoral partnerships and adopt a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach to address social and health needs of concern. The conclusion offers resources and strategies to promote nurse engagement in health policy.

How can evidence-based policies help improve health?

Evidence-based, effective policies can ensure healthier communities and address the lack of access to social and material resources that form the root of health inequities. In this article, we discuss nurse advocacy on behalf of SDOH and health equity, particularly on behalf of poor and disadvantaged persons. We discuss components of the right social policies and consider evidence-based policies that have linked improvements in social and economic conditions with increased physical, emotional, and mental health outcomes among poor and disadvantaged social groups.We also highlight select social determinants of health (SDOH) and mitigating policies focus nurses’ social policy advocacy to improve the health of disadvantage populations and reduce health inequities. The conclusion offers resources and strategies to promote nurse engagement in health policy.

How can nurses improve public health?

Advocacy to improve public health through the lens of social determinants is critical for nurses at the individual and collective levels. Policy advocacy and committed resources are essential to address social factors that shape population health. Searching with an upstream approach to identify the causes of the causes of health inequities ( Braveman & Gottlieb, 2014) via awareness and screening in all settings is an important strategy. In addition, all nurses can use advocacy as a tool to inform and influence social policies that effectively address SDOH and promote a just and equitable society that encourage health for all. Advocacy to improve public health through the lens of social determinants is critical for nurses at the individual and collective levels.

What are the factors that contribute to SDOH?

SDOH include a number of factors such as socioeconomic status (SES), employment, housing, food security, transportation, education, as well as social support and the physical environment. There is substantial evidence to demonstrate an unequivocal link between social disadvantage and poor health.

How can public health programs interrupt the cycle of poverty, disadvantage, and poor health?

The right public health policies and programs can interrupt the cycle of poverty, disadvantage, and poor health by addressing inadequate social and material resources - often called social determinants of health (SODH). SODH are necessary for better health and longer life.

How do social policies impact health?

Social policies are more impactful on health and health outcomes than genetic endowment, individual behaviors, or access to healthcare services. There is a growing and robust body of evidence that links policy actions in four key social domains with improvements in well-being and reductions in health inequities.

Why seek appointments to non-nursing boards?

Seek appointments to non-nursing boards to add a health perspective around critical issues such as food insecurity, housing, transportation, and other social needs.

Who was an advocate for which cause?

Dorothea Dix was an advocate for which cause?

What is restorative justice?

Restorative justice emphasizes repairing the harm caused by crime.

When should children serve as intermediaries in parent-teacher communications?

Ideally, schools should ask children to serve as intermediaries in parent-teacher communications when parents have limited English proficiency.

Can immigrants be eligible for poverty programs?

Immigrants are not eligible for specific programs that may prevent poverty.

Is everyone vulnerable to mental illness?

All people, regardless of age, race, religion, or income, are vulnerable to mental illness.

What does the code use to describe vulnerable populations?

The Code uses the adjectives "disadvantaged, oppressed and exploited" to describe vulnerable populations.

Why is conflict necessary in social work?

Conflict might be necessary when others hold views that violate the Code of Ethics. As a social worker in training, you are obliged to support the rights, opportunities, benefits, and services that enhance the well-being of vulnerable populations and society as a whole.

What is micro in healthcare?

Micro: helping clients obtain services, rights, and benefits that would (likely) not otherwise be received by them and that would advance their well-being.

image
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9