How Do You Prove Disparate Treatment?
- Prima Facie Case To prove disparate treatment, the employee (plaintiff) must first present a “prima facie” case,...
- Employer’s Non-Discriminatory Reason Once the plaintiff makes his “prima facie” case, the employer must produce a...
- Proving the Employer’s Stated Reason is a Lie
Full Answer
What is prima facie case of disparate treatment discrimination?
The Prima Facie Case. The type of evidence an employee has to present to prove a prima facie case of disparate treatment discrimination depends on the facts. If there is direct evidence of discrimination, that’s enough.
How do you prove disparate treatment?
To prove a disparate treatment claim, an employee must first present enough evidence to allow the judge or jury to infer that discrimination took place. This is called presenting a "prima facie" case, because it seems at first appearance to be discrimination; what this evidence consists of depends on the facts, as explained below.
How can a plaintiff establish a prima facie case?
Under the direct evidence method, “a plaintiff can establish a prima facie case by providing direct evidence that [:] (1) the defendant employer acted with a discriminatory motive and (2) the discriminatory motivation was a significant or substantial factor in an employment decision.
What is an example of prima facie evidence of discrimination?
For example, if an employer hires only female bartenders or has said it will not promote African Americans to management positions, that's prima facie evidence of discrimination. Absent this type of smoking gun, an employee has to make a prima facie case through circumstantial evidence.
How to prove a disparate treatment claim?
To prove a disparate treatment claim, an employee must first present enough evidence to allow the judge or jury to infer that discrimination took place.
What is disparate treatment?
Disparate treatment is a way to prove illegal employment discrimination. An employee who makes a disparate treatment claim alleges that he or she was treated differently than other employees who were similarly situated, and that the difference was based on a protected characteristic. In other words, the employee alleges ...
What is prima facie case?
The Prima Facie Case. The type of evidence an employee has to present to prove a prima facie case of disparate treatment discrimination depends on the facts. If there is direct evidence of discrimination, that's enough. For example, if an employer hires only female bartenders or has said it will not promote African Americans to management ...
Why is an employee denied a promotion?
For instance, an employee is denied a promotion, and the employer claims that it was because the employee lacked an MBA. If the employee who was promoted also didn't have an MBA, the employer's decision looks suspect. Remarks by decision makers.
What is shifting justification?
Shifting justifications. If an employer gives different reasons at different times for its decision, that might be enough to prove pretext. For example, an employer tells an employee that her job is being eliminated in a company-wide restructuring, but then claims at trial that she was fired for poor performance.
Why was Horacio fired?
The employer claims that he was fired because he received three customer complaints in the previous quarter. If Horacio can show that other employees who received three or more complaints in a quarter were not fired, and that those employees were not Latino, his argument looks better.
What is the pretext for discrimination?
Once the employer states a legitimate reason for the decision, the employee must prove that it's a pretext for discrimination. This doesn't mean the employee has to come up with absolute proof of an illegitimate motive. Instead, the employee has to present some evidence that calls the employer's stated reason into question and allows the jury to conclude that the employer was really motivated by discrimination. Here are some examples:
REBUTTAL
What did the agency say was the reason for its treatment of complainant and the compared employees/applicants? How did the agency respond to other evidence, if any, of discrimination?
PRETEXT
Is there direct or circumstantial evidence that the agency's reason for its treatment of complainant is pretextual?
PRETEXT
Is there direct or circumstantial evidence that the agency's reason for rejecting complainant is pretextual?
PRETEXT
Is there direct or circumstantial evidence that the agency's reason for discipline or discharge of complainant is pretextual? For example, did the agency treat other individuals with similar performance problems more favorably than complainant?
PRIMA FACIE CASE
1) Had the complainant previously engaged in protected activity or opposed unlawful discrimination?
REBUTTAL
What did the agency say was the reason for the adverse employment decision?
PRETEXT
Is there direct or circumstantial evidence that the agency's reason for the employment decision is pretextual?
What does a plaintiff need to prove in a disparate treatment case?
The plaintiff in a disparate treatment case need only prove that membership in a protected class was a motivating factor in the employment decision, not that it was the sole factor. If the employer proves that it had another reason for its actions and it would have made the same decision without the discriminatory factor, it may avoid liability for monetary damages, reinstatement or promotion. The court may still grant the plaintiff declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-5 (g) (2) (B) (i) (overruling in part Price-Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989)).
What is direct evidence?
Under the direct method, a plaintiff attempts to establish that membership in the protected class was a motivating factor in the adverse job action. Plaintiff may offer direct evidence, such as that the defendant admitted that it was motivated by discriminatory intent or that it acted pursuant to a policy that is discriminatory on its face. In most cases, direct evidence of discrimination is not available, given that most employers do not openly admit that they discriminate. Facially discriminatory policies are only permissible if gender, national origin, or religion is a BFOQ for the position in question, as discussed above. Race or color may never be a BFOQ.
What is the burden shifting formula in McDonnell Douglas?
In the majority of cases, the plaintiff lacks direct evidence of discrimination and must prove discriminatory intent indirectly by inference. The Supreme Court has created one structure for analyzing these types of cases, commonly known as the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting formula, which it first articulated in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and later refined in Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981), and St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993). The analysis is as follows: (1) the plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination; (2) the employer must then articulate, through admissible evidence, a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions; and (3) in order to prevail, the plaintiff must prove that the employer's stated reason is a pretext to hide discrimination. McDonnell Douglas, 411 U. S. at 802-04; Burdine, 450 U.S. at 252-56. In the Seventh Circuit, courts generally analyze disparate treatment cases using this method, although attorneys may also use the direct method described above.
What happens if an employer takes an adverse employment action against an employee for a discriminatory reason?
If an employer takes an adverse employment action against an employee for a discriminatory reason and later discovers a legitimate reason which it can prove would have led it to take the same action, the employer is still liable for the discrimination, but the relief that the employee can recover may be limited.
Is statistics admissible in disparate treatment cases?
Statistics Statistics are admissible in individual disparate treatment cases, but their usefulness depend s on their relevance to the specific decision affecting the individual plaintiff. Lindemann and Grossman, 1 Employment Discrimination Law 34.
Is race a BFOQ?
Facially discriminatory policies are only permissible if gender, national origin, or religion is a BFOQ for the position in question, as discussed above. Race or color may never be a BFOQ. A plaintiff may also proceed under the direct method by offering any of the following three types of circumstantial evidence.
What is disparate treatment?
In summary, disparate treatment is a claim an employee can make against an organization that states that the company has treated them differently in a discriminatory way. In other words, disparate treatment is proof that an organization is discriminating against employees based on their race, religion, gender, sexuality, or other 'difference.'.
What is prima facie case?
If the employee can present a prima facie case, then the employer must state a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the decision. Once the employer presents such a reason, the employee must prove pretext: that the employer’s stated reason is false, a mere pretext for its true motive, which is discrimination.".
What is the difference between disparate treatment and adverse impact?
Make sure you know the difference between the two terms: adverse impact is an unintentional consequence that is derived from a poor hiring or business practice that ends up targeting specific groups. Disparate treatment, on the other hand, is intentional discrimination.
What happens if you treat someone with disparate treatment?
Disparate treatment can cause serious issues inside your organization. Not only can it lead to legal action, it can also cause your organization to lack diversity , which can dramatically impact your bottom line.
Is disparate treatment intentional?
Unlike adverse impact, which can spring up even if your intentions are pure, disparate treatment is intentional, meaning that it can be stopped before it starts by ensuring that your managers, hiring team, and other employees are not motivated to treat those in protected classes differently.
Disparate Impact vs Disparate Treatment Discrimination
How Do Employees Prove Disparate Treatment Discrimination?
- When dealing with employment discrimination, the first thing an employee will typically need to do is make a prima facie case that they are the victim of unlawful discrimination. This is just another way of saying the employee has enough evidence to establish their claim, although the employer will have a chance to refute it (more on this later). F...
Want to Learn Even More About Anti-Discrimination Laws?
- Now that you've learned a little bit about disparate treatment discrimination and the many complex legal issues that surround it, you might want to dig a bit deeper and learn more about the many other state and local anti-discrimination laws that are enforced throughout the county — and the best way to do this is to give Practical Law from Thomson Reuters a try. Get your free Practi…