In either of those situations, the studies have proven and been seen in the Abu Ghraib prison abuse. Also, like the experiments of Milgram, the Military Intelligence was able to inflict a form of peer pressure into the group. After all, they were just regular people who are trained to follow orders and not stand up to authority figures.
Full Answer
What was Milgram's experiment at Abu Ghraib?
Milgram's experiment results can be seen within the walls of Abu Graib. During the investigations into the abuse, many of the guards of Abu Ghraib claimed that they were just following orders by Military Intelligence in order to gain information from the prisoners.
How is the Abu Ghraib prison similar to the Stanford Prison Experiment?
Another comparison between the Abu Ghraib prison and The Stanford Prison Experiment has to do with the training of the guards. In both of these situations, the guards working at the facilities were not trained in managing prisons or prisoners.
What is the Abu Ghraib investigation and why is it important?
These images caused a global reaction of outrage— especially in the Arab world—but also provided proof for the U.S investigation that began in January of that same year into the treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. The investigation found intentional abuse of prisoners by military police.
What happened at Abu Ghraib prison?
Abu Ghraib prison. These were "common criminals," individuals suspected of being leaders of the insurgency, and individuals suspected of committing crimes against the occupational force led by the U.S. Although most prisoners lived in tents in the yard, the abuses took place inside cell blocks 1a and 1b.
What happened to prisoners at Abu Ghraib?
According to an eyewitness, 10 to 15 bodies arrived at a time from the Abu Ghraib prison and were buried by local civilians. An execution on 10 December 1999 in Abu Ghraib claimed the lives of 101 people in one day. On 9 March 2000, 58 prisoners were killed at a time. The last corpse interred was number 993.
How does Zimbardo explain the psychology of abuse at Abu Ghraib?
Zimbardo has argued that the soldiers at Abu Ghraib were stellar, all-American soldiers whose histories and personalities could not explain their abusive behavior. But an open-minded assessment of these soldiers reveals that some, at least, were not the all-American boy or girl next door.
What is the Abu Ghraib experiment?
In 1971, Philip G. Zimbardo, PhD, conducted a simulated jail study known as the Stanford Prison Experiment. Mirroring the Abu Ghraib situation, the Stanford guards--who had no apparent prior psychological problems --became brutal and abusive toward prisoners.
How does social psychology make sense of war crimes like what happened at Abu Ghraib?
This shows that social psychology can explain the atrocities at Abu Ghraib as it explains that the atrocities occurred due to people following the orders of authority figures, and also why some of the soldiers blamed those higher up than them when asked why they carried out the atrocity.
What does Zimbardo say about the Abu Ghraib incident?
Zimbardo said that unless systemic forces, including poverty, racism and military conditions like those that existed in Abu Ghraib are recognized and changed, imprisonment alone will never eliminate the problem of evil behavior and there will always be a bad apple at the bottom of the barrel.
What error did Zimbardo make in his research?
One mistake was his taking on the role of prison superintendent. Instead of simply observing from a neutral location or reviewing the data later, Zimbardo made himself an authority figure, which meant he was part of the experiment.
What happened at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo that raised concerns around the world about US actions?
What happened at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo that raised concerns around the world about U.S. actions? Enhanced interrogation techniques were used in violation of the Geneva Conventions regarding the conduct of war. How did the United States respond to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001?
Who Exposed Abu Ghraib?
Joe DarbyJoe Darby, a reserve soldier for the U.S. forces, exposed the violations ongoing at Abu Ghraib prison in January 2004. The photographs were handed to him on a CD by Charles Graner – after seeing the images, it took him 3 weeks to hand the photos in. Shortly after, the soldiers accused were removed from the base.
Who was responsible for Abu Ghraib?
Firstly, it will examine the role of Major General Geoffrey Miller, who directly shaped the policies that resulted in the Abu Ghraib abuse. Following on from this, the responsibility of Karpinski, head of 16 Iraqi detention facilities,34 and the commanding officer directly responsible for Abu Ghraib, will be discussed.
What happened at Abu Ghraib summary?
The Abu Ghraib scandal broke on 28 April 2004 when photos taken by him and other soldiers at the prison were revealed on CBS News. The pictures showed naked prisoners heaped into a pyramid, forced to simulate sexual acts and adopt humiliating poses.
What is the social psychological term for a change in behavior in response to the commands of others?
Fundamental. What is the social psychological term for a change in behavior in response to the commands of others? Obedience. Define groupthink. A type of thinking in which group members share such a strong motivation to achieve consensus that they lose the ability to critically evaluate alternative points of view.
What provides the best explanation for the causes of deviance or what Dr Zimbardo refers to as human evil )?
Having power over others is the key to understanding evil. According to Zimbardo, "giving people power without oversight is a prescription for abuse." He points to the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and the Jim Jones Peoples Temple disaster as examples of unchecked power causing evil.
How long did the prison guard experiment last?
The experiment was stopped after only 6 days, and some people have attributed the extreme role playing by the ‘prison guards’ as being caused by the situation and the power of authority, rather than the individual personalities of the participants playing the guards.
What crimes did the US commit during the Iraq War?
During the time of the Iraq war (specific ally 2003-2004), US Military personnel committed crimes of rape, sexual abuse, physical abuse, torture, sodomy and murder against the prisoners at Abu Ghraib Prison.
Why was Zimbardo sent to prison?
Other personnel were dishonourably discharged from duty, sent to military prison, repremanded for dereliction of duty or demoted. Zimbardo was an expert witness at the Abu Ghraib trials presumably due to his involvement in the Stanford Prison Experiment, which has some similarities to the abuse of power seen at Abu Ghraib Prison.
Where was the Stanford Prison Experiment?
The pictures above and below were taken at Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq during 2003-2004 and outline how some of the prisoners were mistreated by US military personnel. The Stanford Prison Experiment (1971) was a psychological experiment conducted by Professor Philip Zimbardo, whereby he wanted to observe the psychological effects ...
What was the sodomization of detainees with a baton?
Sodomization of detainees with a baton. Typing rope to detainees legs or genitals and dragging them across the floor. 17 soldiers and officers were removed from duty, and 11 soldiers were charged with offences including, battery, dereliction of duty, maltreatment and aggravated assault.
Who was the professor at Yale University who conducted the classic research in Abu Ghraib?
This is perhaps the most relevant line of research bearing on the incident at Abu Ghraib, and many in the press have drawn the connection. Stanley Milgram, who was a professor at Yale University, conducted the classic research in this area.
What did the Stanford Prison Experiment teach us?
The Stanford prison experiment taught us important lessons about the potential for prisoner abuse, even at the hands of ordinary and stable guards. It demonstrated, once again, the power of the situation. Yet, the experiment also showed that some of the guards were more abusive than others.
Why do people underestimate the power of the situation?
The first is that people underestimate the power of the situation to influence and shape their behavior. The second is that people show considerable and stable individual differences in their attitudes and in their actions. In other words, each of us has a personality that sets us apart from others, and our personalities tend to remain stable ...
Why was the Stanford experiment important?
Perhaps most important of all, the Stanford experiment taught us that leadership and oversight plays a significant role in these settings. In some ways, the abusive behavior of the guards in the Stanford experiment was precipitated or allowed to develop because of the ground rules and culture established at the outset.
What is the effect of one person being brave enough to defy authority?
If one person is brave enough to defy the commands of authority, it can dramatically reduce that authority's influence on others.
Argument Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin
If given the chance to save hundreds from a terrorist attack and all one had to do was carry out torture, would they do it? What if a young child was kidnapped and the police wanted permission to torture the kidnapper, would permission be granted? In “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin, he explains that torture is sometimes necessary.
Compare And Contrast Milgram And Zimbardo
In Stanley Milgram’s “The perils of obedience” and Philip G. Zimbardo's “The Stanford Prison Experiment” the influence that authority holds is analyzed and tested in a variety of social experiments.
Authority In The Short Story Antaeus, By Borden Bear
Renowned psychologist and social experimenter Stanley Milgram once said that “obedience is the psychological mechanism that links individual action to political purpose. It is the dispositional cement that binds men to systems of authority.” In other words, man succumbs to authority because it is rooted in his obedience to jurisdiction.
Zimbardo Dramaturgical Analysis Essay
In the research of Zimbardo’s prison experiment, lays an abundance of information regarding social structure and interaction. Philip G. Zimbardo, a psychologist and professor at Stanford University, conducted a dramaturgical analysis consisting of student volunteers within a prison simulation (zimbardo.socialpsychology.org).
Ghost Of Abu Ghraib Analysis
The United States invasion of Iraq in 2003 was dubbed Operation Iraqi Freedom by US Forces, but it seemed like freedom was the last thing on their minds. Abu Ghraib prison was an occupied Iraqi prison where the US Army held mass incarcerations and sponsored inmate torture.
Abu Ghraib Case Study
Through the horrible torture and humiliation that the victims endured at Abu Ghraib, Americans expressed their anger towards the Muslim race through abuse and torture.
Pros And Cons Of Torture For National Security
As the rate of terrorism seems to increase, so does the need for national security. As most people try to kill hundreds for numerous reasons, what can we do to stop them. There are some ways, simple ways that our easy to pursue. This is called torture for the national security.
What Happens When You Put Good People In Evil Places?
Dr. Craig Haney, a social psychologist participating in the Stanford experiment said of it,
Experiment Participant Relates To The Guards At Abu Ghraib
Dave Eshelman, who played the role of a prison guard in the Stanford University mock prison experiment, said of the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse photos,
What are the similarities between the Abu Ghraib prison and the Stanford prison experiment?
Another comparison between the Abu Ghraib prison and The Stanford Prison Experiment has to do with the training of the guards. In both of these situations, the guards working at the facilities were not trained in managing prisons or prisoners.
What was the U.S. investigation into Abu Ghraib?
The investigation found intentional abuse of prisoners by military police.
Why did the guards at Abu Ghraib fear attacks?
Although the guards of the prison experiment had no reason to fear the prisoners, the guards at Abu Ghraib constantly feared of attacks due to them being outnumbered by prisoners and being in the middle of a war zone.
What did Milgram find?
Milgram found that even though participants in the study are aware the order he gave them would inflict pain on another person, few participants could resist the order given by the authority figure (P359). For this study, Milgram used two other participants per session.
What did the prisoners wear in the prison?
The prisoners were stripped down and given smocks, nylon stocking caps to wear and instructed to use their ID numbers to “deindividualize” them. The smocks were like dresses since they did now have any underwear. This made them appear more feminine and limit the way they move. The guards also had a form of anonymity.
Where was Abu Ghraib prison?
In April of 2004, graphic images surfaced of U.S. soldiers abusing prisoners being held at the Abu Ghraib prison just outside of Bagdad in Iraq during the U.S led war on terrorism. The images showed soldiers abusing prisoners ...
What did Milgram's experiment prove?
The experiment proved that although people know their actions are wrong, they will still follow the orders of an authority figure. Milgram's experiment results can be seen within the walls of Abu Graib.