What is the indirect duty view in animal ethics?
The "indirect duty view," in animal ethics, holds that: a. We have moral obligations only to beings that also have moral obligations to us. b. We have moral obligations only to animals that have benefited us in some way. c.
What is the case for animal rights and Human Rights?
The first is how the theory that underlies the case for animal rights shows that the animal rights movement is a part of, not antagonistic to, the human rights movement. The theory that rationally grounds the rights of animals also grounds the rights of humans.
What are the goals of animal rights movement?
That movement, as I conceive it, is committed to a number of goals, including: the total abolition of the use of animals in science; the total dissolution of commercial animal agriculture; the total elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping.
What is Reagan's view on animal rights?
Animals do not have lesser inherent value than we do, Regan argues. Inherent value belongs equally to those who are experiencing subjects of a life. Regan forcefully argues that reason compels us to recognize the equal inherent value of animals and their equal right to be treated with respect.
How does Reagan regard what he calls the cruelty kindness view of animal rights?
Cruelty-kindness view: Our behavior toward animals is acceptable as long as we are kind and not cruel to them. Regan points out that having a kind motive or failing to be cruel is no guarantee of right action.
What does Regan say is the real ethical problem with our treatment of animals?
Cruelty fares no better. People or their acts are cruel if they display either a lack of sympathy for or, worse, the presence of enjoyment in another's suffering. Cruelty in all its guises is a bad thing, a tragic human failing.
What is Reagan's position on animal rights quizlet?
Regan argues that subjects-of-a-life have inherent value and are entitled to respectful treatment. What does he mean by viewing animals as moral patients? Animals are moral patients because they cannot apply moral principles.
What is indirect duty?
Kant argued for an “indirect duty view,” which has two independent parts. First, it holds that although we do have duties regarding the treatment of the other animals, we do not owe those duties to the other animals themselves but rather to ourselves.
How does Regan regard what he calls the cruelty kindness view of animal rights quizlet?
What is the cruelty kindness view? We have a duty to be kind and not to be cruel. We all have a right to be treated with kindness and not be treated cruelly.
How does Regan understand the inherent value of non-human animals?
Regan uses the term inherent value to express why he feels this way, inherent value in the case of animal ethics can be described as the value an animal possesses in its own right, as an end-in-itself, the opposite of this is instrumental value which means that an animal only has a value to other animals such as human ...
How does Tom Regan criticize Peter Singer's utilitarian reason for animal rights?
Unlike Singer, Regan argues against a utilitarianism perspective when considering animal equality. Utilitarianism has no room for the equal rights of different individuals because it has no room for their equal inherent value.
Which of the following does Regan claim regarding utilitarianism?
Regan argues that we should be more careful in our treatment of animals because they are instrumentally valuable. Utilitarianism, according to Regan, could be used to justify murder. Regan believes that animals have more inherent value than humans.
What is the fundamental wrong of our treatment of animals according to Regan?
T/F According to Regan, what is most objectionable about our treatment of animals is that we regard them as resources.
What is Warren's view on animal rights quizlet?
Warren believes that nonhuman animals have rights that are weaker than human rights.
What is fundamentally wrong with our current way of dealing with animals in our lives according to Regan?
According to Regan, what is most fundamentally wrong about the way we treat animals? a. the assumption that they are our resources. According to Regan, it is immoral to use animals in science for any purpose whatsoever.
Who argued for an indirect duty view?
Christine M. Korsgaard. Kant argued for an “indirect duty view,” which has two independent parts. First, it holds that although we do have duties regarding the treatment of the other animals, we do not owe those duties to the other animals themselves but rather to ourselves.
What is indirect duty?
First, it holds that although we do have duties regarding the treatment of the other animals, we do not owe those duties to the other animals themselves but rather to ourselves. Second, it holds that the reason for these duties is that treating the other animals badly will lead us to treat human beings badly. Chapter 7 will argue against the first thesis. This chapter argues that the second thesis makes our relationship to the other animals incoherent. Kant’s argument requires that responses like kindness and gratitude are appropriate responses to animals, but then invites us to treat having these responses as instrumental to something else. The chapter also examines some puzzles that arise when humans whose attitudes towards each other are influenced by a “moral filter” attempt to relate to amoral creatures like the other animals.
What is the theory that underlies the case for animal rights?
The theory that rationally grounds the rights of animals also grounds the rights of humans. Thus those involved in the animal rights movement are partners in ...
Why does utilitarianism have no room for the equal moral rights of different individuals?
Utilitarianism has no room for the equal moral rights of different individuals because it has no room for their equal inherent value or worth. What has value for the utilitarian is the satisfaction of an individual's interests, not the individual whose interests they are.
Can we do so even in the case of so lowly a creature as a laboratory rat?
Neither can we do so even in the case of so lowly a creature as a laboratory rat. It is not just refinement or reduction that is called for, not just larger, cleaner cages, not just more generous use of anaesthetic or the elimination of multiple surgery, not just tidying up the system. It is complete replacement.
Do animals have rights?
As for animals, since they cannot understand contracts, they obviously cannot sign; and since they cannot sign, they have no rights. Like children, however, some animals are the objects of the sentimental interest of others. You, for example, love your dog or cat.
Is utilitarianism an aggregative theory?
That utilitarianism is an aggregative theory — different individuals' satisfactions or frustrations are added, or summed, or totalled - is the key objection to this theory. My Aunt Bea is old, inactive, a cranky, sour person, though not physically ill.