What is the equitable solution to unequal access to fruits?
(a) For purposes of this § 270.18f-2 a series company is a registered open-end investment company which, in accordance with the provisions of section 18(f)(2) of the Act, issues two or more classes or series of preferred or special stock each of which is preferred over all other classes or series in respect of assets specifically allocated to that class or series.
How do we decide if a treatment is even needed?
· While the terms equity and equality may sound similar, the implementation of one versus the other can lead to dramatically different outcomes for marginalized people. Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the ...
Does improving quality concurrently reduce or eliminate inequities?
· Perhaps the preference for the term “equity” is simply due to the attractions of something new, like a new branding campaign. That means naming a contrast between the approaches signaled by “equity” and “equality” and usually means narrowing “equality” to a cookie-cutter approach of treating every person identically.
Is being fair better than treating everyone the same?
Many define it as treating everyone the same, but I would argue that doing so is the most unfair way to treat students. ... Identical treatment for two students who don't do homework for …
What is the difference between equal and equitable treatment?
Equity and equality are different. Equality means everyone is treated the same exact way, regardless of differences. Equity means everyone is provided with what they need to succeed.
How would you distinguish between identical treatment and equitable treatment in an organizational setting?
Identical treatment means that you treat people the same regardless of their differences. Equitable treatment means that you treat people equally and fairly but differently because of their differences.
What is the definition of equitable treatment?
Equitable treatment means people receive the same opportunity to reach a specific objective while specific considerations are in place. 'Equitable' is not the same as 'equal' because you must make specific considerations.
Which is better equality or equity?
Equality generally refers to equal opportunity and the same levels of support for all segments of society. Equity goes a step further and refers offering varying levels of support depending upon need to achieve greater fairness of outcomes.
How do you differentiate equity and equality in your organization?
Equality is simply making accommodations available to those who qualify. Equity refers to the specific things each person needs to succeed.
Why is equity and equality important in the workplace?
It establishes a diverse thought process in innovation and decision making and it facilitates needs-based development for the workforce. Moreover, because it enhances engagement among all employees, it promotes work satisfaction and by extension retention.
What is equitable and example?
The definition of equitable is something that is fair to all parties. When marital assets are split fairly in a divorce, this is an example of an equitable arrangement. adjective.
What is the difference between equity and equitable?
Defining Equity The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines equity as, “something that is equitable,” where equitable is defined as, “dealing fairly and equally with all concerned.” In education and social structures, equity refers to the fact that different people have varying needs of support and assistance.
What is equitable treatment in a news story?
Fairness and Equitable Treatment: Each person matters as an individual. Decisions and actions must consider the dignity and rights of the individual to be considered to be fair. Equitable treatment does not necessarily mean treating everyone the same.
What is the difference between equity and equality in health?
Equity acknowledges that different individuals need different supports to attain similar results. The same-sized ladders represent equality. Equality assumes that everyone will benefit from the same supports. Health equalityis equal treatment and availability of health care services for all people.
Why is equity so important?
Equity ensures everyone has access to the same treatment, opportunities, and advancement. Equity aims to identify and eliminate barriers that prevent the full participation of some groups.
What is the benefit of equity?
Less burden. With equity financing, there is no loan to repay. The business doesn't have to make a monthly loan payment which can be particularly important if the business doesn't initially generate a profit. This in turn, gives you the freedom to channel more money into your growing business.
What is the difference between equality and equity?
Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates ...
How can justice take equity one step further?
Justice can take equity one step further by fixing the systems in a way that leads to long-term, sustainable, equitable access for generations to come. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), equity is defined. External link:
What is equity in social justice?
Equity is a solution for addressing imbalanced social systems. Justice can take equity one step further by fixing the systems in a way that leads to long-term, sustainable, equitable access for generations to come.
What is the CDC?
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) refers to health equity. External link: open_in_new as “when everyone has the opportunity to be as healthy as possible.”. As such, equity is a process and equality is an outcome of that process. Or, as the Race Matters Institute.
What is physician participation in support group discussions?
Organizing physician participation in support group discussions to enhance understanding between providers and patients.
What is a community meeting?
A community meeting, where all members of the community are invited, about a local environmental health concern is held in English though English is not the primary language for 25% of the residents.
What are some examples of equity?
Examples of EquityThe community leaders hire translators to attend the meeting or offer an additional meeting held in another language.
How can equity and inequality be overcome?
Equality and equity both can call for understanding root causes of inequity and inequality , including historic patterns of privilege and disadvantage reflected in public policies and private views. Overcoming these patterns requires changes in the allocation of resources and reformations of existing avenues to success and well-being. Differences in pay for work performed by women rather than men, for example, reflect occupational segregation and social and legal attitudes; hence “pay equity” means considering whether occupations dominated by women, such as nursing home aide, are really any less demanding and worthwhile than occupations that have been dominated by men, such as corrections officer. 46 Deep changes in organizations and practices hold the possibility of starting fresh without the impact of longstanding exclusions and degradations. Another version of the cartoon of children peering behind a fence conveys the idea: some suggest replacing the wooden opaque fence with a more transparent chain-link fence, while a bolder idea proposes eliminating the fence altogether. 47 School counselor and blogger Lisa Koenecke asks, “What if we removed the fence all together? Let’s consider taking away barriers in order to promote equity.” 48 It is a powerful image. In practice, what does it mean: no fee for anyone to see a ballgame? Then how does the game become sustainable? What would that mean for college admissions and employment decisions?
What is equality testing?
Testing any classification of individuals by reference to a group trait—and questioning any treatment that differs from treatment of others— is simply one understanding of equality and a narrow one at that. As Professor Owen Fiss showed a half century ago, the use of the term “equality” can instead signal comparisons of groups and direct challenges to entrenched patterns of hierarchy and subordination on the basis of group traits. 12 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg each pursued this vision of equality and its resulting expansive methods while also embracing the recognition of the dignity of each individual. 13
What is Ford Foundation's definition of equity?
The Ford Foundation connects equity with fairness and equal opportunity. Hence, its values statement defines equity as “fair treatment, equality of opportunity, and fairness in access to information and resources for all.” 43 Others in philanthropy debate the meaning of equity and acknowledge it is a term in search of a definition. 44 Diversity, equity, and inclusion experts working in corporate, nonprofit, and education settings mix together these notions of fairness and commitment to changing processes and resource distribution. Thus, Code for America’s definition of equity states,
What is equity in education?
Equity means working to overcome the historical legacy of discrimination, marginalization, and underinvestment that disadvantages specific groups of people, especially defined by race. Equity requires providing support tailored to the specific needs of students.” 33 Rejecting identical resources and identical instruction as insufficient to meet the different needs of different students, education advocates stress that “equity” calls for something different than the same treatment for all that they associate with “equality.” 34
What is equity in law?
“Equity” actually has specific meanings: it refers to the common stock of a corporation, or ownership rights in property, or a claim recognized by law. Lawyers and historians of England know equity as a form of litigation and remedy originally rooted in the powers of the British monarch to provide legal recourse where the local common law itself ran out; here, “equity” refers to what emerged, and in some ways persists, as a distinctive system of individualized justice outside strict application of usual rules and advancing conscience and responsiveness to need. 27 Originally established as a separate court—the King’s Court of Chancery—equity norms and principles merged with standard state and federal courts within the United States; equity provides the authority for judicially ordered flexible corrections to otherwise rigid rules and allows shaping remedies tailored to the particular instance. “Equity” in law also draws on concepts from ancient Greek and Roman law and from Christian ideas. 28 From these historical sources, “equity” involves adapting existing law to changing conditions or to unique circumstances and, often, departure from general, settled rules. 29 The results can be unpredictable, subject to the views or whims of particular decision-makers.
What does "fairness, impartiality, equity" mean?
The Oxford English Dictionary gives “fairness, impartiality, equity” as a definition of “equality” and defines “equity” as “the quality of being equal or fair.” 21 Merriam-Webster Dictionary starts its many definitions for “equity” with “free from bias or favoritism” or “justice according to natural rights or law.” 22
How did the Constitution break the promise of equal protection of the laws?
The promise of equal protection of the laws was broken from the start of the United States by the Constitution’s protections for the institution of slavery. The Civil War and resulting amendments announced a new due process and equal protection of the laws, and they empowered federal enforcement. At times, the nation has seen delivery on the promise of equal protection. 115 But the Supreme Court drastically narrowed the Amendments’ scope, and states and private white resistance actively thwarted the Amendments through “Jim Crow” laws mandating racial segregation, lax or nonexistent law enforcement, extra-legal violence reinforcing “white supremacy,” and retrenchment of judicial action. Despite decades of social and legal movements to overcome legally enforced racial subjugation, the nation remains enmeshed in patterns of racial disadvantage, exclusion, and expropriation, with the mass incarceration and disenfranchisement of African Americans and serious political challenges to birthright citizenship, voting rights, due process, and equal protection of the law. This history is fully documented by Eric Foner, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., and others. 116 Its operations in the psyches and interactions of individuals are also laid bare by the works of scholars, novelists, filmmakers, and memoirists. 117 Different but similarly appalling stories of the failure of the equal protection of the law affect the daily lives of people identified as Asian American, Latinx, sexual or gender minorities, and persons with disabilities.
What to do when students complain about it's not fair?
When students complain that "it’s not fair" if their consequence is different from another student's, remind them that: Fair isn't equal. Talking about others is gossip and you won't do it. Add that you will not talk about them to others. Ask them what would be fair.
What are the most important qualities of a teacher?
If you ask students what are the most important qualities they like in teachers, one of the universally top-mentioned is fairness. Teachers and schools strive to be fair and build programs and polices based on this value.
How to conclude a conversation with Juan?
Here is the best way to conclude the discussion: "I really care about Juan, and I'm willing to do whatever it takes to help him improve his behavior. But there is one thing I will never do, no matter what. I will never treat him like everyone else. Your child deserves a lot better than that."
Why don't two students do homework?
Identical treatment for two students who don't do homework for different reasons -- one who has to help at the family business after school, and one who watches too much television -- is no different than that crazy doctor with the single cure for all headaches.
What happens when a teacher violates a rule?
When a rule is violated, the teacher can choose from a large set of possible consequences. These consequences work best when spelled out in advance to students, administrators and parents. There is no defined order or progression. Pick the one that works best or the one you think will be effective from your knowledge of the student. Often it is very effective to give a student a choice from the list along with a promise to improve or the possibility of losing the privilege of choosing.
Is it better to be fair or to treat everyone the same?
Being truly fair is harder and requires more work in the short run that just treating everyone the same. In the long run, it saves time and is more effective. And when it comes to treating everyone the same, every child deserves a lot better than that.
Is there a danger in progressive consequence?
There is great danger in using progressive consequence schemes. No one would go to a doctor who treats all headaches the same, since the cause for one may be allergies and the other a tumor.
What are the three critical concepts of assessment?
The assessment process involves three critical concepts – reliability, validity, and standardization . Actually, these three are important to science in general. First, we want the assessment to be reliable or consistent. Outside of clinical assessment, when our car has an issue and we take it to the mechanic, we want to make sure that what one mechanic says is wrong with our car is the same as what another says, or even two others. If not, the measurement tools they use to assess cars are flawed. The same is true of a patient who is suffering from a mental disorder. If one mental health professional says the person suffers from major depressive disorder and another says the issue is borderline personality disorder, then there is an issue with the assessment tool being used (in this case, the DSM and more on that in a bit). Ensuring that two different raters are consistent in their assessment of patients is called interrater reliability. Another type of reliability occurs when a person takes a test one day, and then the same test on another day. We would expect the person’s answers to be consistent, which is called test-retest reliability. For example, let’s say the person takes the MMPI on Tuesday and then the same test on Friday. Unless something miraculous or tragic happened over the two days in between tests, the scores on the MMPI should be nearly identical to one another. What does identical mean? The score at test and the score at retest are correlated with one another. If the test is reliable, the correlation should be very high (remember, a correlation goes from -1.00 to +1.00, and positive means as one score goes up, so does the other, so the correlation for the two tests should be high on the positive side).
Why are some disorders not included in the main body of the APA?
Additionally, some disorders were not included within the main body of the document because they did not have the scientific evidence to support their widespread clinical use, but were included in Section III under “Conditions for Further Study” to “highlight the evolution and direction of scientific advances in these areas to stimulate further research” (APA, 2013).
When was the DSM revised?
The Herculean task of revising the DSM began in 1999 when the APA embarked upon an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the DSM in coordination with the World Health Organization (WHO) Division of Mental Health, the World Psychiatric Association, and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).
When was the DSM 5 published?
3.2.2.1. A brief history of the DSM. The DSM-5 was published in 2013 and took the place of the DSM IV-TR (TR means Text Revision; published in 2000), but the history of the DSM goes back to 1944 when the American Psychiatric Association published a predecessor of the DSM which was a “statistical classification of institutionalized mental patients” and “…was designed to improve communication about the types of patients cared for in these hospitals” (APA, 2013, p. 6). The DSM evolved through four major editions after World War II into a diagnostic classification system to be used psychiatrists and physicians, but also other mental health professionals. The Herculean task of revising the DSM began in 1999 when the APA embarked upon an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the DSM in coordination with the World Health Organization (WHO) Division of Mental Health, the World Psychiatric Association, and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). This collaboration resulted in the publication of a monograph in 2002 called A Research Agenda for DSM-V. From 2003 to 2008, the APA, WHO, NIMH, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) convened 13 international DSM-5 research planning conferences “to review the world literature in specific diagnostic areas to prepare for revisions in developing both DSM-5 and the International Classification of Disease, 11th Revision (ICD-11)” (APA, 2013).
What are the two types of observation?
3.1.3.1. Observation. In Section 1.5.2.1 we talked about two types of observation – naturalistic, or observing the person or animal in their environment, and laboratory, or observing the organism in a more controlled or artificial setting where the experimenter can use sophisticated equipment and videotape the session to examine it at a later time. One-way mirrors can also be used. A limitation of this method is that the process of recording a behavior causes the behavior to change, called reactivity. Have you ever noticed someone staring at you while you sat and ate your lunch? If you have, what did you do? Did you change your behavior? Did you become self-conscious? Likely yes, and this is an example of reactivity. Another issue is that the behavior made in one situation may not be made in other situations, such as your significant other only acting out at the football game and not at home. This form of validity is called cross-sectional validity. We also need our raters to observe and record behavior in the same way or to have high inter-rater reliability.
What is predictive validity?
Predictive validity is when a tool accurately predicts what will happen in the future. Let’s say we want to tell if a high school student will do well in college. We might create a national exam to test needed skills and call it something like the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). We would have high school students take it by their senior year and then wait until they are in college for a few years and see how they are doing. If they did well on the SAT, we would expect that at that point, they should be doing well in college. If so, then the SAT accurately predicts college success. The same would be true of a test such as the Graduate Record Exam (GRE) and its ability to predict graduate school performance.
How does a mental health professional assess a client?
For a mental health professional to be able to effectively help treat a client and know that the treatment selected worked (or is working), he/she first must engage in the clinical assessment of the client, or collecting information and drawing conclusions through the use of observation, psychological tests, neurological tests, and interviews to determine the person’s problem and the presenting symptoms. This collection of information involves learning about the client’s skills, abilities, personality characteristics, cognitive and emotional functioning, the social context in terms of environmental stressors that are faced, and cultural factors particular to them such as their language or ethnicity. Clinical assessment is not just conducted at the beginning of the process of seeking help but throughout the process. Why is that?
What are the dimensions of inequalities in health care?
The many dimensions of inequities in health care include race, ethnicity, age, gender, social class, culture, and ability to pay. The persistent and unacceptable gap in health care access, use, and outcomes by race and ethnicity raises many questions about equity, fairness, and social justice given the history of discrimination in this country and society's struggle to rid itself of vestiges of legal and de facto segregation. The racial/ethnic gap in care quality is also a challenge and an affront to our abilities to achieve “best care.” BHCS has several goals related to equity:
Why is it important to collect race and ethnicity data?
Collecting accurate race/ethnicity data is a prerequisite for a comprehensive strategy to address inequities in health care. Not unlike BHCS, managed care plans, integrated health care systems, and hospitals around the country are taking this first step to identify inequities and are using race/ethnicity data as the foundation for clinical interventions to improve the quality of health care for racial and ethnic populations.
Why is health care inequity important?
Persistent health care inequities also raise concerns regarding the overall quality of health care and may have significant implications for overall health care expenditures. Greater equity and accountability of the health care system is important to a growing constituency of payers, providers, and individual consumers. Businesses, who sponsor and pay for employees' health insurance, are becoming increasingly concerned about the quality of care their employees receive given the rising health expenditures and the negative impact poor-quality care has on workers' productivity, attendance, and health care costs.
What is equity in healthcare?
Equity:provide care that does not vary in quality because of personal characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic status (SES).
What is the purpose of safety?
Safety:avoid injuries to patients from care that is intended to help them.
What is the difference between equity and efficiency?
Efficiency: avoid waste, including waste of equipment, supplies, ideas, and energy. Equity: provide care that does not vary in quality because of personal characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic status (SES).
What is the health care quality chasm?
The health care quality chasm is better described as a gulf for certain segments of the population, such as racial and ethnic minority groups, given the gap between actual care received and ideal or best care quality.
What is a micrographic?
T or F: Micrographics are small pictures placed on the outside of folders that serve as alerts.
What is a T or F?
T or F: Typed entries made during the continuing care of the patient should be signed or initialed by the attending physician.
What does T or F mean?
T or F: Noncontributory, normal, negative, and within normal limits all mean the same thing.
How are burns documented?
T or F: Burns are documented by including the site, size, and number of lesions.
What is the only part of a woman's name that she assumes when she marries?
T or F: Legally, the surname is the only part of her husband's name a woman assumes when she marries.
Where should the folder be checked?
a. check in front of and behind where the folder should be.
Who interprets C.?
c. are interpreted by the medical assistant
When a researcher's expectations or preferences about the outcome of a study influence the results obtained, it is
When a researcher's expectations or preferences about the outcome of a study influence the results obtained, it is referred to as#N#A. experimenter bias.#N#B. the placebo effect.#N#C. subject bias.#N#D. the sampling effect.
How long did Helen do the spatial task?
She found that the mean response time was 1.48 minutes for males and 1.63 minutes for females. For Helen to be confident that an actual difference exists between the males and females in her study, she must
What is our behavior shaped by?
A. Our behavior is shaped by our cultural heritage.
Who designed the experiment in which participants listened to a persuasive speech delivered either by a person who was very tall
A. Derrick designed an experiment in which participants listened to a persuasive speech delivered either by a person who was very tall or a person who was average in height. In addition, the speeches were delivered either by individuals wearing business clothes or by people wearing casual clothes. In this example, Derrick.